Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservative Canuck
That is absolutely correct. However, it is fairly well-known that the Iranians are working hard on a re-entry vehicle that was originally (and unsuccessfully) intended for the Shahab-4, which proved to have neither the range or the lifting capacity for an ICBM. There were third-stage stability issues IIRC. I would not expect a MIRV to be ready for testing for a couple of years yet and this one wasn't that if the story is correct.

We're safe enough in North America for quite awhile but Europe is emphatically not.

56 posted on 03/31/2006 1:32:37 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill

We might be fairly safe in North America, but what about all the U.S. bases, economic assets, etc... they COULD reach? :-0


57 posted on 03/31/2006 2:12:27 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill

True enough. Let's hope the Russians don't GIVE them one.


58 posted on 03/31/2006 2:21:27 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill
We're safe enough in North America for quite awhile but Europe is emphatically not.

and the first thing they'll do is not only cry for help =- but demand it as their right = of course we will have no recourse as the mad man has no intentions of stopping there

67 posted on 03/31/2006 4:05:51 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson