[sure_fine]

"The vice president stressed that nothing in the new documents uncovered so far links Saddam to the 9/11 attacks"



its lines like that, that make the whole story useless

[epluribus_2]

"The vice president stressed that nothing in the new documents uncovered so far links Saddam to the 9/11 attacks" - no, just links Saddam to supporting the perpetrator. Justification enough for me for regime change.

[SittinYonder]

its lines like that, that make the whole story useless

Why? The line is correct.

[Dr. Frank fan]

its lines like that, that make the whole story useless

Why? It's ok for Saddam to be connected to Al Qaeda as long as he wasn't actually involved in the 9/11 attacks in particular?

That's not the Bush doctrine.

[alnick]

its lines like that, that make the whole story useless

I disagree. It is a fact that there has been no documentation as of yet tying Saddam directly to 9/11. It has never been asserted that that was the case. The democrats and the media have lied repeatedly that the Administration has made that claim. I see no problem with our side being honest and straightforward.

A connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda is quite enough for me, and I suspect most Americans.