Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MediaMole; FastCoyote

Yep, I read this a just a confirmation to confirm the calculation method. Not an test of the explosive, but the effects of that size of "bunker buster". The actually usage might be a strategic nuke that penetrates before the reaction.


94 posted on 03/30/2006 9:50:39 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
Yep, I read this a just a confirmation to confirm the calculation method. Not an test of the explosive, but the effects of that size of "bunker buster". The actually usage might be a strategic nuke that penetrates before the reaction.

Right. They are trying to evaluate the air effects of an explosive that size, at that depth.

That means we have a bunker buster nuke of 700 tons yield. We just want to make sure the radiation is contained.

I'm willing to bet the the soil used to fill over the explosive has some tracking agent in it. Then they could determine how much material was dispersed and how far.

100 posted on 03/30/2006 10:03:49 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Many women will support Hillary based solely on her gender -- and it will be praised by the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson