Skip to comments.Denial: A Characteristic of the Islamic Mind (Great Read!)
Posted on 03/21/2006 1:51:31 PM PST by Dark Skies
Early in 2006, I discovered a relatively new Arabic web site: www. kwtanweer.com
It originates in Kuwait, and its goal, as its name Tanweer (Enlightenment) implies, is to provide a forum for the discussion of such topics as Religion & Modernity, Civil Society, Democracy, Human Rights, and Womens place and role in society.
The subjects discussed in this forum are intriguing, as most of them would be considered avant-garde by an average Muslim. What catches my attention in my frequent perusal of the articles on this site are the readers comments. They tend to be very negative, and annoyed by any suggestion of changes in the status quo!
I would like to share with you an article with this title: Inkar (Denial). The author dealt with the topic of denial as a characteristic of the Islamic Mind. Years ago, I read books that dealt with the Arab Mind, but to my knowledge I have not noticed any book dealing with this larger topic such as the Islamic Mind. Even though, I would regard V. S. Naipauls books, An Islamic Journey, and Beyond Belief, as attempts to fathom and describe this mind.
The writer goes by the name of Ahmad al-Baghdadi; I presume that he is a Kuwaiti, but of an Iraqi background. He began with these lines:
Dr. Kamel al-Najjar, a respected author now living securely in the West, wrote an article published on the Internet dealing with the Crisis of the Islamic Mind. What he meant was the mind of Muslims and not of Islam, as a faith.
This crisis manifests itself as a serious illness besetting Muslims nowadays, namely their persistent denial of their lack of progress in the fields of scientific and human endeavors. At the same time, they keep on claiming that they are Gods best people; thus, justifying their mistakes or ignoring them in a rather shockingly naïve manner.
Everyone is aware of this lack of progress. The solution for this chronic illness requires an acknowledgement of this denial, in the same way as Dr. al-Najjar requires alcoholics, or drug addicts seeking healing, to acknowledge their condition, and confess publicly their desire for a cure. It is only after such a confession takes place that the treatment for the cure of an addict begins. On the other hand, as long as an alcoholic or a drug addict refuses to acknowledge the seriousness and reality of his condition, he is bound to continue in his substance abuse. People around him notice the results of his addiction, in spite of the fact that he persists in his denial.
Today, the Arabs failures are noticeable everywhere: in education, in economics, in politics, in culture, in administration, in technology, in manufacturing, and in human relations. If it were not for the mercy of God and the existence of the West, the Arabs would have perished, as their life expectancy would not have exceeded thirty years. [They should thank] the West that provides them with the necessities of life: such as food, medicines, technology, as well as university training for those fortunate Arabs [who manage to enter Western universities.]
And regardless of this evident lack of progress, we find Arabs taking a stand against intellectual pursuits, civil liberties, and science. They neither control the present, nor the future; all they possess is a past that ceased to exist around five hundred years ago. In other words, they glory in a culture that is no more!
Just as a car does not move without fuel, so is the condition of human civilizations; their fuel is liberty and democracy. Arabs refuse both. But they insist on claiming that they love freedom, intellectual life, and culture; while they keep on playing a broken record that proclaims the Wests indebtedness to the Islamic civilization. This is the apex of delusion!
Today, Arabs are in need of a quick medicine that would end their addiction to a dead past, and allow them to start a new life. This will not happen, as Dr. al-Najjar pointed out, unless they are ready to confess publicly their backwardness. This is the first step. The next step is the search for a cure. The prescription is ready and available from the American doctor: freedom and democracy.
That gifted Arab essayist Adonis once wrote: A society that places at the top of the pyramid of its national concerns a policy of an oppressive security, and makes it the custodian for the conduct of politics, is in the process of self-destruction. There is no such thing as security without a security that guarantees freedom and democracy. Any Arab regime that arrests a citizen on account of his thoughts or opinions is arresting not merely one citizen, but an entire country. And a government that sends a citizen to prison for his thoughts is actually incarcerating itself.
The Arabs today are living in the prison of their past, and the key to the gate of that prison is lost. Whats needed is the destruction of the gate itself, so that they may get out and experience freedom. Therefore we must destroy the shackles of that imaginary history that causes us to indulge in claiming a spurious greatness. We need to learn the lessons of history. Sometimes, however, we deny these lessons in the name of religion; other times in the name of Arab nationalism. Such denials lead to the death of any attempt for progress. So as long as Arabs cling to their concept of history with all its deceptions without attempting to separate truth from falsehood, facts from fiction, they will continue in their present state for ever.
These words of al-Baghdadi are strong medicine. They must express the exasperation of several Arab and Muslim intellectuals who are fed up with the status quo. The Internet allows them to utter such words which are regarded as extreme by the very people who need them the most.
Unfortunately the counter-denials pour into the web site. I was very disappointed by one response from a person who lives in Kuwait, the home of the Enlightenment site. I hesitate to share it with you. This is what he wrote, not only condemning the author of Denial, but all, yes all the contributors to Tanweer. Unfortunately, there are many like him who prefer to live within the prison of the past, because they are unwilling to acknowledge their addiction to a mythical view of Islamic history.
Mr. Badr (full-moon, as his Arabic name means,) shot back at the article with these shocking words:
Half of those contributing to this web site should be sent to prison, and the other half, should be confined to mental hospitals.
What a pity that a civilization that persists in denial, and prefers darkness to light!
Hmmm....and I thought it was just a river in Egypt.
Understatement of the year.
These bastards can deny anything if it suits their purposes. These are the guys who, to prove their own ownership of the harm-al-sharif (Temple Mount), deny that a Jewish Temple ever sat on top (and they do "archaeology" where they routinely throw away any artifact suggesting a Jewish past there -- great science, huh). This is, case in point, part of the long-standing problem addressed in this thread.
OK, I'm going to get labelled a bigot, but here goes: This is the first time I've ever read this in print, but I've known it ever since I went to Engineering school over 20 years ago.
I met lots of Middle Eastern students, and there were some exceptions, but IN GENERAL, they created their own reality and would argue with you on any point you disagreed until doomsday that whatever it was that you believed was dead wrong.
It wasn't a fluke, it was a mindset.
"Half of those contributing to this web site should be sent to prison, and the other half, should be confined to mental hospitals."
Well, since he contributed his reply to the site, we can only speculate as to whether Mr. Badr has been afforded the luxury of internet access from prison, or if we should disregard anything he writes as the ravings of a certified lunatic. By his own standards, it can only be one or the other.
Until they shun Islam, there is no hope.
That's why "democratizing" Muslims will not work.
Islam and western style freedom are like oil and water. They simply do not mix.
It's hard to tell where the denial ends and the religionially-approved
lying ("taqiya") begins sometimes...
Obviously he realized he was not contributing, he was detracting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.