DISCUSSION ABOUT:
"Dutch MP says Stay-At-Home Mothers should be Punished for Throwing Away Education"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FreepMail wagglebee.
Unlike dykes, real women /mothers need to be smarter than their children. Sounds like Ms Dijksma could have done with a bit more education herself to understand the dynamics.
Human beings aren't puppies. Well, maybe the socialist ones...
They really do see us as revenue producing drones.
In their minds, the old fashioned ways of the drones parenting methods, are no longer efficient enough for the modern state.
"...one of the central tenets of socialism which says women can only have value when they are in the paid labour force and that motherhood and childrearing is a form of slavery."
I have absolutely no doubt what-so-ever that Hillary totally agrees with this statement. Which is why it should be on every bill board with her face next to it.
With his logic, no one should be allowed to throw away their education. No one should be allowed to be on welfare either. He is calling stay at home mothers a burden, all welfare certainly is then a burden.
Too bad her mother wasn't sterile.
My take is that you always have many, many years to use that education career-wise. But only a few years to take care of children.
For another thing, most stay-at-home mothers ARE in the paid labor force for some part of their lifespan, typically either before the babies come, or after they're all grown up and have left the nest.
You can have it all... just not all at the same time...
No kidding.
In a country that is dying because it is not producing enough vhildren it is ludicrous to say that children are a waste.
Because of her attitude, in 30 years, the Netherlands will be majority Muslim; she will be wearing a burkha, and if she opens her mouth to spew her bile, Achmed will smash her in the face with a rifle butt.
Related article: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/946
Basically it would convert an education grant into an education loan if the person doesn't actually make productive use of their taxpayer subsidized higher education. There are men too who will study, get a degree and never make use of that degree in that field. Perhaps any publicly funded grants they are awarded should also be converted to loans.
The same socialists that believe that big government can change the weather, also believe they can reengineer human nature. Their ultimate Utopian accomplishment will come when when they have, through a massive government effort, reached for the benifit of all mankind, that illusive pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
For a good look at socialism given free reign to take the burdon of raising children from the productive worker, check this out:
http://www.cnd.org/HYPLAN/yawei/orphan/index.html
I've been told that I'm wasting my education staying home with my children. When people say that, it tells me a lot about their values.
There is nothing wrong with an educated population, in this case we're talking "highly educated" women. But when those women have their higher education paid for by tax dollars and don't move into the working world, what do the tax payers get out of the deal? Why should they pay for just a few select to be highly educated mothers and not all women? If they don't use the education, the grants should be converted to loans just like all those who couldn't get grants must carry loans as a burden of their becoming "highly educated."
This isn't about basic education which benefits all by (in theory) keeping you from turning to crime, off welfare and into a contributing member of society on some level.
A highly educated woman who chooses to stay home and not to work: that is destruction of capital
Welcome to the future everyone. An entire generation of leftists have had their way to redistribute the earnings of hard working citizens to fulfill their dream of utopia. Now we are about to enter Phase 2...where leftists will make judgments on how everyone should spend "their" money.
Coming to a Congressional session near you...
Oh they understand it. That's why they're agin' it. They know that traditional values are antithetical to both the aims and means of socialism.
So homeschooling is *throwing away my education*? I don't think so. I was a much better teacher to my kids for it and they got a much better education for it. When I finished up my degree, I hadn't even heard of homeschooling so it was not a factor in getting my degree but it sure paid dividends I didn't expect. It gave me the opportunity to better prepare my kids to be successful, productive members of society.
ping