Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does fusion scientist 'hold the secret'?
Deseret News ^ | March 24, 2006 | Elaine Jarvik

Posted on 03/24/2006 2:36:30 PM PST by Some hope remaining.

He was ballyhooed and then discredited and then largely forgotten. But cold fusion pioneer Dr. Martin Fleischmann still holds the secret to a cheap energy source for the world, says a California company that plans to produce prototypes of a cold fusion-powered home heater, with Fleischmann as "senior scientific adviser."

The announcement came on the 17th anniversary of the day that Fleischmann, then a chemistry professor at the University of Utah, and his colleague B. Stanley Pons stunned the scientific world with news that they had discovered a room-temperature way to create nuclear fusion. The announcement immediately led to predictions that the world's energy problems were over. The Utah Legislature appropriated $5 million so the U. could perfect the technique and pursue patents.

But when other scientists around the world had trouble replicating Fleischmann's and Pons' work, the method was dismissed as a pipe dream.

Eventually, though, "when truth and justice are done," says David Kubiak, the University of Utah will bask in the glory of its association with cold fusion. Kubiak is communications director of D2Fusion of Foster City, Calif., and Los Alamos, N.M., which will be hosting Fleischmann and is setting up a lab using his "recipe."

These days, Kubiak says, the term "cold fusion" has generally been replaced by "solid state fusion," "low-energy nuclear reactions" or "nuclear reactions in condensed matter." But the principles are still the same — a fusion reaction produced at normal temperatures using hydrogen-loving metals such as palladium or titanium.

To start with, D2Fusion plans to produce a 2,000-3,000 watt heater that would never need refueling. Then the process could be ramped up to produce 30,000 or 300,000 watts, Kubiak says. That would eventually mean whole communities powered by this cheap, efficient, non-polluting, radiation-free energy source that would end America's dependence on oil imports.

"It's an extraordinary vista," he says, sounding much like the cheerleaders of cold fusion in 1989.

The inventor of all this sci-fi technology lives in the English countryside near Stonehenge, where according to Kubiak he doesn't have e-mail. "He's an old-school genius."

Kubiak says scores of labs around the world are pursuing cold-fusion techniques, some of them originally inspired by Fleischmann's work in Utah. Fleischmann and Pons originally built their device for $100,000 in the basement of the Henry Eyring Chemistry Building.

"There are a lot of variables in this process," Kubiak says to explain why many of the original attempts at replication of the pair's work met with bad results. It turns out, he says, that the quality of the metals used makes a big difference. "That wasn't understood at the time. So some pronounced it a fraud."

The researchers now working on the technique "are not tin-pot inventors working out of a garage," he says. "They're top-notch scientists, including a couple of Nobel laureates."

"Instead of arguing any more about the theoretical basis of it," he says, "we're saying 'this works, this is where we should be putting our attention.' "

"True, our theoretical grasp of all the processes in play remains imperfect, but neither can we fully explain the workings of aspirin, acupuncture or high temperature superconductivity," Kubiak says. "Unresolved questions about their mechanisms have not stopped us from enjoying their respective benefits, which are pale indeed compared to what solid state fusion offers."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coldfusion; energy; fusion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: FierceDraka

and the Chuck Norris idolatry parade rolls ever on...

Chuck Norris is the only man to ever make Dick Cheney cry!


41 posted on 03/24/2006 7:22:10 PM PST by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

>>Yes, I have that knowledge. I hold the secret... to life... itself

>Let me guess, either liquid soap, or cheese whiz?

I'm going with duct tape. It's kind of like "the Force" in Star Wars... it has a light side and a dark side, , and it binds the universe together.


42 posted on 03/24/2006 7:27:22 PM PST by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: bobbdobbs

The only "aneutronic" reaction is helium3 + deuterium. Product is a Helium4, an energetic proton, and a gamma.

Helium3 is also a decay product of tritium.


44 posted on 03/24/2006 9:02:05 PM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
Jimmy Carter? Maybe he can do for cold fusion what he did to make America less dependent on fossil fuels back in the latter half of the 1970s?

Would you believe he can do for cold fusion what he's done to make the world a more peaceful and saner place?

45 posted on 03/24/2006 10:06:07 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Neville72

Thanks for posting it, as I had not seen it before:>)


46 posted on 03/24/2006 11:58:56 PM PST by Bellflower (A Brand New Day Is Coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka

What is it with the Chuck Norris things??


47 posted on 03/25/2006 12:02:08 AM PST by Bellflower (A Brand New Day Is Coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: frannie
I wasn't talking about heat, I was talking about electricity I have an 1800 ft house and I have a 25kw whole house generator and when ever I had to use it, it was seamless, TVs, fridge, dishwasher, electric stove, lights, etc.. I didn't have to turn anything off.

To heat my house would require about 18kw alone, thats using the contractors rule of thumb 1kw per 100 sq feet.
48 posted on 03/25/2006 2:37:33 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Remember 9/11. The left have already forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

Your preaching to the chior, as I said, I ain't holding my breath.


49 posted on 03/25/2006 2:40:17 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Remember 9/11. The left have already forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tamarawilhite
the laws of physics would be different

As Einstein had said, the laws of physics have never changed and will never change, only the ways they are interpreted.
50 posted on 03/25/2006 2:43:47 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Remember 9/11. The left have already forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: frannie
Now if it produces 30 kwhs an hour that is another story.

Every generator, I've ever seen has an hourly output, a 5000w generator produces 5kw / hr, a 10,000w produces 10kw / hr, etc.

I would have to assume that the figures alleged in this article represent hourly output.
51 posted on 03/25/2006 2:49:39 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Remember 9/11. The left have already forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Neville72
Already posted
52 posted on 03/25/2006 2:50:24 AM PST by ASA Vet (If fences don't work, tear down the one around the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Some hope remaining.

And smoking is good for your health.


53 posted on 03/25/2006 2:56:32 AM PST by Bullish ( The pig headed monkeys of Islam can kiss my grits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS
I may have stated it wrong but when I worked for an small city that had it's own electric plant, that is what I was taught. There are 1000 watts in a KWH., no dash, all letters the some size.

I used 30 KWH each day last month, was charged for 905 KWH
[they write it exactly like I have]. On that number I was charged $80.35 , but my statement amt due is $108.05. So when they tell you what a kwh is, forget it. By the time they add all the additional charges you are paying, KWH divided into the total charge. So in reality I am paying $0.11929-- for each KWH--I am using.

I wonder if some know that is not just the KWH charge but the add ons also.
54 posted on 03/25/2006 1:34:52 PM PST by frannie (Be not afraid of tomorrow - God is already there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

.... iwant that secret pill that turns water into gasoline....

Not a problem..... Send me $110 and a self addressed label and I'll send two right out by priority mail.


55 posted on 03/25/2006 1:40:06 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; Swordmaker; vannrox
Ping!

56 posted on 04/23/2006 8:19:42 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson