Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I just can't resist another juicy evolution story. Apparently not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid.
1 posted on 03/29/2006 1:47:23 PM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: SampleMan

“We don’t really know yet why or how it happens, but it makes us wonder what else DNA might be doing without our knowledge.”

Maybe an Intelligent Designer???


2 posted on 03/29/2006 1:49:02 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

There's a Bill Clinton joke in here somewhere...


3 posted on 03/29/2006 1:49:22 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

self-improvement ping!


4 posted on 03/29/2006 1:52:16 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

ping


7 posted on 03/29/2006 1:57:33 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
Apparently not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid.

no scientist has ever claimed such a thing period

9 posted on 03/29/2006 2:04:48 PM PST by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
“Flexibility could help with DNA packaging, which happens any time you need to stuff DNA into a tight place,”

Why don't they just use an Acme DNA Stuffer?


16 posted on 03/29/2006 2:18:01 PM PST by Maceman (Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
>DNA could modify itself ...

Maybe DNA
has a sense of humor and
is effing with us . . .

22 posted on 03/29/2006 3:18:52 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
I just can't resist another juicy evolution story. Apparently not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid.

What an irresponsible thing to say. Your B.S. theory on how science works and how scientists work is just plain wrong. Science is properly set up so that no scientific theory is absolute unlike your absolute belief that Genesis is absolutely correct no matter what.

25 posted on 03/29/2006 3:31:02 PM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
“This fascinating and unanticipated new property of DNA has the potential to cause substantial damage to our cells...."

Sounds like a pessimistic democrat..The glass is half empty.

I prefer to be optimistic that this may be the key to the evolution of species whether under the direction and control of a higher being, or not....as you prefer to believe.

29 posted on 03/29/2006 3:48:58 PM PST by Rapscallion (Democrats: Supporting the conquest of America since VietNam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
Apparently not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid.

I was unaware that any leading scientists have made such a claim. Do you have a reference?
30 posted on 03/29/2006 3:51:14 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid.

Could you point us to a list of those who claim we know everything? Thanks

32 posted on 03/29/2006 3:54:30 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

Great post. Thank you. Let the debate begin again.


33 posted on 03/29/2006 3:55:17 PM PST by Rapscallion (Democrats: Supporting the conquest of America since VietNam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
But the team found that if a stem-loop forms from a particular sequence of DNA, one of the genetic “teeth” will fall spontaneously from that side of the zipper, and the weakened strand will eventually break apart in that spot unless it is repaired by enzymes in the cell. Fresco said this sort of activity seems akin to self-mutilation at first glance.

Reminds me of how often the crevo threads themselves "unwind" over time ;-)

(Heads for exit, running for cover...)

Cheers!

35 posted on 03/29/2006 4:37:26 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
“To a scientist, this kind of self-inflicted genetic damage appears unhealthy, the sort of thing that would cause undesirable mutations and could kill off the organism,” Fresco said. “Cells have evolved a complex DNA repair system to constantly repair such damage. But evolution has not, as we’d expect, put a stop to it. So we theorize it must be happening for some good reason that we have yet to uncover.”

This absolutely shows that the genetic mutation theory put forth by evolutionists is a fallacy. Cells have a complex DNA repair system. In other words, even if DNA mutates, it soon self corrects. That is the normal state of affairs. Mutation is abnormal. Yet evolutionists would have us believe that an unnormal, unnatural, impossible mutations occur virtually all the time in every single species. Right.

43 posted on 03/29/2006 5:02:15 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
The ability to evolve, itself evolves.
62 posted on 03/29/2006 5:43:15 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

78 posted on 03/29/2006 7:10:08 PM PST by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
How did DNA modify itself as reproduction had to be established initially?

That's, ugh... from the start.

93 posted on 03/29/2006 11:01:41 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

I'm sold by all this "evidence".



DNA "could" modify itself with no outside help, say biologists
"may" also actively modify themselves
"some" single strands of DNA are "capable" of
it raises the possibility
has the potential to
We can only speculate
"If" we have indeed found one way that DNA can change itself spontaneously,


95 posted on 03/29/2006 11:52:55 PM PST by WKB (Take care not to make intellect our god; Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

bump


98 posted on 03/30/2006 5:48:51 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

Can they rule out DNA being hit (altered) by sub-atomic particles?


108 posted on 03/30/2006 8:28:48 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson