Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RSmithOpt

FWIW, from what I have read, there were NO (none) "male fluids" or any other evidence of recent sexual activity uncovered during her exam.

DNA tests don't require the presence of semen. And again, NONE was found -- of the party-goers or others(AFAIK).


31 posted on 04/11/2006 6:25:53 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Blueflag
Good observation on the (no male fluids), but there's a story out there somewhere as to where that was oppositely stated 2 days or more previous. So, my question: Who is telling the truth in the DA's office? I'm trying to find the quotes to back that up......so, exactly how does it get determined 'recent sexual activity'? Cut marks, scrapes and bruises?
34 posted on 04/11/2006 6:31:22 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson