Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Town Aghast After Grand Jury Fails To Indict Despite Sex Videotape On School Bus
San Antonio Express-News ^ | April 1, 2006 | Jeorge Zarazua

Posted on 04/01/2006 5:46:46 AM PST by texianyankee

Three Rivers aghast at lack of indictment in taped sex on bus

THREE RIVERS — Police in this small South Texas town are reeling in disbelief after a grand jury failed to indict a 17-year-old boy who was videotaped having sex with a 12-year-old girl on a school bus.

Police Chief Vance Roberts said the case was a "slam dunk," with the videotape serving as indisputable proof.

"I don't know what went wrong," Roberts said this week. "I haven't a clue.

"I felt like it was a strong case. I felt like it was a case that needed to be indicted, and I feel like the 17-year-old needs to face up to the charges."

The grand jury decided otherwise.

Because grand jury proceedings are secret, it's unknown how the 12-member panel reached its decision to "no bill" Rolando Zuniga, who was charged with felony sexual assault after the Sept. 30 incident.

But the decision in March sent shockwaves through the community.

"It's a shocker," said Three Rivers Municipal Court Judge Dawn Benham, who's also president of the town's PTA. "There is no other way to explain it."

The police chief said he asked District Attorney Martha Warner this week to consider presenting the case again to the grand jury.

Warner, district attorney for the 156th Judicial District with Live Oak, Bee and McMullen counties, said the decision surprised her but she wouldn't ask the grand jury to reconsider the case unless jurors asked to or unless there was new evidence to present.

"If the grand jury wants to revisit the case, I will do that," she said. "If they want to look at it again, they're more than welcome to do so. But, so far, I haven't received any calls from them."

Warner said she can't discuss what was presented before the grand jury.

Benham said she wouldn't have issued an arrest warrant for Zuniga last fall if she felt there wasn't enough evidence. She said the video from the school bus security camera was the most compelling.

"It was there," she said. "It was all in black and white."

Zuniga was arrested Oct. 1, the day after the 12-year-old girl performed oral sex on him while in the school bus, according to court documents.

Roberts said it was 7:30 a.m., and the bus had arrived at the Three Rivers school complex. Because Three Rivers is a small, close-knit town — popular for its hunting and fishing — students from the district's high school and lower grades are bused together to the clustered schools.

Roberts said the incident occurred after the other students got off the bus. He said the girl stood up and it appeared she was walking toward the front of the bus when the driver left, but instead she returned and sat next to Zuniga.

On the bus surveillance tape, the two can be seen looking around as if to make sure no one was watching.

Three Rivers Superintendent Mac Johanson said the district's bus foreman checked the videotape at the end of the day and notified authorities.

No disciplinary action was taken against the bus driver, Johanson said.

Roberts said that when the students were confronted, they admitted the encounter. The girl said it was consensual and that they were dating.

Zuniga couldn't be reached for comment. His mother referred questions to their attorney, Manuel Montes of San Antonio, who didn't return repeated phone calls to his office.

"We're not happy about it," high school Principal Kenneth Rohrbach said of the grand jury's decision. "We took the appropriate disciplinary action."

School officials declined to say what action was taken against Zuniga, but his mother, who declined to give her name, said he was expelled.

Warner, the district attorney, said she has spoken with the girl's parents and they weren't upset over the grand jury's decision.

"They want it to go away," she said. "Don't get me wrong, they don't condone what happened."

Sgt. Dick Poore, who investigated the incident, said it doesn't matter if the sex was consensual or how the family feels about Zuniga. He said it is illegal for an adult to have sex with a 12-year-old.

"If they want to change the law," Poore said, "they need to go through the state of Texas and have it changed."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: blowjob; clinton; clintonlegacy; legalsystem; moralabsolutes; publicschools; publikskoolz; sexcrime; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
Simply amazing....
1 posted on 04/01/2006 5:46:48 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

ping


2 posted on 04/01/2006 5:48:48 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
Sgt. Dick Poore, who investigated the incident, said it doesn't matter if the sex was consensual or how the family feels about Zuniga. He said it is illegal for an adult to have sex with a 12-year-old.

Wasn't the guy 17? That's not quite an adult.
3 posted on 04/01/2006 5:49:04 AM PST by Terpfen (72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

kids will be kids


4 posted on 04/01/2006 5:49:32 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

In Texas we abide by Texas law. If I recall correctly, one can be tried as an adult if 16 years old.


5 posted on 04/01/2006 5:50:32 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

You beat me to it.

Three Rivers Salsa Festival starts today.


6 posted on 04/01/2006 5:51:04 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Grand juries - beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

He's an adult in Texas.

1st degree felony.


7 posted on 04/01/2006 5:53:06 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Grand juries - beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

The "bent one's" legacy lives on!


8 posted on 04/01/2006 5:53:17 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Roberts said that when the students were confronted, they admitted the encounter. The girl said it was consensual and that they were dating.

I've seen 17 year olds with 12 year old girlfriends in South Texas - unfortunately, it's a parental & family problem....The law wouldnt get involved, of course. However, since this incident was videotaped on school property, I would think the law should have prevailed. I can imagine the make-up of the grand jury had a lot to do with this situation....

9 posted on 04/01/2006 5:54:44 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

We need to start requiring parental licensing classes, like driver's ed, so that parents like hers could have their certification revoked.


10 posted on 04/01/2006 5:54:51 AM PST by Albion Wilde (Total healing for Gavin IJN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Wasn't the guy 17? That's not quite an adult.

He's considered an adult under those charges in Texas.

11 posted on 04/01/2006 5:56:28 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

LOL! Yeah....I figured you were gonna catch this article if I didnt get it first.

I believe I've been to the Salsa Festival only once in my life - maybe back in '94 or '95 when it was held at the city park along the Frio. It was a nice small gathering then.


12 posted on 04/01/2006 5:56:51 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
I can imagine the make-up of the grand jury had a lot to do with this situation....

True. It's goes back to culture.

13 posted on 04/01/2006 5:58:13 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: radar101; RamingtonStall; engrpat; HamiltonFan; Draco; TexasCajun; razorback-bert; ...

South Texas Salsa!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off this South Texas/Mexico ping list.


14 posted on 04/01/2006 6:01:53 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Grand Juries - beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
This is so outlandish it raises questions: How influential are the boy's parents? Was the jury shown the video tape? Was the prosecutor's presentation strongly worded (Ex. He did this, which is against Texas statutes ----, and here's the confession and video tape to prove it), or was it presented in a mealy mouth way (Ex. Oh, it was just kids being kids)?
15 posted on 04/01/2006 6:01:57 AM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Maybe the grand jury was all illegals


16 posted on 04/01/2006 6:02:30 AM PST by MiHeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee

Just damn...


17 posted on 04/01/2006 6:03:10 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl ("Life is a box of chocolates. Eat them before they eat you ".---me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MiHeat; HiJinx
Maybe the grand jury was all illegals

Nothing would surprise me these days.

18 posted on 04/01/2006 6:04:23 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl ("Life is a box of chocolates. Eat them before they eat you ".---me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MiHeat

Or better question:

Maybe the 2 students were illegals and the grand jury didnt want to interfere?


19 posted on 04/01/2006 6:04:25 AM PST by texianyankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: texianyankee
It's just a guess on my part, but maybe the minimum sentence for the offense in Texas is so severe that the jury didn't think that the boy should be locked up for the length of time that a guilty verdict would have demanded.
20 posted on 04/01/2006 6:07:14 AM PST by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson