Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head
Uh...I would not call the Alamo a "decisive" victory for Santa Anna in the least. While it is true that he killed all the defenders and took the old mission...what he lost in order to do that, both in the march to the battle, and in the battle itself was a horrendous cost. And that is not to mention the ire of the people he raised against whom he was fighting that ultimately contributed to his overall loss of the war, and Texas.

I would. It was put into the context of the Alamo... period.

Yes, he won the battle but lost the war. Muis bien!

1,858 posted on 03/30/2006 8:44:26 AM PST by Coop (Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1857 | View Replies ]


To: Coop
I would. It was put into the context of the Alamo

In the context of the Alamo itself, his forced march through a blizzard to get there cost him eight times the men he defeated, and the battle itself cost at least that many again, if not twice that number.

That is not a decisive victory. I would call it winning a particular battle at an unbelievable horrendous cost that if persisted in and replicated would ultimately lose the war.

Yes, he won...but not decisively so. If anything, the Texans and their allies proved to him how costly his victories would be and in that way won their won decisve triumph in losing that battle.

1,862 posted on 03/30/2006 8:50:15 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1858 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson