Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Pushes Congress to OK Immigrants
AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/30/06 | Nedra Pickler - ap

Posted on 03/30/2006 6:00:20 PM PST by NormsRevenge

CANCUN, Mexico - With Mexican President Vicente Fox at his side, President Bush gave Congress a long-distance push Thursday to open the United States to immigrant workers who have been sneaking across the borders to fill low-paying jobs.

"We don't want people sneaking into our country that are going to do jobs that Americans won't do," Bush said at the end of a private meeting with Fox, where the issue was on top of the agenda. "We want them coming in in an orderly way, which will take pressure off both our borders."

The meeting between the Mexican and U.S. leaders came on the first day of a two-day North American summit that also includes Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Harper, meeting with Bush for the first time since taking office two months ago with the promise of building stronger ties with Washington, said the two countries are moving past their "tension" over Iraq.

Still, he took a combative stance on their long-standing dispute over U.S. tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber, saying Canada would "pursue all its legal options" if he and Bush can't work out an agreement.

But it was the immigration debate, which has dominated the U.S. Senate this week, that took center stage in talks conducted in a beachfront resort surrounded by bikini-clad spring breakers. A new immigration law could affect as many as 6 million Mexicans living illegally in the United States — about half of all those who are estimated to have sneaked in from other countries seeking new opportunities they can't find at home.

Bush is pushing for a guest worker program that would let foreigners in low-paying jobs stay temporarily, which Fox says is a good first step toward some form of legal status for all Mexican illegal immigrants.

The issue has united the two leaders, whose friendship dates back to Bush's time as Texas governor but was strained over Fox's objections to the war in Iraq. But immigration has divided Bush's Republican party, with business interests who want cheap labor battling conservatives who want a get-tough policy against illegal immigrants.

Fox suggested the issue is largely out of their hands now.

"The matter is in the Congress of the United States and that is where the decision will be made," Fox said. "It is no longer between President Bush and President Fox."

But both leaders were clearly trying to sway the debate.

"I told the president there is a legislative process that's going forward," Bush said. "And that it may look cumbersome to some, but that's how our democracy works."

Bush added, "I'm optimistic that we can get a bill done."

The summit included plenty of time to be neighborly. The three leaders dressed casually in open-collared shirts and strolled together among the ancient Mayan ruins at Chichen Itza before sitting down for more intense one-on-one meetings. Fox planned a lavish dinner for his guests.

After spending the morning sightseeing, Bush had a few hours off before the formal meetings began. He used part of the time to work up a sweat in his hotel's gym.

There was tight security despite the fun-loving atmosphere generated by college students who have flocked to Cancun for spring break. Gunboats patrolled the turquoise waters off Bush's spa resort, and fencing kept out all but hotel guests. "I'd like to make sure you work more than you play," Bush joked to reporters.

The trilateral meeting was expected to be Fox's last, since he is set to leave office this year because of term limits. Bush lauded Fox for stabilizing the Mexican economy and improving the net worth of his people.

"That's important for the American economy as well," Bush said. "The more net worth there is in Mexico, the more likely it is the Mexican may be wanting to buy a U.S. product. And vice versa, by the way."

In his meeting with Harper, Bush sought to make the newly elected leader look good at home, making it a point to stress how hard the Canadian leader had pressed him on the softwood lumber issue. Harper "made an emphatic case," Bush said.

"I appreciate his steely resolve to get something done," the president said. "I appreciate your pushing."

But Bush didn't give Harper much of substance, saying only that "my intent is to negotiate in good faith and a timely fashion to resolve this issue."

___

On the Net:

U.S. Trade Representative: http://www.ustr.gov

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 1986redux; amnesty; bush; bushamnesty; bushrobusteza; congress; guestworkers; hr4437; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigrants; intifada; jorgewarbusto; mexico; mexifornia; nwo; pushes; redandgreendawn; threeamigos; tresamigos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,521-1,530 next last
To: All

I will go on record here...I tend to stay out of most of these fights but every once in a while I know more than others


Im a white guy in New Mexico...Unlike some of you I have seen the border. I have hired illegal aliens (a handfull) for day labor, (here it is dont ask dont tell). I have lived here for 35 years...and dont speak Spanish.

What gets me is most of this heated argument is wasted energy and people are arguing about abstractions that avoids reality. This has been going on a long long time and it will not change anytime soon Come look at the border.I dont care what you do you there is no easy fix.

Reality Check
The wall wont work period
More Border Patrol will help but not enough.
You cannot have enough people on the border to stop illegals from coming across. This is a bigger problem than can be solved by this President,this Congress or any President or Congress so you might as well calm down.

More later if anyone gives a dam




1,041 posted on 03/30/2006 10:30:41 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 946 | View Replies]

To: Serenissima Venezia
It's your quote.

Right. It's not on some website other than FR.

1,042 posted on 03/30/2006 10:30:58 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1038 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
He was asked about people being hunted.


1,043 posted on 03/30/2006 10:31:07 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
If you want to play dodgeball, fine, keep moving.

Obviously you can't back up your insinuations. Just making sure. Carry on.

1,044 posted on 03/30/2006 10:31:53 PM PST by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1039 | View Replies]

To: afnamvet
Thanks. He supports McCain/Kennedy's bill not the House version.

Other way around actually.

1,045 posted on 03/30/2006 10:31:56 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: All

'08 Bumper Sticker

"ANYBODY except a RINO or hitlery!"




Sessions and Tancredo '08

http://sessions.senate.gov/
http://tancredo.house.gov/

Monday, March 27, 2006
http://sessions.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=253171&&

“The American people are counting on us to secure our borders and restore the rule of law to our immigration system. The Senate Judiciary Committee today let the American people down by passing out a blanket amnesty bill. We've been down this path several times before, and it proved a failure.
“There was a real opportunity to take the steps necessary to fix our failed immigration enforcement system and while progress was made, we did not get there. The proper approach is to first fix the enforcement system and then to undertake a national discussion about immigration, considering how to justly handle those here illegally and what rules should govern future immigration levels. We also have not effectively dealt with the national security issues.

“I voted against the committee passed legislation because it rewards illegal behavior, will be considered amnesty by the people and will not restore respect for law. Fortunately, the House of Representatives has passed a solid bill, and there will be an opportunity to improve the Senate version in the days to come.”




http://tancredo.house.gov/irc/welcome.htm

"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907




Real Conservatives FINALLY
have a winning ticket in '08




Time for the real conservatives on FR,
be it Republicans, Independents or Democrats
(like Zell Miller and John O'Neill) to band together
and oust the looney left and RINO's


1,046 posted on 03/30/2006 10:32:02 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (It's ALWAYS a great day to be a Conservative Independent Voter AND a Viet Nam Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1030 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness

I'm telling you, it's a hoax.

Go listen to the 911 call on the N&O. The one where the first callers says they were called racial slurs.

http://www.newsobserver.com/1185/story/423471.html

It's the SECOND clip.


1,047 posted on 03/30/2006 10:32:23 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1036 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

My take is that the President mistook the question, and the MSM spun the answer. If he were directly asked specifically about the Minutemen now I'd bet his answer would be different.


1,048 posted on 03/30/2006 10:32:48 PM PST by cabojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1012 | View Replies]

To: afnamvet
Actually, no, you're correct, and the McCain bill has NO AMNESTY which is what you were trying to find out.
1,049 posted on 03/30/2006 10:33:06 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G
Obviously you can't back up your insinuations. Just making sure. Carry on.

It's just an attempt to take the thread off on some wild tangent and make it deteriorate into a food fight.

No logical person really believes that Bush favors the House bill over the one in the Senate.

1,050 posted on 03/30/2006 10:33:19 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Because the American people and his base believe that he did. If he was misunderstood then why not say so when directly asked. All the administration would have to say is "no, the president was not referring to the minutemen".

Tell ya what .. I'll send him and email and ask him to sign up as a freeper to clear this all up

1,051 posted on 03/30/2006 10:33:24 PM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1012 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
"do jobs that Americans won't do for that wage."

Is that better?

Yes, but quite often Americans have to pay taxes on that wage.

1,052 posted on 03/30/2006 10:33:45 PM PST by OldEagle (May you live long enough to hear the legends of your own adventures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cabojoe

Ding, ding, ding. The press TRIED to trap him.

Misunderestimated again.


1,053 posted on 03/30/2006 10:33:46 PM PST by onyx (Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

lol.. I try and not bring some of that stuff on FR, we already have enough controversies. We sailed thru the canal some years back and didn't see one chinese restaurant anywhere.

altho I will gladly spit on the Peanut President's grave for signing away the canal.


1,054 posted on 03/30/2006 10:33:46 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1040 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Those who oppose Bush's amnesty, excuse me - guest-worker plan - have been generally called names usually reserved for newly zotted trolls.

You mean live Open Border Lovers?

Face it, it goes both ways.

1,055 posted on 03/30/2006 10:34:22 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1034 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

Sure I can, but you're too lazy to use a search engine.


1,056 posted on 03/30/2006 10:34:47 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta; Howlin; BigSkyFreeper

Are they still on this? Is this some weird form of obcessive-compulsive disorder?

How about an analogy: If someone asked me what I thought of Howlin and BigSkyFreeper, and I said I thought people without logical thought processes shouldn't post....the question and my answer would be assumed to be unrelated?


1,057 posted on 03/30/2006 10:35:22 PM PST by Serenissima Venezia (Stop the “No Illegal Alien Left Behind Act” – call/email/fax/write your Senators today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1032 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper


Don't give an inch or a goggle.


1,058 posted on 03/30/2006 10:35:29 PM PST by onyx (Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
altho I will gladly spit on the Peanut President's grave for signing away the canal.

I'll meet you in Little Rock and we can do a "two-fer."

1,059 posted on 03/30/2006 10:35:30 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1054 | View Replies]

To: cabojoe
My take is that the President mistook the question, and the MSM spun the answer. If he were directly asked specifically about the Minutemen now I'd bet his answer would be different.

It's not the MSM that are spinning it - conservative websites picked up on it too.

If Bush mistook the question then why hasn't he set the record straight? Why did he use the exact word that President Fox had been using for weeks to describe the Minutemen? Why did Condeleza Rice use almost the exact same words a few days before when asked specifically about the Minutemen?

1,060 posted on 03/30/2006 10:35:57 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,521-1,530 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson