Feingold joins the Ranks of Democrat Nutcases.
Posted on 03/26/2006 5:50:41 AM PST by Valin
While only two Democrats in the Senate have embraced Sen. Russ Feingold's call for censuring President Bush, the idea is increasing his standing among many Democratic voters as he ponders a bid for the party's presidential nomination in 2008.
Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat, insists his proposal has nothing to do with his political ambitions. (Valin: NOW STOP LAUGHING!) But he does challenge Democrats who argue it will help energize Republicans. "Those Democrats said that within two minutes of my announcing my idea," Feingold said in a telephone interview last week. "I don't see any serious evidence of that."
A Newsweek poll taken March 16-17 found that 50 percent of those surveyed opposed censuring Bush while 42 percent supported it, but among Democrats, 60 percent favored the effort. Feingold's resolution would censure the president for authorizing a warrantless surveillance program, which the senator contends is illegal. Co-sponsors are Democratic Sens. Tom Harkin of Iowa and Barbara Boxer of California. The White House argues that Bush was authorized to order eavesdropping on American citizens under his wartime powers as commander in chief.
Feingold said his sole purpose was to hold Bush accountable, but he argued that it's also good politics. "These Democratic pundits are all scared of the Republican base getting energized, but they're willing to pay the price of not energizing the Democratic base," he said. "It's an overly defensive and meek approach to politics."
Some Democrats have accused Feingold of putting his 2008 presidential ambitions over helping Democrats try to recapture the House and Senate in this year's midterm elections. Should Feingold run, his opposition to the war in Iraq, the Patriot Act and the spying program would help position him as the liberal candidate. Many also see his effort as a distraction at a time when the Bush administration was on the ropes over Iraq and a since-scuttled port deal. "It just takes us off discussions we ought to be having in this country on issues that really matter in people's lives," said Rep. Sherrod Brown, a liberal Democrat from Ohio who is running for Senate.
Some Republicans have been thanking Feingold for what they consider a political fumble. "This is such a gift," Rush Limbaugh said on his radio show. The National Review came to the same conclusion. In an online editorial titled, "Feingold's Gift to the GOP," the conservative magazine wrote that Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman would hug Feingold if given the chance. The Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a hearing Friday on Feingold's resolution.
Mehlman, visiting Wisconsin last week, skipped the hug and instead criticized Feingold. That reinforced an RNC radio ad buy in the state, in which a narrator says, "Call Russ Feingold and ask him why he's more interested in censuring the president than protecting our freedom."
Feingold's response, essentially, is bring it on. "I welcome their attempt to make a campaign issue of the question of whether there will be accountability for the president's breaking the law," he said. "They will remind people every minute that the president thumbed his nose at the law."
Senators are not going to be POTUS.
Feingold joins the Ranks of Democrat Nutcases.
Before he was ever elected here in Wisconsin he was for term limits. (I am convinced that's what got him elected.) Once he got to Washington D.C. however that idea was dropped like a hot potatoe.
He's such a fraud.
Joins the Ranks of Democrat Nutcases?
I'd call him a founding member.
1. AP
2. A Newsweek poll
3. Yah, the Dems are always thinking that any way someone can bash Bush is "must see TV."
It's a triple!
And they won't stop with Bush. - there will be a reckoning
And if the GOP has any brains, it'll nationalize the election and make that point ad nauseum in ads all over the country.
Well stated which tells me a lot of these folks are not Republican and not conservative -- only purpose here is to repeat the DemocRAT mantra which they do a good job.
I had the unlucky draw of shadowing the Dean for America website for some folks in BC'04. The pattern on here from the malcontents reflect the same pattern I witnessed on the Dean for America website. These malcontents can fool some Freepers some of the time but others of us are on to their little games.
Anyone that says they have been a lifelong Republican but doesn't see a difference in the parties is NO Republican and most likely never has been. Same with their mantra of not donating or supporting Republicans in 2006! They are frauds!
>Anyone that says they have been a lifelong Republican but doesn't see a difference in the parties is NO Republican and most likely never has been. Same with their mantra of not donating or supporting Republicans in 2006!
Exactly! As if there was no difference between the parties when Perot voters allowed Clinton to be elected.
No difference between Bush Sr, and Clinton either, right?
Isn't his name Frankengold? Not much diff between him and Al Franken.
I agree with you about Republicans vs. Democrats but...
Clinton: Waco
Bush Sr: Ruby Ridge
Clinton: AW Ban
Bush Sr: Imported Gun Ban
Clinton: Increased Taxes
Bush Sr: Increased Taxes
On the other hand G.W. Bush cut taxes and rolled back gun control. There is a huge difference between G.W.B. and Clinton. Not so much the father.
First thing I look for is: "AP". I wonder if Feingold coordinated this piece to time with his Admin attacks. Or does he assume the lapdog MSM will followup automatically, with the appropriate piece.
Bet he's funnier than Al Franken.
Or do you think that all 900 belonged to Republicans?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.