To: buglemanster
It is probably the most remarkably foolish circumstance that I can recall: for a great free country to indebt itself so massively to the world's largest totalitarian state.
To: A. Pole; Willie Green; Paleo Conservative
3 posted on
03/29/2006 7:48:34 PM PST by
Clintonfatigued
(Bob Taft for Impeachment)
To: buglemanster
Forex?....at first I thought he was talking about rubbers and it was just a typo
6 posted on
03/29/2006 8:07:55 PM PST by
Armigerous
( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
To: buglemanster; snowsislander
If you really want to lose your cool, take a peek at the editorial below. But don't say I didn't warn you.
An Absurd Balance
8 posted on
03/29/2006 8:41:12 PM PST by
ex-Texan
(Matthew 7:1 through 6)
To: monkeywrench; Paul_Denton; MARKUSPRIME; driftdiver; Paul Ross; Gengis Khan; NZerFromHK; ...
Ping to more propaganda posted by ChiCom troll gogoman/ckwilliams/buglemanster
19 posted on
03/30/2006 3:39:29 AM PST by
indcons
(The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
To: buglemanster; tallhappy; color_tear; Havoc; Howlin; kattracks; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; ...
.... but Beijing says the build-up will have no impact on its gradualist approach to currency reform. Translation:
"The CCP change? Not in your life-time round-eyes!!!
Picture the following Mental Balloon text over head of the Beijing apparatchik making these weasely announcements to the Western Press Corps:
"Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
Stupid, short-sighted, weak-kneed, Corrupt, and hopelessly venal Westerners. We of the Communist Party are triumphing...and will so OWN you. We will soon put an end to your hopeless 'experiment' in republican (small R) self-rule.
And you won't even know what hit you when we take over."
42 posted on
03/30/2006 10:40:15 AM PST by
Paul Ross
(Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
To: buglemanster
"While China has been trying to relieve the problems, complaints are heard that the US has been slow in taking concrete measures to reduce its twin deficits and improve its savings rate. Seems to me a nice fat tariff on China's exports would answer the "twin deficits" complaints of the Chinese rather nicely.
43 posted on
03/30/2006 10:42:07 AM PST by
Paul Ross
(Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
To: buglemanster
What do they intend to buy with all that e-money?
46 posted on
03/30/2006 11:03:48 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Nothing can evolve which has not been involved)
To: buglemanster
Holding all that foreign currency really has helped the Japanese economy, eh?
50 posted on
03/30/2006 11:14:05 AM PST by
Antoninus
(The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson