Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Iraqi WMD’s Proves Bush’s Integrity
Self | March 22, 2006 | Gargantua

Posted on 03/22/2006 10:15:47 AM PST by Gargantua

No Iraqi WMD’s Proves Bush’s Integrity

March 22, 2006 by Gargantua

The Democratic drumbeat, stale and tired though it may be, not only continues, but is likely to intensify as we approach the 2006 mid-term elections. Their favorite mantra?

“Bush lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction.” “Republicans can’t be trusted!”

After eight long years of Bill Clinton’s Oval Office sexcapades, Vince Foster’s suspicious death, Ron Brown’s suspicious death, Betty Currie’s brother’s suspicious death, etc., and the way that these crimes (widely acknowledged though often never proven or admitted to) turned the stomachs of the vast majority of American voters, the Republicans were granted both Houses of Congress and the White House by the people of this great country.

The Democrats know what it was that turned America against them. The blatant dishonesty and disregard for the Law or even any remotely moral consideration made the Donkey’s undeserving of the power which they had so long held—and had even taken for granted.

Their ploy this time around is to smear everything Republican that they can find with their own fecal filth. Accuse Tom DeLay of crimes and unethical behavior, accuse Bill Frist of crimes and unethical behavior (hmm… what a coincidence—both GOP House and Senate Leaders…), and keep repeating this filth via the Liberal Lapdog Media in an attempt to convince the American voter that “Republicans are just as bad as the Democrats.”

This would give the Dem’s equal footing leading up to the 2006 election cycle, if only they could convince America that their partisan accusations equal Republican guilt.

Their single-biggest hurdle in accomplishing this smear mission, however, lies not with DeLay or Frist, but with President George W. Bush. Their whole game plan relies heavily upon continually reminding America that the leader of this Republican slime brigade, George W. Bush, is the biggest, most dishonest and deceitful criminal of all.

The problem is that no Weapons of Mass Destruction were found in Iraq.

I’ll repeat that: The Democrats’ biggest hurdle in proving their GOP criminal conspiracy claims is that NO biological or chemical weapons were found in Iraq.

Were President Bush the Machiavellian liar which Democrats would love to paint him as, we most assuredly would have found WMD’s in Iraq. We would have found Botulism in Baghdad, Ebola in Basra, Mustard in Fallujah, Anthrax in Tikrit, the stuff would have been everywhere we looked. Because so deceitful a mastermind as the great deceiver Bush would have had his Haliburton minions planting the stuff everywhere. But that didn’t happen, did it? When no WMD’s were found, the honest. integrity-bound president admitted the truth instead of scurrying to cover up the truth. How novel. What a breath of fresh air after eight years of Clinton.

The simple truth is that our not finding WMD’s in Iraq is the single-most convincing proof of the absolute integrity of this President and his Administration. They should make more of a point of this as November approaches, and the Dem Slime Machine ramps up the volume.

It would have been the easiest thing to do. Just as easy as wagging a finger at the TV cameras and saying with a venomous sneer, “I did NOT have sex with THAT WOMAN.”

Deceit is easy. The Democrats are betting their political future on it. Thank God we have a president who knows the difference between expediency and integrity.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: integrity; no; proves; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: LucyT

Yes...it is on all the lists I have seen so far.


21 posted on 03/22/2006 11:15:06 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

I'm surprised that the RATS didn't claim that the WMDs & components that were found were indeed planted by GWB.


22 posted on 03/22/2006 11:22:58 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; petercooper
Details:

Theodore R. Williams - brother of Betty Currie, Clinton's private secretary. Ted was run off a highway after being hit by a truck in December l997. He got out of his wrecked car, climbed up an embankment to the highway, and then another truck hit him, killing him instantly. This was just A MONTH before Betty Currie was scheduled to testify about Billy's Oval (Ovum?) Office doings. Betty's other brother, Lee Williams, had been beaten severely and hospitalized the August before.

Source

23 posted on 03/22/2006 11:25:40 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter; petercooper
This is an interesting sentence:

Bill Clinton called Monica Lewinsky at 2:00 AM the next morning to tell her of the death and alert Monica that her name appeared on the Paula Jones witness list.

24 posted on 03/22/2006 11:36:16 AM PST by LucyT (All terrorist are muslim. ... BTW, it's 72 grapes; it never was 72 virgins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

Bump...


25 posted on 03/22/2006 11:37:35 AM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
I keep thinking, anyday, in one of these speeches, he'll say SALMAN PAK.

Why can't he say SALMAN PAK???

26 posted on 03/22/2006 11:38:38 AM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; ravingnutter

wow


27 posted on 03/22/2006 1:24:18 PM PST by petercooper (Cemeteries & the ignorant - comprising 2 of the largest Democrat voting blocs for the past 75 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
It needs to be repeated by the conservative talk show people and by Fox News until it drowns out the Dem drumbeat.

;-/

28 posted on 03/22/2006 8:55:02 PM PST by Gargantua (For those who believe in God, no explanation is needed; for those who do not, no explanation exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
It only makes sense. If Bush is as deceitful and stupid as they claim, why did we find no WMD?

;-/

29 posted on 03/22/2006 8:56:44 PM PST by Gargantua (For those who believe in God, no explanation is needed; for those who do not, no explanation exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
"I noticed that X42 never said that Bush lied. Is that because his administration turned over eight years of Intel that stated Iraq did have WMD's?

Between Algore, Madeline Albright, Janet Reno, William Cohen, and ole Bubba hisself, there are more than 30 major media reported quotes coming out of the Clinton Administration between 1997 and 2000 citing Saddam as a "grave threat" to America, primarily due to his ability to provide our enemies with WMD.

Clinton doesn't dare call Bush a liar now, because it would be an implicit admission that he was a liar then.

;-/

30 posted on 03/22/2006 9:02:57 PM PST by Gargantua (For those who believe in God, no explanation is needed; for those who do not, no explanation exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
If memory serves, a day or two before Betty Currie was to testify before the Clinton Grand Jury, her brother was struck by one car on The Beltway, and then blasted into the weeds by a van as he staggered on the side of the road from the first hit. He was pronounced dead on the scene.

There is a link here on FR to "The Clinton Body Count," which compiles an incredible number of dead people (over 100), the trail of which follows Clinton from the Arkansas Governor's Mansion right up through his eight years spent defiling our White house.

A must read.

;-/

31 posted on 03/22/2006 9:09:48 PM PST by Gargantua (For those who believe in God, no explanation is needed; for those who do not, no explanation exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EASYACES
You're most welcome. We all have to do whatever we can to help defeat the Liberal shrieking that's about to take place as the November elections approach. I'm sure that Rove's team reads FreeRepublic.

Any help we can give them with suggestions, it is our obligation to follow through on.

;-/

32 posted on 03/22/2006 9:14:03 PM PST by Gargantua (For those who believe in God, no explanation is needed; for those who do not, no explanation exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chena
I'm really suprised that the conservative talking heads (Coulter, Safire, Novak, etc.) haven't made more hay with this. Doing so by juxtaposing it with Clinton's deceptions not only points out Bush's (GOP) integrity, but it also reminds America of Clinton's (DEM) total lack thereof.

;-/

33 posted on 03/22/2006 9:17:49 PM PST by Gargantua (For those who believe in God, no explanation is needed; for those who do not, no explanation exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson