[RSmithOpt]

As with other laws currently on the books, doesn't seem as though the government and the elected officials are enforced, much less followed. Seems as though the DA has more political ambition than sense of duty and fairness.

Explicit is not offensive at all concerning this case.......some people will not accept the complete lack of evidence at this point, not to mention DNA (male fluids) found on the woman that does not match any of the party goers....so, my question is, is that person(s) guilty of the crime of rape, or a john, or a conspirator(s) convincing the girl to attempt this fraud?

[Blueflag]

FWIW, from what I have read, there were NO (none) "male fluids" or any other evidence of recent sexual activity uncovered during her exam.

DNA tests don't require the presence of semen. And again, NONE was found -- of the party-goers or others(AFAIK).