Posted on 04/06/2006 5:13:29 PM PDT by RWR8189
In announcing he will resign his congressional seat, Rep. Tom DeLay did one last favor for his party, strengthening the likelihood that Republicans will retain the 22nd District of Texas this November and, with it, control of the U .S. House.
DeLay cited his desire to prevent "liberal Democrats an opportunity to steal this seat with a negative, personal campaign." But the underlying and unstated factor is the growing belief that the House GOP's 12-year majority is in jeopardy and every single race could count.
Still, long before a mounting array of legal charges and political turmoil combined to put an abrupt end to the Sugar Land lawmaker's tumultuous House career, he had achieved something far more lasting than victory in a single election. Largely due to DeLay's efforts, the Texas Republican party has not only gained but probably cemented control of the state's congressional election for the next generation. That's the likely long-term result of the controversial redistricting plan that he helped muscle through the newly Republican state legislature in 2003.
This year, Democrats were largely concentrating on DeLay and on protecting one more threatened incumbent of their own, Rep. Chet Edwards of Waco, while hoping that the U. S. Supreme Court will overturn part or even most of DeLay's handiwork.
But the reaction of the justices during a hearing on the Democratic appeal last month led most court observers to conclude that was unlikely.
And even if it happens, the GOP majority that the plan created seems likely to endure for at least the next decade or two, though Democrats and some Republicans fear it could be overcome sooner if the GOP fails to attract more of the state's growing Hispanic vote.
Besides protecting his own House seat, DeLay's departure from the political scene removes one of the principle targets of the Democratic contention that GOP control of the White House, the Senate and the House has led to a "culture of corruption" epitomized by the burgeoning probe in which GOP lobbyist/fundraiser Jack Abramoff and at least two former DeLay aides have pleaded guilty.
But there are questions as to how deep the legal and political damage will extend within Congress. Many analysts believe that Democratic prospects in November stem morefrom the problems that President Bush has encountered in Iraq and his mismanagement of things like Hurricane Katrina and the Dubai port deal.
Beyond the political impact, Delay's departure removes one of the principal architects of the success that House Republicans have enjoyed in passing many of President Bush's initiatives despite their relatively slender majority.
In his formal statement, the congressman said he was proud of his contributions "to the conservative movement. . . and the enduring national conservative majority that has been transforming our nation for the past decade."
How long that majority continues to shape national policy may be open to question, but there's no doubt that the success Republicans have enjoyed in cutting federal taxes, along with their failure to curb over-all federal spending, will continue to play a major role in setting national policy.
And it has been the House Republicans, led in large part by DeLay, who have been in the vanguard of that effort.
The DeLay legacy is not, of course, totally positive, even from a Republican viewpoint.
To his many critics, his success in melding the Republican political machine with the lobbyists of Washington's K Street has led to a level of corruption of which Abramoff may be the worst, but perhaps not the only, example.
But the cautious way in which Congress has been approaching the question of lobbying reform suggests that very little is likely to change, other than through prosecutions of outright criminality.
Long before Republicans won control of the House, DeLay had started to make a reputation as an expert vote-counter with a good sense of the pulse of the membership. In choosing now to step down, he shows he has not lost that knack.
Delay gave the best interview I've ever heard on Rush's show yesterday. I was glued to the broadcast.
He was totally conservative and unapologetic about it.
I also think that the law of unintended consequences will rule on this event. The dems wanted to to drive Delay from power. Once out of power Delay is no longer bound by the rules to play nice with the opposition. I think the dems will regret this event in the up coming months.
Nagin and Blanco's mismanagement of Katrina has now become Bush's mismanagement of the same, in a purportedly objective bit of analysis from the mainstream media.
DeLay was the only fighter in the GOP leadership. The rest of them are a bunch of posers and ninnies.
Tancredo.
Does anybody know the date when Delay will face the laundering charges?
I'm pretty sure FReeper/Troll SolidSupplySide will be more than happy to tell you. He's got the dates circled on his calender.
Carl Leubsdorf is a less-talented Dan Rather. No doubt he will retire someday in Austin, the big blue anus of Texas, where we have wisely quantined all the liberals so they can impress each other and leave the rest of us alone.
You know what, I want to apologize for my previous post to you. I read your reply too fast and reacted with some frustration I hold to you from posts in the past.
I am sorry
One thing that's definitely noticeable is NOTHING much is getting done in the House. Tom made it happen.
The Hammar will be pounding other nails... thats what he does.. well, I might add..
Thanks. For a minute there I was going to go sulk into a corner and cry.
hehehe, you're a wacko
That's not fair. I've been consistent in saying that Ronnie Earle is criminalizing his political opponents.
The bribes paid by Ed Buckham to DeLay through his wife Christine, though, are a serious problem. I only oppose real corruption, not phony political posturing by an out-of-control Travis County DA.
Let me restate that. I am opposed to phony political posturing by an out-of-control Travis County DA. I am not swayed by his outrageous antics. I'm not following Earle's case. I'm following the Abramoff case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.