[pissant]

he was right then, and he is right now. And he will crush his critics in history.

[teenyelliott]

The media spun it then, and they will spin it now, and the lemmings will buy it.

And the moonbats write the history books.

Go home , already. Aren't you up a little late??????

[SevenMinusOne]

he was right then, and he is right now. And he will crush his critics in history.

Exactly right - History will be very kind to GWB -

But for now each one of us should be doing all we can to inform others (in a non-hostile manner) about the facts regarding the WOT / Iraq -

The WH and RNC need to start again systematically laying out why Saddam was a threat, the connections between Saddam & terrorists & al Qeade (specifically) - And in the backdrop of this message regarding national security keep reminding Americans of the robust economy -

These are the keys to victory in Nov -

[Cannoneer No. 4]

Allow me to be the first to sling the Bushbot epithet.

I'm not on active duty, but I consider him my Commander-in-Chief.

[satchmodog9]

bump

[auboy]

Bump.

[Cannoneer No. 4]

Iraqi memo about intelligence precautions for a secret arab group in Afghanistan.

[quantim]

I tried, and failed, to fit the first paragraph into a tagline. ;-)

[Jorge]

he was right then, and he is right now. And he will crush his critics in history.

Of course. It's beyond me how the left can attack Bush for removing one of the most dangerous mass murdering dictators in our time.

Bush's enemies have lost all rational perspective.

[chaosagent]

Bookmarked

[Blackirish]

was right then, and he is right now. And he will crush his critics in history.

---

The United States of Mexicana will look kindly on him.

[pollyannaish]

Call it a gut instinct. Dismiss it at will. But I am so absolutely sure that he has been right that I no longer argue with those who disagree in real life.

I am willing to let history take its course. And someday they will hear pollyannaish's voice in the back of their heads whispering a very quiet "I told ya so."

[RedStateRocker]

"The President's arguments, dependent as they were on intelligence and its analysis, could have been mistaken, but if it is to be assumed that he believed them to be true, they did justify the use of force against the Iraqi regime."

IMHO This is the central statement upon which all else hinges.I know the moonbat left sees all sorts of conspiracies and ulterior motives but to me that belies the debate we ought to be having- do we really have the inherent authority to act unilaterally and preemptively? Maybe I'm just 'old school', a Taft/Goldwater republican in a post 911 age.

I think the President acted in good faith, and as he saw his duty to be, on the best available intelligence. But the concept that we can just go in and take out anyone we consider a 'bad guy' on the basis of what they *might* do is one I am not comfortable with. Doesn;t mean I cry for terrorists or don't think we should be preparing for a major piss-up with China but I don't know that I want to see any country have a world empire, even if it's us.

[Rembrandt]

GWB, "he was right then, and he is right now. And he will crush his critics in history."

All one has to do is to read the recent articles by Stephen F. Hayes in The Weekly Standard. The facts are beginning to spew forward and the links btwn Saddam and Osama bin gone are undeniable, unless you're a wacked out Dim.

[RoadTest]

"he was right then, and he is right now. And he will crush his critics in history."

He was right.

But now he's wrong to allow our Mexican border to be invaded. His administration is as though it changed Presidents mid-tenure. He was wrong to invite Ozzie Osborn into the White House and he was wrong to smooch the Saudi Prince and hold hands with him. Saudi Arabia is a persecutor of Christians.

[eyespysomething]

Ooo! Ooo! I know I know!! YES!!

Will Bush Have Been Right All Along?

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Also here

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

[freeperfromnj]

George W. Bush, and not his opponents, has known what he was talking about all along

BUMP

[Peach]

Any Democrat who didn't at least pause at the following relevation is too stupid to be in office:

(Zell Miller read this on the floor of the Senate):

Less than two months before 9/11/01, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper “Al-Nasiriya” carried a column headlined, “American, an Obsession called Osama Bin Ladin.” (July 21, 2001)

In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the US “with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.”

The same state-approved column also insisted that bin Laden “will strike America on the arm that is already hurting,” and that the US “will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs” – an apparent reference to the Sinatra classic, “New York, New York”.
March 28, 2004, NewsMax
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1106657/posts?page=1

[mad_as_he$$]

History will not be kind to Bush, not because of the WOT (if you can really call it that)but because he literally gave the country away. The same amount of military effort that has been put into Iraq could easily have sealed our borders airtight. If the borders were that tight there would be no need to "fight them over there" on the current scale. It could have been a small SpecOps war with assassination being the primary tool. No history will rate him as the President that truly sold the middle class's soul to the Fortune 500.

IF Saddam had a WMD program(s) it was half assed and no where near yielding usable results. As for freeing Iraqi's I could give a rats a$$. Most of them would slit your throat in your sleep for $10.

[jazusamo]

Yes he was right and for all the noise the MSM has made in denigrating him, the truth is coming out and getting harder to ignore.

Each bit of information and each person such as Bob Kerrey speaking out is just another nail in the coffin of the MSM.

I'm not a vindictive person but I am enjoying watching them squirm and having to print what 6 months or more ago they wouldn't have even considered printing.

[wtc911]

On Iraq - YES

On immigrants - HELL NO.