Posted on 04/05/2006 10:30:54 AM PDT by doug from upland
WATCH JAYNA'S VIDEO NEWS REPORT --- IRAQI CONNECTION
In addition to this video, Jayna has eyewitness, several more than are on the video, who identify Hussain Al-Hussaini as THE THIRD TERRORIST. There is an Iraqi connection to the OKC bombing. Bill Clinton wanted it to be domestic terror, so that is what Janet Reno gave him. Had Clinton been a real commander in chief, he would have dealt with the Islamic threat, and we could have avoided 9-11.
Jayna has 22 eye witnesses. Fourteen are on tape being grilled by Dave Schippers. Why is no one listening to them? Why isn't congresses allowed to watch Schippers examine them and hear their testimony in closed session?
JAYNA SAYS ROHRABACHER WON'T USE WITNESS VIDEOS
JAYNA'S EMAIL TO ME TODAY --
After a year-long investigation, California Congressman Dana Rohrabacher has “concluded there is ample evidence to justify an investigative hearing” into the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. In a March 30, 2006 memorandum to Chairman Henry Hyde, Rohrabacher advances the theory that German national Andreas Strassmeier, a purported government informant living in an eastern Oklahoma white separatist community, may have “played a significant role in the planning and execution” of this historic crime. The congressman persists in resurrecting this lifeless, wholly discredited conspiracy theory despite salient facts which repudiate neo-nazi involvement in the greatest act of terror in 20th century America. So where’s the proof? There is none.
A string of court rulings and a book authored by Jon Hersley, the former lead investigator for the FBI Oklahoma Bomb Task Force, establishes that the most prodigious federal investigation failed to uncover any evidence whatsoever implicating the Elohim City security officer, Andreas Strassmeier, residents of the religious compound, and the jailed members of the Aryan Republican Army (ARA) who perpetrated a host of Midwestern bank robberies during the early 1990s. Despite the Bureau’s exhaustive efforts, it could not produce one motel registration log, phone record, fingerprint, or eyewitness account linking these alleged conspirators to “any overt act in the commission of the crime.” Moreover, much to the chagrin of federal agents, the FBI was forced to testify under oath before Judge Steven Taylor during Terry Nichols’ 2004 murder trial that the neo-nazi gang of bank robbers, Strassmeier, and his former neighbors at Elohim City have provable alibis and have been officially cleared of suspicion by the Bureau.
Endless paper trail hits dead end
A Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking to unseal FBI files which might indicate that the ARA bank robbers and/or Strassmeier acted as government informants in “a sting operation gone awry” produced more than three hundred pertinent documents but not a single revelatory or no smoking gun. However, the FOIA case did prove that the FBI had redacted names of informants residing in Elohim City, but none was named as a participant in the bombing. The endless paper trail led to a dead end, but it did tell an intriguing story of the FBI’s failed quest to find McVeigh’s legendary accomplice, John Doe 2. It soon became evident that the Bureau conducted a myopic manhunt bent on collaring a “homegrown” third terrorist of Caucasian, not foreign heritage. Absent of such evidence, they refused legitimate leads into a Middle Eastern connection as they did not fit into their prescripted scenario.
In early 1996, the Bureau conducted an unprecedented investigation in a Herculean effort to connect the rogue Aryan Republican Army militiamen turned bank robbers to the two Oklahoma City bombers. After all, they were cut from the same cloth as Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols and indubitably fit the profile of the anti-government, angry white men who avenged their hatred of the establishment by destroying a federal complex. All one has to do is to simply recall the social and political climate that existed at the time to understand that the Bureau’s need to force-fit a suspect matching that profile.
Judge rules homegrown terrorist complicity a “dry hole, hyperbole”
After conducting 25-thousand witness interviews, the FBI could not find one witness who could tie the ARA bank robbers, Strassmeier, or Elohim City white separatists to downtown Oklahoma City, McVeigh, the Ryder truck, getaway vehicles, or the bombsite. During Terry Nichols’ 2004 state murder trial, the FBI was forced to testify en camera before Judge Steven Taylor regarding the alleged involvement of Elohim City, Strassmeier, and the band of robbers in the bombing, which had been raised by defense lawyers. However, federal agents were loath to admit that not one member of the ARA bank robbery gang or the German national were in Oklahoma City on the fateful morning of April 19, 1995. All had irrefutable alibis.
But the judge was not convinced. In the interest of objectivity, he ordered the FBI to compare the convicted gangsters' fingerprints with more than one thousand prints gathered during the course of the bombing investigation. The result – no match. The judge then ruled that with established alibis, no eyewitness testimony linking the purported suspects to the crime scene, and no forensic match to the fingerprints, the defense team's supposition that the Midwest bank robbers, Elohim City residents, and/or Andreas Strassmeier moonlighted as mad bombers was nothing more than "hyperbole and a dry hole."
Judge Taylor did, however, leave the door open for the defense to call to the stand witnesses who could tie "others unknown" to "overt acts in the commission of the crime." Nichols' lawyers shrieked. The only perpetrators who were seen with McVeigh in Oklahoma City before that tragic day and during the placement of the bomb truck were Iraqi soldiers. Viewed through the lens of September 11, exposing McVeigh's collusion with Iraqi servicemen meant a certain death penalty for Nichols, who would have been characterized as a murderous traitor colluding with enemy soldiers to slaughter innocent Americans. The jury would have likely determined Nichols acted with clear malice, motive, and murderous intent - all the elements that the 2004 Oklahoma trial testimony failed to provide, which enabled Nichols to elude the death penalty once again.
FBI fails to clear Iraqi soldier whom witnesses call “the third terrorist”
As for the three hundred documents in the FBI archive relating to the undercover surveillance of Elohim City and the 1990s Midwest bank heist investigation, I expected nothing less. The FBI spared no resources to make the connection to right-wing zealots in an effort to satisfy the public's insatiable desire to produce the ubiquitous John Doe 2. However, out rightly dismissing that Elohim City might have served as a possible meeting ground for the Oklahoma bombers presented quite a quandary. Why? The FBI had two known informants in the rural compound, spiritual leader Reverend Robert Millar (FBI informant status confirmed in 1997 courtroom testimony) and resident Carol Howe, an ATF informant who did not accuse Strassmeier of association with Timothy McVeigh until after she had been tried and acquitted of federal explosives charges.
In short, the Bureau has been completely and utterly unable to connect the citizen militia movement, neo-nazis, and government informants to the 1995 Heartland bombing. Yet by failing to publicly debunk this decade-old conspiracy theory, the United State Department of Justice effectively dodges the questions it cannot answer, or will not answer. Why did the federal agents never question Hussain Al-Hussaini, an Iraqi soldier who has no alibi, whom multiple witnesses have placed in the company of McVeigh, in the passenger seat of the Ryder truck that carried the Murrah Building bomb, and behind the wheel of a getaway vehicle pursued in an FBI all-points-bulletin issued the morning of April 19, 1995 for foreign suspects?
And why, years later, has the Bureau refused to clear Al-Hussaini as a suspect in the worst act of mass murder in annuals of American criminal history? Andreas Strassmeier has been questioned and officially exonerated. The same absolution has been granted to the Midwest Aryan bank robbers who revered Timothy McVeigh as a revolutionary hero.
Congressman Rohrabacher’s misguided belief that domestic terrorists and/or duplicitous government informants have escaped justice in the slaughter of 171 men, women, and children, will inevitably turn up no hard proof in congressional hearings. In turn, this public charade will inoculate the American people to the truth embodied in my book, The Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to Oklahoma City Bombing.
In May 2005, Chicago lawyer David Schippers, the former chief prosecutor for the 1998 impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, conducted lengthy videotaped interviews with the principal confidential witnesses featured in The Third Terrorist. He stated that as a 45-year practicing attorney and former federal prosecutor, he could deliver “a grand jury indictment against Hussaini Al-Hussaini with one day of testimony!” There are 22 witnesses whose testimonies are begging to be heard. There are 171 victims who depend on those voices. I am waiting on law enforcement and Congress to do the right thing.
Even McViegh's lawyer Steven Jones said in his book, "Others Unknown" that Nichols met with Yousif.
Can we have an Ann Coulter rule for Jayna Davis? Even her drawing in the WSJ looks good.
BTTT and bookmark. Thanks for the new info and links.
Grassy Ass
bttt
Oops, don't click that - go to namebase.org, do proximity search with Rohrabacher.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1608606/posts
Ramzi Yousef, Oklahoma City, and Al Qaeda: Linked in Documents?
I have to admit that Clinton and his antics had me fooled. I really bought into the idea that a crazy white guy had a bone to pick and acted on his own or with a couple buddies.
A certain book really opened my eyes to serious gaps and questions that are due serious answers. I started to read a bit more about the happenings.
I think the Clinton regime buried this in order to keep the liberal agenda alive. His liberal agenda was based on the idea that Al qaeda ( or any other terrorist entity) really thinks they have won the war the instant their enemy begins to battle back.
I really think he had the idea that the only way to beat them was to deny them battle alltogether.....like they would just give up and go on to something else. This resulted in attacks that gained frequency and scale culminating in 9 11. Failure to admit that today is where I think all the bush hate comes from....frustration from being so wrong.
Now maybe I am simply nuts and finding things in ideas that make no sense in reality but one truth I know.....Clinton would not go after Saddam no matter what.
He would have lost his liberal base support so action was a non starter.
One question, I saw a picture of jose padilla next to a sketch of a possible third terrorist. Is it my imagination that I see similarities there? Am
i a looney tune for thinking that maybe, just maybe this would explain all the hub bub about him?
Gorelick was "the fixer" alright. OKC, TWA800, 9-11, all covered up to hide the incompetence, malfeasance, and corruption of the Clintons.
I would say that her intelligence and resolve that she has shown command an entrance to that rule. I would say though, that should up to her. :)
After her being on the side of the 9 11 commissions panel that she sat on I would offer she has a wicked set of "tools" that support her being labeled a "fixer".
Everything I have seen says that she should have been answering questions rather than asking them or pondering answers given.
That Padilla had a resemblance was a total coincidence.
Clinton used OKC to save his presidency and get those on his side to dig in their heels and battle us --- the vast right wing conspiracy. He did it brilliantly.
Clinton cared only about a domestic agenda and keeping people dumb and happy. That got him re-elected and saved his conviction in the senate. Remember --- it's the economy, stupid. He knew that is what people cared about, and he used it to his advantage. He did not want to confront Iraq and have a costly foreign war. Dubya did that because he is a true commander in chief. But look at what it has done to Dubya's ratings.
We had 9-11 because Clinton would not deal with Islamic terror. Until 1998, he tried to make everyone believe that domestic terror was our greatest threat.
This is a little off the subject....but was there ever an investigation concerning the suicide bomber who blew himself up at the Oklahoma vs.K-State game last fall? Seems like I remember he had questionable ties to an Islamic group in OKC, but after a few days the news died out.
Thanks doug.
ABout the ratings though. I don't think it is his actions that made them low. I think most people approve of his actions and the pollsters ask pointed questions that mislead people into giving them the results they are seeking in their poll.
Do you approve of the presidents actions in Iraq?
People that want less or no action in Iraq will answer no to this question.
OTOH people that want more action in Iraq will also answer no.
Pollsters will lump both no answers together in order to gain the negative impression even though they are direct opposites.
I offer that it is the MSM and the pollsters that play the game with them that make it appear W is on the losing end of poll numbers. I think that the Kerry (and even gore) exit polls show that W has alot more support than what is portrayed.
I agree that clinton turned us onto the idea we have a serious domestic threat. We do and that enemy consists of our MSM and the liberal left.
More likely they buried it because Clinton blamed Talk Radio and the Right Wing for the bombing. The lift he got from the bombing probably saved his reelection to his second term. I don't think he cared much one way or another about Al Qaeda, until he needed a "Wag the Dog" opportunity on the eve of his impeachment.
BTTT
After her being on the side of the 9 11 commissions panel that she sat on I would offer she has a wicked set of "tools" that support her being labeled a "fixer".
Everything I have seen says that she should have been answering questions rather than asking them or pondering answers given.
In a more just world, this treasonous b*tch would be found hanging from a lamp-post.
WTOMP
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.