[starfish923]

I've heard that too. It's less "trauma" for the woman, just in the mechanics of how it works. I mean, probably 90% of 6.5 billion people are uncirc. Why it continues here is beyond me. If you aren't a clean person, it doesn't matter if you're cut or not, you're going to stink anyway. The cancer bit is the same either way. Shrug. I don't and won't have any boys, but I wouldn't cut them. If it becomes a problem later, so be it. Let them grow up and have their own choice on the issue.

Well put.
You won't hear the circumcised back down. It's turned into an emotional thing and when that happens, brain turns off.

The foreskin wouldn't be on human males if it were bad for them. It would have been bred out by nature if it were.
If the foreskin were so evil, dangerous and stinky, 90% of the world's males WOULD BE circumcised, instead of the other way around.

We've learned to eat pork too. Jews, Arabs and Muslims still don't eat it. Well, neither do Hindus. HEY, that's more bacon, ham, sausage and pork roast for MOI!!!

[RipSawyer]

You won't hear the circumcised back down. It's turned into an emotional thing and when that happens, brain turns off.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Thank you kindly! I think you are absolutely correct!