I've heard that too. It's less "trauma" for the woman, just in the mechanics of how it works. I mean, probably 90% of 6.5 billion people are uncirc. Why it continues here is beyond me. If you aren't a clean person, it doesn't matter if you're cut or not, you're going to stink anyway. The cancer bit is the same either way. Shrug. I don't and won't have any boys, but I wouldn't cut them. If it becomes a problem later, so be it. Let them grow up and have their own choice on the issue.
Well put.
You won't hear the circumcised back down. It's turned into an emotional thing and when that happens, brain turns off.
The foreskin wouldn't be on human males if it were bad for them. It would have been bred out by nature if it were.
If the foreskin were so evil, dangerous and stinky, 90% of the world's males WOULD BE circumcised, instead of the other way around.
We've learned to eat pork too. Jews, Arabs and Muslims still don't eat it. Well, neither do Hindus. HEY, that's more bacon, ham, sausage and pork roast for MOI!!!
Men are born with foreskins for evolutionary reasons, many of which we probably have no inkling of.
Information:
http://www.circumstitions.com/Sexuality.html
http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/
In 1949 my pa knew circumcision was not right and wouldn't let the doc touch me! My father was treated the same by his dad and I suspect non=circumcision goes back in my dad's family for hundreds of years
[Thanks dad!]
My son isn't cut, nor will my grandson be either.
And my whole family is devoutly Christian.
Circumcision can prevent full intimate contact between a man and a woman:
Quote:
I have dealt, time and again, with talk show hosts who say "If I had any more sensitivity, I couldn't stand it." I think the reason for this is that, without the Meissner's corpuscles in the ridged band of the foreskin to provide sensory feedback, a man doesn't know where he is in relation to the orgasmic threshold. Many men think their inability to control orgasmic timing is due to over-sensitivity rather than the fact the lack tens of thousands of important nerve endings that provide essential feedback
http://www.circumstitions.com/Sexuality.html
Unquote
Circumcising male infants is backward, unnatural and long overdue for abandonment as a civilized practise. Let men make up their own minds to have it done when the are old enough to choose for themselves for religious reasons, or alleged health reasons. Its just as backward and unwarranted as the Muslim circumcision of females.