Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There are links in the original article to several items.

I have to go be mommy. I'll be back. :-)

1 posted on 03/28/2006 4:58:56 PM PST by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; SwatTeam; ...
The Document Refuseniks

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Also here

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

2 posted on 03/28/2006 5:02:30 PM PST by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething

They can ignore, ignore, ignore or even try to discredit all they want (which is what we predicted two weeks ago they would do).

However, the MSM needs to understand that no one is paying attention any more. When they lost their monopoly we saw clearly their agenda (for those who hadn't already seen it).

If they want people to start paying attention again, they should do what my old friend Mark Twain said was their duty.

Mark Twain did not say: "The duty of the press is to be agenda driven and avoid anything that conflicts with their agenda."

Mark Twain said: "The duty of the press is to print the truth and raise hell."

Two, or one, still believe this, but most don't understand what the truth is. And here, with these documents, the truth so far is that they exist, they tell a story and that story is being uncovered. In the end I suspect we will learn that the truth is not what they told us it was.


3 posted on 03/28/2006 5:05:10 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething

Evidence then is not evidence unless is proves what you want it to


4 posted on 03/28/2006 5:05:45 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething

Maybe they get interested if somebody told them the boxes were full of chads.


6 posted on 03/28/2006 5:17:48 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething

They know the documents tell us nothing new, when they haven't read them yet. They haven't been translated yet.

That tells you everything you need to know about these people.

They are still misquoting the 911 commission, when obviously even the commission didn't have access to this material.

I'm sure there were a lot of misgivings about putting this material out there for the public, but it was genius. We can see that everyone, the political establishment, CIA, State, and the press itself, has had an interest in shaping the story more than merely communicating the story.

Bush has gone over their heads to the American people. It was a hail-mary move.


10 posted on 03/28/2006 6:01:19 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething
Because they cannot even entertain the possibility that they may have been wrong, there isn't any new evidence that can possibly be produced. The media are ensconced in the leftist societal engineering camp which is the agenda of the democrat party, thus the media have a driving agenda to serve, to bring back democrat control of government that will usher in the tsunami of liberal leftist amoral social contract. Secular Humanism IS a religion that the media and their favored politicos worship and Judeo-Christian values are at odds with that social contract so the conservative direction for this society must be defeated by the media. Ultimately, when documents are translated that prove a clear connection (perhaps such as personnel lists for training at Salman Pak naming several of the 911 murderers) such documentation will be treated the way the Dan Rather fabrications should have been treated, and truth will be called a lie and lies will be their truths.
14 posted on 03/28/2006 8:48:02 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething

"And then there's the ubiquitous Michael Scheuer, a former CIA official who pops up in a silly and dismissive front-page piece on the documents in today's New York Times. He notes that "there's no quality control" when you just throw a bunch of documents out into the public domain."

The CIA controlled the "quality" so well they missed 9/11.


15 posted on 03/28/2006 9:36:26 PM PST by dervish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething
This is a natural extension of the Third Grader, tit-for-tat mentality of the loony left. They got led around by the nose so many times with the fake document of the month, that it would seem only "fair" that the Iraqi intelligence docs would be fake.
19 posted on 03/29/2006 6:32:03 AM PST by Jack of all Trades (Liberalism: replacing backbones with wishbones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson