1 posted on
03/27/2006 11:53:10 AM PST by
VU4G10
To: VU4G10
Wow, maybe Bush should listen to this. It may save a few Republican seats this fall! I, for one, will vote for the constitutional candidate if amnesty passes in the guise of a "guest worker" program. Bush be warned, the people of this country want to retain their soverienty!
2 posted on
03/27/2006 11:56:06 AM PST by
calex59
(seeing the light shouldn't make you go blind)
To: VU4G10
We need 2 fences. The first one about 100 yards inside the border. Make it 25 fett tall with all the razor wire, glass, etc. with armed guards, dogs, cameras, etc. placed in strategic places. Then a second fence about 3 foot tall right on the border. There would be no guards on this fence. We then put all our prisoners in between the two fences.
Mexico would have to guard the 3 ft fence or let our prisoners into their country. Do you think they may decide to build a fence too? I'm sure there would be a need to keep their poor helpless people away from this 3 ft fence too as they would be fodder for the bad guys.
Hey Vicente, you have NO power in this fight unless our idiot coward Congressmen give it to you.
To: VU4G10
More from this poll:
Seventy-one percent of Americans asked say they are more likely to vote for a candidate who favors tighter controls on illegal immigration, compared with 11 percent who would be less likely, according to an NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll conducted in mid-March.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3749708.html
4 posted on
03/27/2006 12:00:17 PM PST by
Gelato
To: VU4G10; HiJinx
A "We don't want our slaves freed!" ping.
7 posted on
03/27/2006 12:08:49 PM PST by
azhenfud
(He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
To: VU4G10
It's MORE than 59%. This is a winner for ANY candidate in 2006... 2008... IF they have the cajones to actively support it! It crosses over well from red to blue states and would eviscerate the Dem's come election time should a Republican embrace it.
8 posted on
03/27/2006 12:09:57 PM PST by
johnny7
(“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
To: VU4G10
I like Rush's comments about us not paying taxes anymore! He has a point!
9 posted on
03/27/2006 12:10:41 PM PST by
mr_hammer
(They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
To: VU4G10
Freedumb2003's Guest Worker Program
- Only offer jobs when a potential worker is matched to a true opening at prevailing wages (we could borrow from the Cal State system to determine "prevailing wages") to ensure we don't push down the local economy.
- Require that the guest worker apply from and in his/her native country
- Require and that there be regular "breaks" where they have to return to their country for 3 or 4 contiguous weeks per year.
- No family allowed, except for brief visits here. They worker can visit their native country all they want, within the normal limits of employment agreements.
- After a certain number of years of following the rules, they could apply for temporary permanent residency and them follow the standard path to permanent residency and citizenship now in place.
- The employer would be required to offer health insurance, at the most reasonable rates possible, and it would be mandatory for the guest worker to enroll and pay for it.
- No particular country would be "preferred" and participant slots would be reflective of the respective native country's overall population, with caps established by a commission.
- I think all this makes too much sense to ever be done
18 posted on
03/27/2006 12:57:22 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
To: VU4G10
Bush is tone deaf when it comes to his base. Or maybe he only understands Spanish.
To: VU4G10; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...
Limbacher Ping!
21 posted on
03/27/2006 3:04:59 PM PST by
HiJinx
(~ www.proudpatriots.org ~ Serving Those Who Serve Us ~ Operation Easter/Passover ~)
To: VU4G10
Free Republic Opinion Poll: Do you support or oppose H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005?
Composite Opinion
Support 92.2% 1,128
Oppose 7.8% 95
100.0% 1,223
Member Opinion
Support 93.0% 656
Oppose 7.0% 49
100.0% 705
Non-Member Opinion
Support 91.1% 472
Oppose 8.9% 46
100.0% 518
It's not even close folks.
28 posted on
03/27/2006 5:02:47 PM PST by
4Freedom
(America is no longer the 'Land of Opportunity'. It's the 'Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists'!!!)
To: VU4G10
AOL.com Illegal Immigration Poll
03/27/2006 - 7:15pm PCT
Would you support a temporary worker program?
No 58%
Yes 42%
Total Votes: 217,719
29 posted on
03/27/2006 7:28:24 PM PST by
4Freedom
(America is no longer the 'Land of Opportunity'. It's the 'Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists'!!!)
To: VU4G10
Polls: Illegals a Serious Problem in U.SAfter what the traitors in the Senate did today the story will be: "Polls: Mexicans say American citizens a serious problem for them in the U.S. "However" said a La Raza spokesperson, "not for long."
30 posted on
03/27/2006 7:48:43 PM PST by
swampfox98
(I voted for George Bush and got Vicente Fox. Phooey!)
To: VU4G10
In addition to the 4437 or similiarly strict immigration bill the U.S. congress needs to pass a federal law patterned after Prop 200 in Arizona. It's a very simple common-sense law that requires a voter to show a valid ID such as a drivers license or SS Card (new non-forgeable) before they vote.
32 posted on
03/27/2006 9:22:50 PM PST by
Mogollon
To: VU4G10
Most people in the United States(outside the Congress) think illegal immigration is a serious problem. A solid majority(outside the congress) oppose making it easier for illegal immigrants to become legal workers or citizens.
There, that is better.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson