[Blueflag]

IT's important to add that during the course of the DNA investigation they swabbed the woman's body, 'orifices,' purse, cel phone, fingernails etc etc etc and FOUND NO DNA from any of the party-goers. Ipso facto, there is NO DNA evidence to suggest ANY of the party-goers touched her, grabbed her, restrained her, penetrated her etc etc AND the exam revealed there was no physical evidence the woman had endured vaginal or anal (sodomy was a charge) intercourse or injury. Sorry for being explicit.

Time to file a motion for dismissal. But then again, I don't think anyone has been legally charged with ANY offense.

[RSmithOpt]

As with other laws currently on the books, doesn't seem as though the government and the elected officials are enforced, much less followed. Seems as though the DA has more political ambition than sense of duty and fairness.

Explicit is not offensive at all concerning this case.......some people will not accept the complete lack of evidence at this point, not to mention DNA (male fluids) found on the woman that does not match any of the party goers....so, my question is, is that person(s) guilty of the crime of rape, or a john, or a conspirator(s) convincing the girl to attempt this fraud?