This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 03/31/2006 10:37:17 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
.
|
Skip to comments.
Boehner hints a back down on 'amnesty'
The Washington Times ^
| March 29, 2006
| Charles hurt
Posted on 03/29/2006 7:15:28 AM PST by surely_you_jest
House Majority Leader John A. Boehner refused yesterday to rule out compromising with the Senate to expand the House border security bill to include a guest-worker program or provisions that opponents call "amnesty." "Let's wait and see what the Senate can produce," he told reporters yesterday when asked whether House Republicans would reject the Senate Judiciary Committee's proposal to allow the estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the U.S. to seek citizenship after paying a fine.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; guestworker; illegalimmigration; illegals; mexico; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,821-1,840, 1,841-1,860, 1,861-1,880 ... 2,061-2,064 next last
To: Rebelbase
What is your point? You seem to want to fight with me over your identifying with the term "menopausal bushbot housewife league".ROTFLMAO! I love it.
To: Miss Marple
"We have many who attend our church and actually dress up and their children are well-behaved, unlike some of the Anglos. I also have had contact with them in restaurants and in landscaping work I have had done, and they were the hardest working people I have ever met."
______________________________
I have had the same experience.
I think the sending them home to apply for guest worker status is a non-starter. I think we will end up with some type of legal status for those that are already here and my hope is that the fence is built to stop the flow of illegals in the future.
1,842
posted on
03/30/2006 8:21:02 AM PST
by
wmfights
(Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The WAY!)
To: StarCMC
Okay, understood. And I'll keep an eye out! We're probably heading up for a visit Saturday evening.
1,843
posted on
03/30/2006 8:24:12 AM PST
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: Souled_Out
From reading some of Coop's posts, he sounds like he can handle whatever comes his way. You're starting to catch on. :-) Did a buddy FReepmail you?
1,844
posted on
03/30/2006 8:25:11 AM PST
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: Coop
"Are you said keyboard coward? If not, I'm afraid I'm not following you."
Still have that problem of not being able to think through logical processes?
"I meet our brave troops virtually every day. "
Now is your chance to meet them in person and express your heartfelt feelings towards them.
"I'm not picking a meeting place until you set the agenda"
The meeting agenda is to present you with a lifetime reminder of the respect our fighting men deserve.
"Sweetie"
Again with the gay stuff?
To: Souled_Out
Now is your chance to meet them in person and express your heartfelt feelings towards them. Thanks, but I do that quite often without your assistance.
The meeting agenda is to present you with a lifetime reminder of the respect our fighting men deserve.
I dunno. Still sounds kinda like a threat. You're really not very good at this, are you?
1,846
posted on
03/30/2006 8:28:08 AM PST
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: Coop
"You're starting to catch on. :-) Did a buddy FReepmail you? "
No, should they?
To: Souled_Out
Yeah, someone probably should help you out, before you get the rope fully knotted around your neck. Let me feed you a few more feet of line...
1,848
posted on
03/30/2006 8:29:32 AM PST
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: Coop
"You're really not very good at this, are you?"
Apparently not, long time member with very few posts. :~)
To: Don'tMessWithTexas
Hey Danny Boy, I never said that I was in favor of amnesty. I simply asked you to outline how you would implement a program. You are wound up a bit too tight, dude. Take a pill and chill out. I'm gonna go and get some air.I didn't read where you said you were against Bush's and the GOP proposals, either.
Yours and the GOP's solution is to give the lawbreakers what they want.
My solution is to start actually enforcing the laws already on the books. Like the one that fines employers $10,000 per day per violation. Want to take a stab at how many fines were levied by Bush's ICE last year?
The Border Patrol rounded up and deported 422 illegals in Temecula in 2004. It sent shockwaves through the illegal community and their apologists.
Did the Bush administration support the Border Patrol's actions? They did NOT. Instead, Bush's man at ICE, Asa Hutchinson stopped the sweeps and repremanded the agents responsible. (Union official: Frustration grows at Temecula Border Patrol station, Bush official slammed for stopping illegals sweeps)
Asa said that while the sweeps were legal, they violated policy because they hadn't been cleared through Washingon.
This is the GOP solution to the problem of illegals. And from what I can tell from your musings, it is your solution, too.
If I'm wound up, it's because of yellow-bellied sap-suckers like you and the GOP who throw down your weapons and throw up your arms at the sight of 12 million Mexican illegal aliens.
Remember the Alamo?
I guess Santa Anna won after all, didn't he?
Don't mess with Texas, indeed. More like, TexansKissMexicanButts, if you ask me.
To: Altair333
"If the people on the border don't believe that the wall will have the effect that people here think, then we ought to reconsider it," he said. The first time that anybody has ever listened to the people on the border and this is all that he got out of it?
1,851
posted on
03/30/2006 8:35:40 AM PST
by
wyattearp
(The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Remember the Alamo? I guess Santa Anna won after all, didn't he? Yeah, Santa Ana had a pretty decisive victory there. A+ for your history knowledge, C- for its relevance.
1,852
posted on
03/30/2006 8:36:17 AM PST
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: AmericanInfidel0; Laurita; CMS; The Sailor; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; Defender2; OneLoyalAmerican; ...
To every service man or woman reading this thread.
Thank You for your service to our country.
No matter where you are stationed,
No matter what your job description
Know that we are are proud of each and everyone of you.
Please accept our apology for those on this forum
who would rather push party talking points
rather than acknowledge the disgrace to the American flag
and to those who died protecting it.
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
1,854
posted on
03/30/2006 8:40:06 AM PST
by
DollyCali
(Don't tell GOD how big your storm is -- Tell the storm how B-I-G your God is!)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
You're welcome to the first, and cry me a river on the second.
1,855
posted on
03/30/2006 8:40:35 AM PST
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Please take me off your ping list.
1,856
posted on
03/30/2006 8:42:41 AM PST
by
Rokke
To: Coop
Uh...I would not call the Alamo a "decisive" victory for Santa Anna in the least. While it is true that he killed all the defenders and took the old mission...what he lost in order to do that, both in the march to the battle, and in the battle itself was a horrendous cost.
And that is not to mention the ire of the people he raised against whom he was fighting that ultimately contributed to his overall loss of the war, and Texas.
1,857
posted on
03/30/2006 8:43:04 AM PST
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Jeff Head
Uh...I would not call the Alamo a "decisive" victory for Santa Anna in the least. While it is true that he killed all the defenders and took the old mission...what he lost in order to do that, both in the march to the battle, and in the battle itself was a horrendous cost. And that is not to mention the ire of the people he raised against whom he was fighting that ultimately contributed to his overall loss of the war, and Texas. I would. It was put into the context of the Alamo... period.
Yes, he won the battle but lost the war. Muis bien!
1,858
posted on
03/30/2006 8:44:26 AM PST
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: Coop
cry me a river on the second You do not believe that such a showing of the American flag was a disgrace? Or that is has any meaning?
While its overall relevence may be questioned at this point (but I do not believe it will be in the long run because as more Americans see it and are made aware of the true nature and extent of the problem, which that flag raising punctuates, they will be motivated to act), it is still a highly affrontive and disgraceful act on its own.
1,859
posted on
03/30/2006 8:45:44 AM PST
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Jeff Head
You do not believe that such a showing of the American flag was a disgrace? Of course I do. Again, context. Lumping that photo in with a salute to veterans is also a disgrace.
1,860
posted on
03/30/2006 8:47:54 AM PST
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,821-1,840, 1,841-1,860, 1,861-1,880 ... 2,061-2,064 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson