Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to test 700-tonne explosive(will send mushroom cloud over Las Vegas)
Breitbart.com ^

Posted on 03/30/2006 8:54:13 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME

The US military plans to detonate a 700 tonne explosive charge in a test called "Divine Strake" that will send a mushroom cloud over Las Vegas, a senior defense official said.

"I don't want to sound glib here but it is the first time in Nevada that you'll see a mushroom cloud over Las Vegas since we stopped testing nuclear weapons," said James Tegnelia, head of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

Tegnelia said the test was part of a US effort to develop weapons capable of destroying deeply buried bunkers housing nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.

"We have several very large penetrators we're developing," he told defense reporters.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161 next last
To: SandyInSeattle

Yah...me and my daughter and grandkids!!!

They're doing that because I'm moving, right?


81 posted on 03/30/2006 9:34:20 AM PST by Monkey Face (Dictators are rulers who look good until the last ten minutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Maybe Divine Strike is aimed more at an Iranian audience. We dropped leaflets over Japan in the week preceding the first atomic bomb to let them know that a terrible fate awaited them if they didn't surrender immediately.


82 posted on 03/30/2006 9:34:56 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax

I'm sure you could. If you figure that the tests were done when there wasn't much wind the clouds would have reached about 60,000 ft. Most of that is water vapor though, caused by the change in air pressure.

Back then, Las Vegas was a town of about 25,000 anyway.


83 posted on 03/30/2006 9:37:15 AM PST by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Uh... how do you deliver 700 tons? Strikes me as rather a lot to carry?

It's not quite as much, but a C-5 can carry 130 tons. But it would be a hell of a thing to get it to airdrop that.

84 posted on 03/30/2006 9:37:23 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
"Reading into that, it is a test of the blast effect and fallout from a sub-kiloton, deep penetration nuclear bunker buster."

Bingo.
85 posted on 03/30/2006 9:37:43 AM PST by Skywarner (The U.S. Armed Forces... Producers of FREEDOM for over 200 years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Good, Vegas needs to be reminded they are in fallout land.


86 posted on 03/30/2006 9:37:43 AM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax

Sure could.


87 posted on 03/30/2006 9:39:14 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

Next stop, Mexico City.


88 posted on 03/30/2006 9:40:43 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
how do you deliver 700 tons? - hope for a long fuse and run really fast

Pack it into an stripped out 747 and steer it by remote control. We have thousands of tired old airframes around, it wouldn't take much to get them flying again.
89 posted on 03/30/2006 9:41:26 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax

90 posted on 03/30/2006 9:42:46 AM PST by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: sgribbley
"planes that can carry 700 tons"?

We have no planes that can carry 1.4million pounds. They must be referring to the equivalent explosive power of TNT.

91 posted on 03/30/2006 9:45:04 AM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

actually, I think it's a designed to test the structural integrity of the underground nuclear waste repository..


92 posted on 03/30/2006 9:49:22 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her gene pool. Any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
"We have several very large penetrators we're developing,"...

Oh, this is a porno movie...

93 posted on 03/30/2006 9:49:36 AM PST by talleyman (Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole; FastCoyote

Yep, I read this a just a confirmation to confirm the calculation method. Not an test of the explosive, but the effects of that size of "bunker buster". The actually usage might be a strategic nuke that penetrates before the reaction.


94 posted on 03/30/2006 9:50:39 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Cool, they should setup a viewing area and sell tickets...


95 posted on 03/30/2006 9:50:56 AM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

tow it behind the entire inventory of B2's?


96 posted on 03/30/2006 9:51:16 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

"actually, I think it's a designed to test the structural integrity of the underground nuclear waste repository.."

I hope you aren't serious. I literally wrote a book on Yucca Mountain.


97 posted on 03/30/2006 9:59:57 AM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

It was a joke..I thought it would be obvious..I guess I was a little too tongue-in-cheek..


98 posted on 03/30/2006 10:01:01 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her gene pool. Any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

....how do you deliver 700 tons?.....

simple..... load it into 35 forty foot containers.


99 posted on 03/30/2006 10:02:55 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Yep, I read this a just a confirmation to confirm the calculation method. Not an test of the explosive, but the effects of that size of "bunker buster". The actually usage might be a strategic nuke that penetrates before the reaction.

Right. They are trying to evaluate the air effects of an explosive that size, at that depth.

That means we have a bunker buster nuke of 700 tons yield. We just want to make sure the radiation is contained.

I'm willing to bet the the soil used to fill over the explosive has some tracking agent in it. Then they could determine how much material was dispersed and how far.

100 posted on 03/30/2006 10:03:49 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Many women will support Hillary based solely on her gender -- and it will be praised by the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson