Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Successfully Fires Multiple-warhead Missile
Associated Press ^

Posted on 03/31/2006 11:42:18 AM PST by Conservative Canuck

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran successfully test-fired a missile that can avoid radar and hit several targets simultaneously using multiple warheads, the military said Friday.

Gen. Hossein Salami, the air force chief of the elite Revolutionary Guards, did not specify the missile's range, saying it depends on the weight of its warheads. But state-run television described the weapon as "ballistic," suggesting it's of comparable range to Iran's existing ballistic rocket, which can travel 2,000 kilometres and reach arch-foe Israel and U.S. bases in the Middle East.

"Today, a remarkable goal of the Islamic Republic of Iran's defence forces was realized with the successful test-firing of a new missile with greater technical and tactical capabilities than those previously produced," Salami said on state-run television.

It showed a clip of the launch of what it called the Fajr-3, with "fajr" meaning "victory" in Farsi.

"It can avoid anti-missile missiles and strike the target," Salami said. He said the missile would carry a multiple warhead, and each warhead would be capable of hitting its target precisely.

"This news causes much concern, and that concern is shared by many countries in the international community, about Iran's aggressive nuclear weapons program and her parallel efforts to develop delivery systems, both in the field of ballistic missiles and cruise missiles," said Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnews.canoe.ca ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; iran; irannukes; missiles; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Conservative Canuck

The Honorable Curt Weldon is not a FORMER congressman.


41 posted on 03/31/2006 12:29:03 PM PST by Flavius Josephus (War today is always cheaper than war tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck

Disinformation to attempt deterrance.


42 posted on 03/31/2006 12:29:32 PM PST by Sam's Army (Another unsuccessful attempt to refrain from posting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Oh, yeah, and a couple of Boomers in the Indian Ocean. :-)


43 posted on 03/31/2006 12:29:42 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Flavius Josephus

Ooops. Sorry, Congressman Weldon.


44 posted on 03/31/2006 12:31:55 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck
Chill, everybody... The President can't do anything because the American people aren't behind him. And the American people won't be behind him until half our cities are smoldering ruins, if then, because he's a liar and always exaggerates these "threats." So what alternative does he have? He can't do anything. He's a lame duck. </tiresome liberal MSM BS>


How about we nuke 'em first?

45 posted on 03/31/2006 12:33:03 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman; All

MIRVs (Multiple Independant Re-entry Vehicles) are completely different animals: they're warheads attached to ICBMs, which actually leave the atmosphere. I agree, that's way ahead of their capabilities now.

We're talking MITWs here (Multiple Targetable Independant Warheads), which can be attached to conventional missiles; which seems to be what they're doing.


46 posted on 03/31/2006 12:36:26 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

See Post #26. And what has he got to lose? ;-)


47 posted on 03/31/2006 12:38:47 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Does anyone hear really think that the US or Israel is willing to attack Iran and risk a full on invasion of Iraq by Iranian troops (there bigger next door neighbor)? If so I would love to bet that this won't happen for at least another year (or until Iraq has stable governance).


48 posted on 03/31/2006 12:40:07 PM PST by cccp_hater (Just the facts please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: cccp_hater

I should have done a better job spell checking (hear is here).


49 posted on 03/31/2006 12:40:54 PM PST by cccp_hater (Just the facts please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: cccp_hater

Hear, hear! :-)


50 posted on 03/31/2006 12:44:39 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: All

Dyslexic moment. MITW: Multiple Independantely Targetable Warheads.


51 posted on 03/31/2006 12:47:22 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Yeah. And we saw what happened to Saddam's 'elite Revolutionary Guards.' Bwaa ha ha ha ha ha!


52 posted on 03/31/2006 12:49:44 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: hershey

I have no doubt that, when the situation really demands urgent military action, THIS president will act first and ask Congressional permission afterwards. Congress is not the Commander in Chief, he is.

He is not the stupid cowboy the Left and the Euroweenies like to portray him as. However, he is a man who first and foremost relies on his own judgement to delegate to experts and then to render the big decisions in a timely manner so that they can be properly executed by the military. The Iraq intelligence miscues will make the scrub and interpretation of the Iran atomic program data subject to a very rigorous review. But if the capacity and intent (= threat) is there and unambiguous and the NCA supports action, he will act.

And not by feeble Carter/Clinton half measures either.


53 posted on 03/31/2006 12:54:08 PM PST by Captain Rhino (If you will just abandon logic, these things will make a lot more sense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino

Right you are. And he doesn't need permission from Congress, either. Sure, to declare and fund a War, yes. But my point is that wouldn't be required, with all the assets already in the neighborhood, as it were. :-)


54 posted on 03/31/2006 12:58:10 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle
" I hope they continue to believe it!"
Yea. Know what you mean.
55 posted on 03/31/2006 1:03:10 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck
That is absolutely correct. However, it is fairly well-known that the Iranians are working hard on a re-entry vehicle that was originally (and unsuccessfully) intended for the Shahab-4, which proved to have neither the range or the lifting capacity for an ICBM. There were third-stage stability issues IIRC. I would not expect a MIRV to be ready for testing for a couple of years yet and this one wasn't that if the story is correct.

We're safe enough in North America for quite awhile but Europe is emphatically not.

56 posted on 03/31/2006 1:32:37 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

We might be fairly safe in North America, but what about all the U.S. bases, economic assets, etc... they COULD reach? :-0


57 posted on 03/31/2006 2:12:27 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

True enough. Let's hope the Russians don't GIVE them one.


58 posted on 03/31/2006 2:21:27 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

It was one thing for them to get their hands on 'a nuke'. So much more different for them to put their 'nuke' on a MIRV ICBM.

Not good. Wonder what they are talking about in the Knesset tonight?


59 posted on 03/31/2006 2:23:52 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

What kind of bagels to order for breakfast? ;-)


60 posted on 03/31/2006 2:25:00 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson