Skip to comments.
Saddam General: Newsweek Translation of Saddam Tapes Wrong
The Reality Check ^
| March 23, 2006
| Jim Kouri, CPP
Posted on 03/24/2006 5:32:03 AM PST by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
03/24/2006 5:32:04 AM PST
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD. DING-DING-DING!
The WINNAH!
2
posted on
03/24/2006 5:33:35 AM PST
by
Old Sarge
(My vigor to fight has been renewed.)
To: Kaslin
So, how much publicity is this story going to get?
3
posted on
03/24/2006 5:35:48 AM PST
by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: nuconvert
So, how much publicity is this story going to get? Fox might mention something.
4
posted on
03/24/2006 5:40:48 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: Aquinasfan
Another Dan Rather moment?
To: Bookmaestro
6
posted on
03/24/2006 5:44:46 AM PST
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: pinz-n-needlez; onyx; ohioWfan; Texasforever; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; mrs tiggywinkle; Dog; ...
Others believe Newsweek may have a vested interest in perpetuating the story that Iraq had no WMD. Kind of makes a person go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
7
posted on
03/24/2006 5:45:03 AM PST
by
Mo1
("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
To: Kaslin
To: nuconvert
I saw a portion of this on FNC, so that is some coverage. ABC is reporting on this, too. So the other outlets are going to have to compete.
This quote: the CIAs clandestine war against the White House means the agency cannot be trusted for an honest account of whats in this material. is, IMO, very news worthy. It is provocative. Someone who wants to make sure they stay employed w/a byline should investigate this. In any event, the media has succeeded in making themselves the story, which must be uncomfortable for them, not to mention very poor journalism. Perhaps they will realize it would be good for them to change the subject about now.
Sada is selling a book. I hope he has a good PR agent. A news conference would be nice.
To: Kaslin
Trusting Newsweak could be deadly dangerous to your health.
Wasn't that long ago they were confirming the flushing of a toilet at Guantanamo.
10
posted on
03/24/2006 5:51:46 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
To: CondorFlight
I doubt anyone at the major networks speaks Arabic well enough to stage a Dan Rather moment. I think it's more like the way the Prussians manipulated the wording of an intercepted document to keep the British out of the Franco-Prussian War.
11
posted on
03/24/2006 5:51:53 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
("Brother, you can believe in stones, as long as you don't throw them at me. - W. Sultan)
To: Kaslin
Trusting Newsweak could be deadly dangerous to your health.
Wasn't that long ago they were confirming the flushing of a koran in the toilet at Guantanamo.
12
posted on
03/24/2006 5:52:07 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
To: reformedliberal
This quote: the CIAs clandestine war against the White House
That statement is...odd.
13
posted on
03/24/2006 5:53:32 AM PST
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: Kaslin
Everybody remember who was the one who wanted the cia hiring to be people of liberal quality. Yes, this always goes back to ol Clintie and his screwball commie wife. They are the ones who revamped the cia. Clinton made another mess. We now have a cia that can't catch a cat in a garbage can looking for old fish , and if someone else does, claim the cat was abused. Every thing goes back to the mess Clinton and his pro communist friends like kerry have done in the past . But of course, blame it on Bush and don't believe one of the guys who are sitting right next to Saddam , after all only Clinton and his liberals are right.
To: reformedliberal
I find it difficult to believe that some young energetic newman isn't digging into this thoroughly. The one that would come up with an honest, valid interpretation of what was what surely would make a name for himslf the envy of the profession.
15
posted on
03/24/2006 5:56:20 AM PST
by
sinbad17
To: Kaslin
Yet most of the 2 million documents have not been explored or even translated.The vast majority of government documents are totally meaningless, retained only because it's easier to store everything than to make a decision on what to discard. That applies as much to the former Iraqi government as it does to our own.
When we got these documents, we took everything we could find, even the purchase orders for pens and paper. To say these documents have not been "explored" is probably a misstatement. More likely, a screening process has taken place so that the translation effort concentrates on documents that are more likely to have important contents.
16
posted on
03/24/2006 5:56:24 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Kaslin
More SLIMY reporting by MSM but this time it is not the NY Slimes (Times), but Newsweek.
Maybe they hired fired people from the NY Slimes at Newsweek.
Maybe someone should test the toll free/800 number at Newsweek to see if they know how to answer the phone...
17
posted on
03/24/2006 6:04:35 AM PST
by
topher
(Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
To: Kaslin
Sorry, but if Sadam showed which rock the WMD are hidden under, the MSM would procame " Sadam Lies!!!"
18
posted on
03/24/2006 6:07:54 AM PST
by
newcthem
(Use Allah urinal cakes!)
To: reformedliberal
In any event, the media has succeeded in making themselves the story, which must be uncomfortable for them, not to mention very poor journalism. One thing the media always wants to be is "hip" and "cutting-edge" and I get the feeling they're sloooooowly beginning to realize that, by parroting the moonbattery of old hippies (which is the vast majority of the liberal anti-war fanatics), they are more and more being perceived as about as cutting-edge as Bob Schieffer. They're about the last bunch to realize it is the liberals they've put their stock in who have become the strident, constipated "Establishment."
19
posted on
03/24/2006 6:09:53 AM PST
by
JennysCool
(Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory.)
To: Kaslin; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; SwatTeam; ..
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson