I'm glad she is disappointed, there are no designated spots on the Supreme Court.
1 posted on
04/08/2006 2:25:05 PM PDT by
skandalon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: skandalon
I am dissapointed the old hag never bothered to read this.
![](http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=The+Constitution/v=2/SID=e/l=IVI/;_ylt=A9iby6I8OjhEHzkAVrCjzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTA4NDgyNWN0BHNlYwNwcm9m/SIG=128gvmsfm/EXP=1144622012/*-http%3A//www.fathom.com/media/1574_Constitution_Lg.jpg)
25 posted on
04/08/2006 3:34:55 PM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: skandalon
Well there's still Ginsberg and Souter ...
To: skandalon
Too bad...So Sad....Bye Bye!!
To: skandalon
Justice O'Connor: You've had your "Day" in court.
To: skandalon
This old broad was/is a total left wing moonbat.
To: skandalon
Give the lady a hanky. Life can be so cruel.
To: skandalon
32 posted on
04/08/2006 3:53:22 PM PDT by
LibKill
(Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. - Benjamin Franklin)
To: skandalon
![](http://www.pickeringcreek.com/newcig.gif)
|
|
Her speaking fees just increased by 500%. |
33 posted on
04/08/2006 3:54:05 PM PDT by
Fintan
(Did you really think I could post such insightful replies if I actually read the article???)
To: skandalon
AMERICA IS NOT DISAPPOINTED THAT THIS INFANTICIDE BUTCHER FINALLY RETIRED! IT'S TOO BAD SHE DIDN'T RETIRE THE YEAR AFTER HER ANNOINTMENT!
To: skandalon
Me too Mrs. O'Connor.
I can't wait till the Ann Coulter nomination. ;o)
39 posted on
04/08/2006 4:07:32 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Happy 150th Birthday Kerrville!)
To: skandalon
I agree. Man or Woman doesn't matter, the judge that fills the chair does.
41 posted on
04/08/2006 4:14:35 PM PDT by
JOE43270
(JOE43270, God Bless America and All Who Have and Will Defend Her.)
To: skandalon
I am just plain glad she is no longer on the court. We don't need people such as she who do not use the constitution as a guideline; only as a stepping stone for their own personal agendas. That we sure don't need.
To: skandalon
Bush tried his best to give her her wish.
43 posted on
04/08/2006 4:20:17 PM PDT by
Modok
To: skandalon
Sandra,
You drag it around like a ball and chain
You wallow in the guilt; you wallow in the pain
You wave it like a flag, you wear it like a crown
Got your mind in the gutter, bringin' everybody down
Complain about the present and blame it on the past
I'd like to find your inner child and kick its little ass
Get over it
Get over it
All this bitchin' and moanin' and pitchin' a fit
Get over it, get over it
To: skandalon
Hey Sandy, how would your speech have changed if Janice Rogers Brown had been confirmed to take your place?
45 posted on
04/08/2006 4:27:21 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
To: skandalon
O'Connor seemed feckless, if not completely unqualified for the supremes.
In her favor, she sided with the 5-4 majority that agreed that Dubya won the 2000 election. (I think the issue was whether the Florida legislature or left wing Fla state supremes had jurisdiction over the certification, and the leg clearly had it.)
With this vote, and considering what happened in 2001, she had a positive impact on the country that I believe counteracts at least some of her many incompetent and left-leaning votes. (I understand, however, that this is a highly debatable point.)
Her legacy? "Undistinguished" comes to mind.
.
46 posted on
04/08/2006 4:29:36 PM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: skandalon
That's certainly a sexist comment. She must want that quota system for the SCOTUS: the Jew seat, the black seat, the woman's seat, the inevitable Mexican seat, etc. I'm sure in the future someone will get the bright idea for a Muslim seat. I hope I'm dead by then.
To: skandalon
"Sandra Day O'Connor said yesterday that she was sad that a woman was not chosen to fill the U.S. Supreme Court seat opened by her retirement."Gee, Granny O'Connor, and I'm sad that you didn't retire about two weeks after you were sworn in.
48 posted on
04/08/2006 4:37:24 PM PDT by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: skandalon
As a woman I am disappointed that she is disappointed. I could care less what the gender of the USSC justice is. I want to know what they think about the Constitution not what chromosomes they are made up of. She needs to move on she is so behind the times. This is the time of post feminism. At least it is for me.
49 posted on
04/08/2006 5:01:45 PM PDT by
therut
To: skandalon
The most qualified women the democrats would NEVER allow..
What a ditz... almost as bad as Rube Ginsberg..
52 posted on
04/08/2006 5:27:55 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson