Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Co. To Scan Nukes
AP ^ | 3-23-06 | TED BRIDIS

Posted on 03/23/2006 2:49:54 PM PST by My Favorite Headache

U.S. Hiring Chinese Co. to Scan Nukes By TED BRIDIS and JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writers 27 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - In the aftermath of the Dubai ports dispute, the Bush administration is hiring a Hong Kong conglomerate to help detect nuclear materials inside cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere.

ADVERTISEMENT

The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.

Freeport in the Bahamas is 65 miles from the U.S. coast, where cargo would be likely to be inspected again. The contract is currently being finalized.

The administration is negotiating a second no-bid contract for a Philippine company to install radiation detectors in its home country, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. At dozens of other overseas ports, foreign governments are primarily responsible for scanning cargo.

While President Bush recently reassured Congress that foreigners would not manage security at U.S. ports, the Hutchison deal in the Bahamas illustrates how the administration is relying on foreign companies at overseas ports to safeguard cargo headed to the United States.

Hutchison Whampoa is the world's largest ports operator and among the industry's most-respected companies. It was an early adopter of U.S. anti-terror measures. But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.

"Li Ka-Shing is pretty close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party," said Larry M. Wortzel, head of a U.S. government commission that studies China security and economic issues. But Wortzel said Hutchison operates independently from Beijing, and he described Li as "a very legitimate international businessman."

"One can conceive legitimate security concerns and would hope either the Homeland Security Department or the intelligence services of the United States work very hard to satisfy those concerns," Wortzel said.

Three years ago, the Bush administration effectively blocked a Hutchison subsidiary from buying part of a bankrupt U.S. telecommunications company, Global Crossing Ltd., on national security grounds.

And a U.S. military intelligence report, once marked "secret," cited Hutchison in 1999 as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other prohibited materials into the United States from the Bahamas.

Hutchison's port operations in the Bahamas and Panama "could provide a conduit for illegal shipments of technology or prohibited items from the West to the PRC (People's Republic of China), or facilitate the movement of arms and other prohibited items into the Americas," the now-declassified assessment said.

The CIA currently has no security concerns about Hutchison's port operations, and the administration believes the pending deal with the foreign company would be safe, officials said.

Supervised by Bahamian customs officials, Hutchison employees will drive the towering, truck-like radiation scanner that moves slowly over large cargo containers and scans them for radiation that might be emitted by plutonium or a radiological weapon.

Any positive reading would set off alarms monitored simultaneously by Bahamian customs inspectors at Freeport and by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials working at an anti-terrorism center 800 miles away in northern Virginia. Any alarm would prompt a closer inspection of the cargo, and there are multiple layers of security to prevent tampering, officials said.

"The equipment operates itself," said Bryan Wilkes, a spokesman for the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration, the agency negotiating the contract. "It's not going to be someone standing at the controls pressing buttons and flipping switches."

A lawmaker who helped lead the opposition to the Dubai ports deal isn't so confident. Neither are some security experts. They question whether the U.S. should pay a foreign company with ties to China to keep radioactive material out of the United States.

"Giving a no-bid contract to a foreign company to carry out the most sensitive security screening for radioactive materials at ports abroad raises many questions," said Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y.

A low-paid employee with access to the screening equipment could frustrate international security by studying how the equipment works and which materials set off its alarms, warned a retired U.S. Customs investigator who specialized in smuggling cases.

"Money buys a lot of things," Robert Sheridan said. "The fact that foreign workers would have access to how the United States screens various containers for nuclear material and how this technology scrutinizes the containers — all those things allow someone with a nefarious intention to thwart the screening."

Other experts discounted concerns. They cited Hutchison's reputation as a leading ports company and said the United States inevitably must rely for some security on large commercial operators in the global maritime industry.

"We must not allow an unwarranted fear of foreign ownership or involvement in offshore operations to impair our ability to protect against nuclear weapons being smuggled into this country," said Sen. Norm Coleman (news, bio, voting record), R-Minn., a member of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. "We must work with these foreign companies."

A former Coast Guard commander, Stephen Flynn, said foreign companies sometimes prove more trustworthy — and susceptible to U.S. influence — than governments.

"It's a very fragile system," Flynn said. Foreign companies "recognize the U.S. has the capacity and willingness to exercise a kill switch if something goes wrong."

A spokesman for Hutchison's ports subsidiary, Anthony Tam, said the company "is a strong supporter in port security initiatives."

"In the case of the Bahamas, our local personnel are working alongside with U.S. customs officials to identify and inspect U.S.-bound containers that could be carrying radioactive materials," Tam said.

However, there are no U.S. customs agents checking any cargo containers at the Hutchison port in Freeport. Under the contract, no U.S. officials would be stationed permanently in the Bahamas with the radiation scanner.

The administration is finalizing the contract amid a national debate over maritime security sparked by the furor over now-abandoned plans by Dubai-owned DP World to take over significant operations at major U.S. ports.

Hutchison operates the sprawling Freeport Container Port on Grand Bahama Island. Its subsidiary, Hutchison Port Holdings, has operations in more than 20 countries but none in the United States.

Contract documents, obtained by The Associated Press, indicate Hutchison will be paid roughly $6 million. The contract is for one year with options for three years.

The Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration is negotiating the Bahamas contract under a $121 million security program it calls the "second line of defense." Wilkes, the NNSA spokesman, said the Bahamian government dictated that the U.S. give the contract to Hutchison.

"It's their country, their port. The driver of the mobile carrier is the contractor selected by their government. We had no say or no choice," he said. "We are fortunate to have allies who are signing these agreements with us."

Some security experts said that is a weak explanation in the Bahamas, with its close reliance on the United States. The administration could insist that the Bahamas permit U.S. Customs agents to operate at the port, said Albert Santoli, an expert on national security issues in Asia and the Pacific.

"Why would they not accept that?" said Santoli, a former national security aide to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (news, bio, voting record), R-Calif. "There is an interest in the Bahamas and every other country in the region to make sure the U.S. stays safe and strong. That's how this should be negotiated."

Flynn, the former Coast Guard commander, agreed the Bahamas would readily accept such a proposal but said the U.S. is short of trained customs agents to send overseas.

Contract documents obtained by the AP show at least one other foreign company is involved in the U.S. radiation-detection program.

A separate, no-bid $4 million contract the Bush administration is negotiating would pay a Manila-based company, International Container Terminal Services Inc., to install radiation detectors at the Philippines' largest port.

The U.S. says the Manila company is not being paid to operate the radiation monitors once they are installed. But two International Container executives and a senior official at the government's Philippine Nuclear Research Institute said the company will run the detectors on behalf of the institute and the country's customs bureau. U.S. officials said they will investigate further how the Filipinos plan to use the equipment.

___

Associated Press writers Bill Foreman in Hong Kong and Jim Gomez in Manila contributed to this story.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; bahamas; bush; china; dishohesty; dishonestheadline; globalcrossing; headlineincorrect; hiring; homelandsecurity; hongkong; hutchison; hutchisonwhampoa; lies; msmliars; notthispoopagain; nuclear; nukes; scan; stuckonstupid; us; whampoa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Darkwolf377

Then do not allow any cargo from that port in until they find someone mutually acceptable.


41 posted on 03/23/2006 4:12:00 PM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

At first I thought this was a joke or something, But now this is serious. For those who dont know, The company is runned by Li Kai something I forgot, Who has serious connection in the CCP and PLA, Also the guy also controls the Panama Canal.


42 posted on 03/23/2006 4:13:39 PM PST by Petey139
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

A Iranian sub (e.g.) could transfer a nuke onto a ship after it has reached the Bahamas and inspected by the Chinese company and headed to the USA.

The only way to have real national security is to inspect the ships as they arrive (or near to the coast) in the USA by US security forces (preferably the military).

Bush should spend far less money on global and domestic welfare and far more money on national security by US citizens and US companies.


43 posted on 03/23/2006 4:14:20 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (The purpose of this forum is to fight socialism (see FR homepage), not to defend Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.

Are they out of the F@#$ING MINDS up there in Washington??

General Joe Chinaman : Harrow? Is this Wong Wei of Hutchison Whampoa in Ros Angeres? Yes?
WonWei : Yes, it's me
General Joe Chinaman : You turn off your detecter tomowwow ok? We have ze special derivery for America zhen ok?

44 posted on 03/23/2006 4:15:40 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Islam's true face: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J169127BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
This story is all part of the MSM campaign to paint Republicans as weak on security. Until they accomplish that, Democrats can't regain control.

Repeat the lines above 50 times! This is what is happening!

45 posted on 03/23/2006 4:16:34 PM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I'm convinced at least a third of the responses on any given thread are to the headline only.

Why read when you can post post post! ;^)

46 posted on 03/23/2006 4:18:10 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

A lot of the knee jerk responders never read the article, especially if they think it is time for another Bush bash.


47 posted on 03/23/2006 4:25:44 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
Hutchison Whampoa is the world's largest ports operator and among the industry's most-respected companies. It was an early adopter of U.S. anti-terror measures. But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.

But but but the Chinese already run 30% of Kalifornia's cargo terminals. Where's the outcry?

Cricket Cricket cricket cricket...

48 posted on 03/23/2006 4:31:29 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Yes they do! I bought a T-Shirt there that says it all, "Another S*itty in Paradise". Even they KNOW!

Everytime I flew out of Nassau and had to pay a "departure tax", I always felt it was money well spent!
:-)

LLS


49 posted on 03/23/2006 4:33:25 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
I guess the Republicans are just tired of running the government, because it's hard to believe that they could be this serious about shooting themselves in the feet unless it's deliberate.

Between the proposed amnesty for illegal aliens and this nonchalant attitude about port security, getting the grassroots out this year is not being made any easier.

50 posted on 03/23/2006 5:09:24 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher
What's going on with the Bush Administration?

It's been successfully protecting our nation and prosecuting a global war on terror for nearly five years now. Why do you ask?

51 posted on 03/23/2006 5:13:09 PM PST by Coop (FR= a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
"I guess the Republicans are just tired of running the government, because it's hard to believe that they could be this serious about shooting themselves in the feet unless it's deliberate."

Doesn't get any more deliberate. This goes all the way up to the National Commitee level and beyond.

52 posted on 03/23/2006 5:52:03 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

And WAYYYY up at the top of the thread - your post showing and stating the facts. Noone's going to read it though. It's headline to hysterics 'round here! :)


53 posted on 03/23/2006 6:11:50 PM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hayzo
Hey, where's Schumer? He shoulda' been on that thing IN-STANT-LEE, Fur Shur.

He's not. Bet some of his best friends are Chi-coms, eh?!

54 posted on 03/23/2006 6:23:04 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp

Well, any country but Iraq ~ they don't want us in Iraq.


55 posted on 03/23/2006 6:23:55 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

His office probably faxed the news to AP.


56 posted on 03/23/2006 6:24:23 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay
Try reading the article and not the headline.

Oh wait, your tag line proves you would rather bash Bush and bash Republicans.

57 posted on 03/23/2006 6:25:06 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.

Chairman Ka-Ching! financed the DNC and Bubba in the 1996 campaign... and now they are getting the payoff!

58 posted on 03/23/2006 6:29:44 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot; onyx; Howlin; Coop; gov_bean_ counter; Solson; 1035rep; Frank_Discussion; Dane; ...

PING for another knee jerk reaction...


59 posted on 03/23/2006 6:38:50 PM PST by Chickenhawk Warmonger (Join the chickenhawk express at www.chickenhawkexpress.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
If the US asked the Bahamas not to sign a Chinese company, do you really think they'd say no?

Is there a American Company to buy Hutchinson's terminal lease Or do they want to sell?

60 posted on 03/23/2006 6:39:19 PM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson