[Gargantua]

I wish Rove would give the WH press people more of this simplest of all truths. Dems would scoff, but America would know the difference.

[kinghorse]

great point. the diseased mind of the left used to swear up and down Lord Bush would plant the evidence if it wasn't there.

[Paradox]

Were President Bush the Machiavellian liar which Democrats would love to paint him as, we most assuredly would have found WMD’s in Iraq.

I've said this before here, and I repeat this to my liberal family and friends. IF Bush and company were as vile and evihl as they say, they would have planted WMD somewhere. It would have been easy enough to bring in a few capsules, heck, a sealed bucket of Anthrax hidden somewhere in Saddams closet would have been enough (said bucket containing enough Anthrax to kill hundreds of thousands)..

[cvq3842]

I know what you mean - if Bush had KNOWN they were not there and had been evil enough to lie, then certainly he would have deen dishonest enough to plant them, or attempt to. But if they had been found, no doubt the moonbats would have said they were planted anyway. They say Bush was behind 9/11 already, so what would stop them? The fact that neither plot could possible be kept a secret, considering the number of actors needed, makes no difference to them.

But I agree with your point.

[gondramB]

"Were President Bush the Machiavellian liar which Democrats would love to paint him as, we most assuredly would have found WMD’s in Iraq."


I've said the same thing - If I were in charge and had ordered this invasion we WOULD have found WMDs.

[RandallFlagg]

RandallFlagg: WMDs = Cheese ^

Explains my theory about it all.

[CharlesWayneCT]

But he surely would KNOW that is what they would think. So in fact there WERE WMD found, but he HID THEM, so he could say they didn't find any, to prove how honest he was. Because if he just said they found WMD, the left would argue that they were planted.

:->

[God luvs America]

I’ll repeat that: The Democrats’ biggest hurdle in proving their GOP criminal conspiracy claims is that NO biological or chemical weapons were found in Iraq.

Considering they were also making daily claims that Hussien was a threat, he had WMD and America had to take him out....that was until they thought they had a political opportunity and as most rats do, reversed course....

[LucyT]

When and what happened to Betty Currie’s brother?

[GeorgefromGeorgia]

Never thought of it that way. Slick was not straight with the American People and would have found a way to prove his claims.

However, I can't see this theory helping W.

[Niteranger68]

Using the lefts philosophy, the firemen who show up for a false alarm are liars.

[EASYACES]

Excellent commentary, Gargantua...Thanks for that!

[Chena]

Were President Bush the Machiavellian liar which Democrats would love to paint him as, we most assuredly would have found WMD’s in Iraq. We would have found Botulism in Baghdad, Ebola in Basra, Mustard in Fallujah, Anthrax in Tikrit, the stuff would have been everywhere we looked. Because so deceitful a mastermind as the great deceiver Bush would have had his Haliburton minions planting the stuff everywhere. But that didn’t happen, did it? When no WMD’s were found, the honest. integrity-bound president admitted the truth instead of scurrying to cover up the truth. How novel. What a breath of fresh air after eight years of Clinton.

What a great point, Gargantua. BTTT

[Txsleuth]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x725968

You might want to check this out...

[A.A. Cunningham]

I'm surprised that the RATS didn't claim that the WMDs & components that were found were indeed planted by GWB.

[tcrlaf]

Bump...