1 posted on
03/21/2006 7:20:10 AM PST by
Clive
To: Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; mitchbert; ...
2 posted on
03/21/2006 7:20:51 AM PST by
Clive
To: Clive
For God's sake, these people have no clue whatsoever about what they are talking about, so let's sit down and discuss this.
If only our pols would be so plainly and clearly.
3 posted on
03/21/2006 7:23:22 AM PST by
JamesP81
To: Clive
There's little point in discussing it with such people. They're way, waaay beyond principled disagreement.
4 posted on
03/21/2006 7:23:37 AM PST by
Gefreiter
("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
To: Clive
"For God's sake, these people have no clue whatsoever about what they are talking about......" Says it all.
The left is both stupid and suicidal.
6 posted on
03/21/2006 7:25:10 AM PST by
A message
To: Clive
"I have contacted some of these groups. They're sort of reluctant to discuss the issues."
Gosh I can't imagine why.
7 posted on
03/21/2006 7:29:09 AM PST by
Valin
(Purple Fingers Rule!)
To: Clive
Samad suggested it was hypocritical of opponents to Canada's involvement in Afghanistan to protest now when they remained silent in the 1990s while the Taliban oppressed women and denied children a modern education. "Where were you when the women of Afghanistan were imprisoned?" he asked. "Where were you when the children of Afghanistan were denied schooling? Where were these demonstrations for human rights and dignity and honour?"
These questions need to be asked loudly and publicly every time one of these left wing wacko groups protests.
9 posted on
03/21/2006 7:34:21 AM PST by
Reagan is King
(Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it)
To: Clive
Lefties have a political agenda. Destroy Bush. Destroy Harper, etc. That's the only way their protests make any sense because they contradict themselves all the time. These same people claim to believe in tolerance and women's rights, both of which were trampled on by the Taliban. But tolerance, multiculuralism, diversity, women's rights, civil rights, etc. only have meaning when they advance a political agenda, not the people in question who are exploited as a means to a political end.
13 posted on
03/21/2006 8:39:45 AM PST by
Nextrush
(The Chris Matthews Band: "I get high..I get high...I get high..McCain.")
To: Clive
--I have contacted some of these groups. They're sort of reluctant to discuss the issues
No sh!t.
14 posted on
03/21/2006 8:52:10 AM PST by
bkepley
To: Clive
16 posted on
03/21/2006 12:46:12 PM PST by
Sam Gamgee
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
To: Clive
17 posted on
03/21/2006 2:02:22 PM PST by
kanawa
(Freaking panty wetting, weakspined bliss-ninny socialist punks)
To: Clive
"I have contacted some of these groups. They're sort of reluctant to discuss the issues." Typical liberal punks. Big words with no substance.
18 posted on
03/21/2006 2:05:43 PM PST by
airborne
(Satan's greatest trick was convincing people he doesn't exist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson