Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/30/2006 6:43:14 AM PST by Carl/NewsMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Carl/NewsMax

He's not the only one...

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2006/03/condoleezza-rice-sees-significance-in.html


2 posted on 03/30/2006 6:45:52 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
We've got y'all's back on this Mr. Vice-President!

Cheney: Iraq Documents Show Saddam-Osama Tie

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Also here

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

4 posted on 03/30/2006 6:48:49 AM PST by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

"The vice president stressed that nothing in the new documents uncovered so far links Saddam to the 9/11 attacks"



its lines like that, that make the whole story useless


5 posted on 03/30/2006 6:50:16 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

This will be W's greatest legacy, challenging the cancer of terrorism spreading out of Saddams Iraq. If it had continued on, God knows what kind of beast, networking with terrorists round the world, would have grown out of that pit. And our children would have had to deal with it.


6 posted on 03/30/2006 6:50:27 AM PST by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Osama or not, Saddam was in bed with terrorists, and that was more than enough reason to get rid of his sorry carcass. Iran is next.


8 posted on 03/30/2006 6:52:57 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

I just don't think that the old media will ever admit their error in this situation if a link is found.
They keep hitting new lows anyway and have too much to lose.
We'll see what the new media can do with these stories but I am not going to hold my breath.


9 posted on 03/30/2006 6:53:17 AM PST by JerseyDvl ("Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"-Samuel Johnson to the Dems of today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething
Cheney needs to be on your ping list ... we've already got the evidence that Saddam had contacts with nefarious characters.

I'll ping him.

Before you may post this message, the following must be corrected:
Could not find anybody named 'VP Cheney'

Oh well ...

12 posted on 03/30/2006 6:58:15 AM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

The MSM - kicking and screaming - might eventually have to take a look at these documents. You'd think that a media so obsessed with obtaining government documents IN EVERY OTHER SITUATION - is taking such a blase - even hostile - approach to these documents. They seem to really fear that something will turn up that will exonerate Bush. They have so much capital invested in the "Bush lied about WMDs" scenario, they don't want a full examination of the facts.


19 posted on 03/30/2006 7:01:44 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

FINALLY! I was wondering how the Bush admin would beat this drum. I knew Bush wouldn't do it directly.


21 posted on 03/30/2006 7:02:55 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

I hope Cheney reconsiders and runs for President in 08.


25 posted on 03/30/2006 7:07:12 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
I'd like to make a single point here:

Often when someone cites terror ties, a doubter uses this response: "If this were true, wouldn't the administration be Shouting It From The Rooftops?" (For some reason, that exact phrase is always used - Shouting It From The Rooftops.)

Well, here's Cheney, saying there was a connection. I don't know if he's "S.I.F.T.R." (tm) but he's there in the mainstream media saying there was a connection. What the hell else is he supposed to do? He can only "shout" so loud, he cannot control whether the media picks up his "shout" or how they spin it.

But regardless, the S.I.F.T.R. "argument" (it never really was much of an argument) is officially dead. I don't want to hear it ever again.

27 posted on 03/30/2006 7:11:16 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Wasn't Dan Rather over there just before the war?

Can he attest to their authenticity? He knows when real documents are faked...

In a related story, Sandy Berger was seen entering the building wearing world record sized hip waders!


29 posted on 03/30/2006 7:13:17 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Cheney: "...we'll see a pretty complete picture that Saddam Hussein did, in fact, deal with some pretty nefarious characters out there,"


THIS MAKES MY MOUTH FROTH AND HEAD SPIN WITH RAGE!!!

Everyone knows that Saddam and OBL would never work together because they did not like each other. cBS said so a thousand times so it must be true!

OBL only offers a truce to the Crusaders whom he swore Holy Jihad against, so the war torn countries of the Middle East can be rebuilt.

WHAAAAAA!!!!
32 posted on 03/30/2006 7:28:35 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
BTW what is up with Newmax? I stopped visiting there because of an extremely annoying pop-up ad. Are they going to cut that crap out or what?
39 posted on 03/30/2006 7:43:52 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Excellent. The administration should promote the important finds in these documents like Saddam and Bin Laden relation as Vice President Cheney is doing.
45 posted on 03/30/2006 7:59:00 AM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax; jveritas; eyespysomething
This is great stuff. The administration is fighting back in multiple ways.

The American people will eventually know the complete truth because of these documents, and the MSM won't be able to do a single thing to stop it.

It makes my heart glad. :)

50 posted on 03/30/2006 8:50:32 AM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
It's absurd to say the Administration should find the "smoking gun" and publish it first. The problem here was that there are too many documents and too few interpreters. By the time a "smoking gun" is found, it could be 2010. The document dump is the only practical answer. It also has the advantage of letting the public discover any smoking guns, not the Administration.

Agree the MSM will suppress it as long as they can but, if something dramatic does turn up, it will become news. Just as the Swift Boat Vets could only be ignored so long, so it will be here.

58 posted on 03/30/2006 12:18:08 PM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Oh no! The Eagle Deli 2 dollah 40's and Del Negro 6 packs can be bought after 10 PM!

Guys, the only tragedy here is that Mountain Valley Brew Pub went under!

Send me a private message, we'll grab some beers next time my friends' band are playing in the area.


69 posted on 03/30/2006 1:40:06 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
This is so weak.

We invaded Iraq because, after 9/11, somebody's ass needed to be kicked.

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were off limits, for reasons of state, and Saddam had been wearing a "kick me" sign for over a decade.

The idea of a serious, operational connection between the secular sand Nazi Saddam and Osama the dreamer is farcical.

Events in Iraq have not gone as planned. This is unsurprising, because our prewar knowledge of the tribes of Mosul, Mesopotamia, and Basra was shamefully poor.

Plan A was having flowers strewn in our path. Plan B has not gone so bad, for an improv.

But Saddam and Osama? Absurd!

Trying to link them up now, because events in Iraq are discouraging, is a sign of weakness.

73 posted on 03/30/2006 3:53:01 PM PST by Jim Noble (And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Bookmark


78 posted on 03/31/2006 12:52:55 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson