[Antoninus]

Yeah, that's why not a single magazine in existence has ever published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures.

Boy am I surprised to see you on this thread. /sarc

Hefner's mag would have been one out of a thousand without the titty-pics. Why don't you rattle me off a list of the magazines which "published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures" that were around in the 1950s and still exist today?

[MineralMan]

"Why don't you rattle me off a list of the magazines which "published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures" that were around in the 1950s and still exist today?"

Harper's
Atlantic Monthly
New Yorker

I could go on, but those are just off the top of my head.