Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 03/31/2006 10:37:17 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

.



Skip to comments.

Boehner hints a back down on 'amnesty'
The Washington Times ^ | March 29, 2006 | Charles hurt

Posted on 03/29/2006 7:15:28 AM PST by surely_you_jest

House Majority Leader John A. Boehner refused yesterday to rule out compromising with the Senate to expand the House border security bill to include a guest-worker program or provisions that opponents call "amnesty." "Let's wait and see what the Senate can produce," he told reporters yesterday when asked whether House Republicans would reject the Senate Judiciary Committee's proposal to allow the estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the U.S. to seek citizenship after paying a fine.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; guestworker; illegalimmigration; illegals; mexico; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,521-1,5401,541-1,5601,561-1,580 ... 2,061-2,064 next last
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
I'm not an agriculture expert, as you claim to be, but Austarlia seems to have most of it's agriculture in livestock.

Livestock doesn't require a lot of people since a few cowboy's can take care of a huge herd(etc.etc), it's not the labor intensive endeavor as picking fresh vegetables and produce.

1,541 posted on 03/29/2006 6:39:47 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I wish there was a kryptonite we could put at the border to keep Fox's hordes out.


1,542 posted on 03/29/2006 6:39:53 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1535 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
now LP....it's just no fun without Todd's rants.....lol

I thought he was banned from the IntraWebz...forever.

:0)

1,543 posted on 03/29/2006 6:40:03 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1522 | View Replies]

Comment #1,544 Removed by Moderator

To: Mo1
I think I recall reading something like 6 million have been deported ...

That's credible. Some fraction of them return. But as a fairly uninformed observer (yep), raw numbers are unsatisactory illumination on the issue.

1,545 posted on 03/29/2006 6:40:33 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1514 | View Replies]

To: onyx

ROFL


1,546 posted on 03/29/2006 6:41:02 PM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1528 | View Replies]

To: Thorin
Keep writing like this, and soon you'll be asked to go write speeches for George Bush!

I agree the writing is good but it's not quite there yet. Aside from denigrating Americans, you have to label them, "vigilantes" or "racists" or something. You also have to insinuate that Americans are lazy idiots... "jobs Americans won't do" and such. A touchup here and there and it's ready for a Bush speech.

1,547 posted on 03/29/2006 6:41:23 PM PST by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1534 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
For instance, consider the numbers of employers who received formal letters warning about possible fines for violating immigration laws:

Under Clinton in 1999: 417 employers
Under Bush in 2003: 3 employers

Well, you can't say that GWB hasn't done anything at all. It's not like there were only two letters. Or just one letter.
1,548 posted on 03/29/2006 6:41:27 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1500 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Instead it is creating division within our country and alienating the Mexicans, which could be a problem for us down the road.



We should give a $hit about Mexico or Mexicans because...?


1,549 posted on 03/29/2006 6:41:47 PM PST by trubluolyguy (I got an idea, and idea so devious my head would explode if I even began to know what it was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1408 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Pretend you don't know what an anchor baby is.

I know what an anchor baby is, and if you want to stop the practice you are either going to get rid of or amend the 14th amendment.

1,550 posted on 03/29/2006 6:42:00 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1533 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
>>>>>BS; he speaks in Spanish sometimes, but only after he's spoken in English and he never gives entire speeches in Spanish.

Bush gives radio addresses in Spanish on a regular basis, and the White House webpage has a Spanish version.

What is BS is having a president who speaks to Americans in a foreign language. One can't imagine, say, Teddy Roosevelt ever doing such a thing. In fact, TR would have considered it treasonous.

1,551 posted on 03/29/2006 6:42:52 PM PST by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1535 | View Replies]

To: arasina

I for one will be truly sorry to see you go.

Why is it always the clever ones?


1,552 posted on 03/29/2006 6:43:20 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1495 | View Replies]

To: gsan
This is precisely the problem.

We're looking to other nations to solve our problem.

As far as I know there is no analogue to the situation between us and Mexico, i.e. one of the world's superpowers sitting opposite a country with a stagnant economy, where half of the population wants to emigrate.

However, if pressed I would have to say that John Howard and Australia have done a pretty good job in this regard.

1,553 posted on 03/29/2006 6:43:34 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1532 | View Replies]

To: onyx
That Jorge stuff persuades me everytime.

It's a red flag.

1,554 posted on 03/29/2006 6:44:14 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1060 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance


LOL --- Oh come on, all 1528? SOME are pretty darn GOOD!


1,555 posted on 03/29/2006 6:44:59 PM PST by onyx (Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1529 | View Replies]

To: Types_with_Fist
>>>>I agree the writing is good but it's not quite there yet. Aside from denigrating Americans, you have to label them, "vigilantes" or "racists" or something. You also have to insinuate that Americans are lazy idiots... "jobs Americans won't do" and such. A touchup here and there and it's ready for a Bush speech.

Good points. I hope junior g reads you post before he submits a writing sample to the White House.

1,556 posted on 03/29/2006 6:45:39 PM PST by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1547 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
the clowns are very very catty

...in a clinically psychotic sort of way.

1,557 posted on 03/29/2006 6:45:51 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1522 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Of course, anyone who cares to go back and read the whole exchange will see that I did no such thing.

To: onyx
FREE SPEECH. It's ours, thanks to the Founders. Our to exercise and ours to tolerate, even when used UGLY against us by people in our great country ILLEGALLY.

Indeed. But 'free speech' doesn't extend to foreign nationals invading our country and raising their country's banner over our public buildings.

1,193 posted on 03/29/2006 7:07:43 PM EST by EternalVigilance

To: EternalVigilance

Indeed. But 'free speech' doesn't extend to foreign nationals invading our country and raising their country's banner over our public buildings.






Apparently, it does. Have you seen ANY of them arrested?
If so, PLEASE post the pics and articles here.

1,222 posted on 03/29/2006 7:15:46 PM EST by onyx

To: onyx
Apparently, it does. Have you seen ANY of them arrested? If so, PLEASE post the pics and articles here.

Not that it matters, since your comments are out of sync with what we were talking about, but here you go anyway:


1,230 posted on 03/29/2006 7:18:40 PM EST by EternalVigilance

To: EternalVigilance


Where was that and how few?

Not nearly enough.

1,244 posted on 03/29/2006 7:23:47 PM EST by onyx

To: onyx

LA.

1,249 posted on 03/29/2006 7:24:39 PM EST by EternalVigilance

To: EternalVigilance

I don't suppose you can find a picture of them with a FLAG, can you, since that's what you're claiming should be done.

For all we know, they are legal and were busted for drugs.

1,247 posted on 03/29/2006 7:24:27 PM EST by Howlin

To: Howlin
For all we know, they are legal and were busted for drugs.

Yeah, right.

1,253 posted on 03/29/2006 7:26:11 PM EST by EternalVigilance

To: Howlin
For all we know, they are legal and were busted for drugs.

Yeah, right.

1,253 posted on 03/29/2006 7:26:11 PM EST by EternalVigilance

To: EternalVigilance

Well, where is the damn flag?

Put up or shut up.

She asked you why none had been arrested and you tried to pass off a picture of some Mexicans boys.

I can assume that once again your mouth has written a check you can't cash.

1,261 posted on 03/29/2006 7:28:22 PM EST by Howlin

To: Howlin

LOL...you're delusional, as usual.

Go froth at someone else and mind your own business.

1,262 posted on 03/29/2006 7:30:08 PM EST by EternalVigilance

To: EternalVigilance
You're a damn liar, EV.

Here's the caption that you're trying to pass off as something it's not.

Officers of the Los Angeles Police Department ticket a group of students for TRUANCY in Harbor City, California March 28, 2006, after the students did not return to school following earlier demonstrations in Carson, California. The students were voicing their opposition to congressional bill HR 4437, a bill designed to strengthen the enforcement of immigration law. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Reuters - Mar 28 1:28 PM

Here's the link, bozo

1,274 posted on 03/29/2006 7:35:32 PM EST by Howlin

To: Howlin

Go bother someone else, Howlin.

1,281 posted on 03/29/2006 7:38:39 PM EST by EternalVigilance

1,558 posted on 03/29/2006 6:46:17 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1531 | View Replies]

To: gsan
Which country's immigration and worker program do you think is the best?

I personally like the policy that gives ME carte blanc. Especially if the host country is Italy.

As a matter of what is in any given country's best interest, all countries will assert a right to control immigration. But the program is to reduce those barriers and eliminate nationalism.

1,559 posted on 03/29/2006 6:46:52 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1532 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I know what an anchor baby is, and if you want to stop the practice you are either going to get rid of or amend the 14th amendment.

Or close the border. Or actually read the 14th Amendment.

1,560 posted on 03/29/2006 6:46:55 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1550 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,521-1,5401,541-1,5601,561-1,580 ... 2,061-2,064 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson