Posted on 04/03/2006 8:13:43 AM PDT by doug from upland
ROHRBACHER DEMANDING NEW PROBE OF OKC
Jayna Davis and I had an interesting phone conversation this morning. She is still waiting for a plane ticket to D.C. and an invitation to testify about the OKC bombing. Neither has been forthcoming.
Is it good news that Rep. Dana Rohrbacher (R-CA) is demanding a new probe of the OKC bombing? Maybe. But is it going to really get to the truth about the Middle Eastern connection to OKC? Maybe not.
Last year, David Schippers, famous for prosecuting both the Chicago mob and William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, flew to OKC to meet Jayna and her witnesses. Dave spent 12 hours grilling 14 of them on camera.
When he was finished, he told Jayna that, with just three of them, he would get a federal indictment of Hussain al-Hussaini in one day. FBI agent Dan Vogel told her he could do the same -- with one of her witnesses. That is how credible they were.
So why, Congressman Rohrbacher, did you tell Jayna that the committee has no budget to fly her to Washington, D.C.? What is the problem? Are we finally going to get the truth or is this grandstanding?
Andreas Carl Strassmeier has six witnesses saying that he was building a fence at the time of the bombing. He couldn't have been with McVeigh. Of 1100 fingerprints tied to the crime scene, none are Strassmeier's. Not one of 30,000 witnesses ties Strassmeier to the crime.
Here is a question for you, Congressman. Well, actually seven questions. Ten months ago, Jayna gave these to you in writing and still is waiting for the answers.
1. Why has the Justice Department/FBI not issued an official on-the-record statement exonerating Hussain Al-Hussaini of complicity in the Oklahoma City bombing? Has the DOJ provided Congress with Hussain Al-Hussaini’s whereabouts for the critical hours of the morning of April 19, 1995?
2. Why did the FBI never question Hussain Al-Hussaini about the bombing?
3. Why did the FBI previously suspect Al-Hussaini’s employer of ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization?
4. Why were the original motel registration logs where witnesses testified McVeigh checked in with Al-Hussaini’s Iraqi cohort the evening of April 18, 1995, never returned to the establishment’s owner?
5. Whatever happened to the brown Chevrolet pickup that was seen carrying Middle Eastern suspects from the bomb site? The Oklahoma City police found fingerprints inside the recovered truck. Why were these prints not compared to the immigration files of the three Middle Eastern nationals whom witnesses observed in that getaway vehicle before, during, and after the bombing?
6. Why did the Bureau rebuff my efforts to surrender the witness statements and supporting evidence in September 1997? Why did the FBI withhold from the defense teams the twenty-two witness affidavits that I delivered to FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel in January 1999?
7. Why were the prior warnings issued by the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare that predicted an Islamic attack in the “heart of the U.S.” disregarded as an indicator of foreign participation?
Congressman Rohrbacher needs to bring Jayna and Schippers to meet with the committee in closed session. The committee needs to see the on camera interviews of 14 eye witnesses. It needs to be done in closed session to protect the witnesses. They stepped forward as patriots facing great risk.
The real story of OKC should have been told long ago. Let's finally get it told now. Bill Clinton did not want to deal with Middle East terror on our soil. He wanted this to be domestic terror. That is what he got. Who are those deep inside the FBI who are responsible for continuing the coverup?
The truth about OKC will forever end any remaining legacy of the impeached William Jefferson Blythe Clinton. Had he dealt with OKC, 9-11 could have been prevented. He ignored Middle East terror, created the vast right wing conspiracy, and his Kool-Aid drinkers dug in their heels. He would be held accountable for nothing. They stood with him no matter what because they had to fight the dreaded right wing. That is how Clinton divided America as never before.
If anyone would like to join me in calling the congressman, he is at (202) 225-2415.
Call me a black helicopter watcher if you want, but something else is rather obvious to thinking people and has been for a time now.
Something else is at play and it involves people in power behind the front men we debate and argue over. The same people who put Bill Clinton in the Whitehouse are managing details behind the scene around Dubya's administration. I don't claim to know who they are, but certain things just make no sense unless some version of this nutty conspiracy actually does exist.
Cheers,
Lloyd
The person I knew in Houston who referred us to his in-laws' various motels had a different last name and he was Indian (from India), but I got the impression from him and from his wife that these Patels were Pakistani.
It was a long time ago, so I could be mistaken--it was just something that stuck in my brain, so I was being intentioanlly vague about their nationality.
They may have been Hindu Pakistanis, as their name doesn't seem Islamic.
I believe that is correct. The family I knew was all American by when I knew them -- and Presbyterian.
Never heard anything about a Nick Berg connection. I think he was just a foolish young man who should have stayed a little closer to home. I doubt if had the street smarts to go fooling around in a war zone, not that many of us do.
WRONG! Read the 1st Grand Jury's Charges. Google it and read for yourself, but here is the most important part that shows your statement is wrong:
The Grand Jury charges:
1. Beginning on or about September 13, 1994 and continuing thereafter until on or about April 19, 1995, at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, in the Western District of Oklahoma and elsewhere, TIMOTHY JAMES McVEIGH and TERRY LYNN NICHOLS, the defendants herein, did knowingly, intentionally, willfully and maliciously conspire, combine and agree together and with others unknown to the Grand Jury to use a weapon of mass destruction .....
WHY HASN'T THE FBI DONE IT'S JOB AND FOUND THE OTHERS?
Again, if you have three conspirators, and only two are caught, it is a defense atty's dream because you can "pin" it on the third guy. Why didn't either of the two attys attempt to do that . . . they DIDN'T EVEN BRING IT UP. THEY DIDN'T EVEN MUDDY THE WATERS WITH IT. Why? Apparently not enough there to even "muddy" with.
Oh, and McV and Nichols themselves, yep they were part of it too. Puh-lease.
Your very first post on this thread was wrong .... the 1st Grand Jury did charge "others unknown" McVeigh's atty went to great lengths to muddy the waters. He has been seen on many specials doing just what you say.... so your statements continue to be wrong. Please properly research your statements before posting false ones.
am sure FReepers could arrange airfare if that is the only thing blocking this woman from a 'global presence'.
what's gonna happen on this matter?!
They have the money for airfare. The point is that they need to be invited by the committee. The coverup will apparently continue.
read this tonight BUMP!
read this tonight BUMP!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.