Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Understanding Jihadist Strategy
Jewish Press ^ | 3-20-06 | Robert J. Avrech

Posted on 03/20/2006 4:11:06 PM PST by SJackson

One could easily argue that Al Qaeda and the worldwide jihad pansurgency have their roots in the Algerian War. Alistair Hornes’s magnificent book Savage War of Peace, Algeria 1954-1962 is a must read for a thorough understanding of what’s going on in Iraq and the Muslim world today.

The Algerian insurgents were, at the beginning, a mix of westernized intellectuals and Muslim fundamentalists, but soon enough the jihadists took over. Simply put, they were more brutal, willing to commit the kind of atrocities that would put them in the vanguard.

It is vital to understand that what’s going on in Iraq today is part of an old and reliable guerilla playbook. If you don’t understand the military and political stages, then you are fated to be crushed beneath the wheels of the jihadists. There is nothing improvised about the daily homicide bombings. It is a carefully thought-out tactic – part of a grand strategy that stabs at the soft heart of the Western middle class.

And the Battle of Algiers is where the Muslim jihadists first perfected it.

The strategy for modern terrorism was well defined by the Brazilian guerrilla leader, Carlos Marighela, before he was hunted down and killed:

"It is necessary to turn political crisis into armed conflict by performing violent actions that will force those in power to transform the political situation of the country into a military situation. That will alienate the masses, who, from then on, will revolt against the army and the police and blame them for this state of things."

Marighela’s philosophy is simple: using terrorism will inevitably provoke the forces of law and order to strike back with overwhelming force and repression, thereby alienating the hithero uncommitted native population. The idea is to polarize the situation into two extreme camps and make impossible any dialogue of compromise by eradicating the "soft center."

Wrote Marighela: "The government can only intensify its repression thus making the life of its citizens harder than ever.… The population will refuse to collaborate with the authorities, so that the latter will find the only solution to their problems lies in having recourse to the actual physical liquidation of their opponents. The political situation of the country will become a military situation…."

It was along this line of thought that the Algerians started their war against civilians – without mercy, without quarter.

The opening attack came in a small hot place called Philippeville. Philippeville was a small mining center of about 130 Europeans and about 2,000 Muslims, who for years had coexisted amicably. Apparently, labor relations were extremely good with a rare degree of equality between Muslim and European.

It appears that the Muslim community was aware of what was about to happen on August 20, 1955. A number of Muslim families even left town. But no one warned the Europeans.

Shortly before noon, four groups of fifteen to twenty Muslim men attacked the village, taking it completely by surprise. They were led by Muslim mineworkers who knew each house and their neighbors. Intimately. Telegraph lines were cut, the emergency radio transmitter was found to be "out of order," and the village constable who was equipped with warning rockets had "disappeared."

The Muslim attackers went from house to house, mercilessly slaughtering all the European occupants: men, women, children, infants, all the time egged on by Muslim women with their eerie ululations. From the mosque came exhortations to slit the throats of women and nurses in the cause of jihad.

It was not until two o’clock in the afternoon that a French para unit managed to reach the town. An appalling sight greeted them. In houses literally washed with blood, European mothers were discovered with their throats slit and their bellies slashed open by billhooks. Children suffered the same fate, and infants in arms had had their brains dashed against the wall. A mother was disemboweled, her five-day-old baby slashed to death and replaced in her open womb.

Four entire families had been wiped out to the last member; only six who had barricaded themselves in a house in the center of the village and had held out with sporting rifles and revolvers survived.

Men returning from the mines had been ambushed in their cars and hacked to pieces. Altogether thirty-seven Europeans had died, including ten children under fifteen, and another thirteen had been left for dead.

The reaction of the French army was immediate. Out in the streets they found

"...bodies literally strewed the town. The Arab children, wild with enthusiasm – to them it was a great holiday – rushed about yelling among the grown-ups. They finished off the dying. In one alley we found two of them kicking in an old woman’s head. We had to kill them on the spot: they were crazed.…"

The reprisals were severe. The Algerians claim that as many as 12,000 were killed by the French. The French say 1,273. We will never know the truth. But the Philippville Massacre had its intended impact. The polarizing effect Marighela spoke of immediately occurred. The Battle of Algiers went on for eight bloody years, and the brutality on both sides was unspeakable – for there was a burning river of blood between the French and the Algerians after Philippville.

In Iraq right now, the terrorists are working from the exact same playbook. They are murdering innocent civilians indiscriminately. The hope is that the Americans will clamp down with even greater ferocity and the population will turn against the liberators. For make no mistake about it – the average Iraqi is relieved that Saddam and his gang of torturers, rapists and killers are gone.

So far, the Americans are playing it smart. They are reacting calmly and professionally. The terrorists are getting desperate, thus the recent attack on the Golden Mosque in an attempt to spark a civil war.

But on the home front the mainstream media have not a clue as to the grand strategy the terrorists are using. They see car bombs, body parts, and chaos and assume that all is lost. They do not understand warfare; worse, they do not understand evil.

In fact they enable evil with their foolish dispatches.

But there are some of us who understand jihad, some of us who understand evil and can comprehend that this is a hundred-year war that will be fought on a hundred far shores. We must be patient and, yes, steadfast. It takes time and blood to defeat evil, but it can and must be done or we will be thrown back to the seventh century and its barbarian masters.

Robert J. Avrech, whose Aug. 20, 2005 Jewish Press front-page essay "Help! I’m A Hollywood Republican!" was cited, carried and linked to by numerous websites and blogs, is an Emmy Award-winning Hollywood screenwriter and producer. Among his numerous credits are "A Stranger Among Us" and "The Devil’s Arithmetic."

His novel, "The Hebrew Kid and the Apache Maiden," out in paperback, has just received The Association of Jewish Libraries Award for Notable Children’s Book of Jewish Content. Robert’s website, Seraphic Secret (seraphicpress.com), recently placed first in the Best Personal Blog category of the Jerusalem Post-sponsored Jewish & Israeli Blog Awards.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedastrategy; atrocities; israel; nuketheeffinjihad; taqiya; wot

1 posted on 03/20/2006 4:11:07 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking the keyword or topic Israel.

---------------------------

2 posted on 03/20/2006 4:13:58 PM PST by SJackson (There is but one language which can be held to these people, and this is terror, William Eaton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A Jovial Cad; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; adam_az; af_vet_rr; agrace; ahayes; ...
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel/Russian Jewry ping list.

Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.

3 posted on 03/20/2006 4:19:04 PM PST by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 97-103)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; All
Old post:

Terror in Algeria- a little history, please....
various websites | 12-15-01 | backhoe

4 posted on 03/20/2006 4:26:13 PM PST by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Did the author consider the Soviets to be in any way involved in Algeria? This civilian atrocity tactic is right out of their playbook originating with the Partisan fighting in WWII.
5 posted on 03/20/2006 4:27:48 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Destroy the enemy before they destroy us.


6 posted on 03/20/2006 4:28:40 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY ((((Live Free or Die - Death to IslamiNazism))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The opening attack came in a small hot place called Philippeville. Philippeville was a small mining center of about 130 Europeans and about 2,000 Muslims, who for years had coexisted amicably. Apparently, labor relations were extremely good with a rare degree of equality between Muslim and European.

2,000 Moderate Muslims to be sure.
As I have said before, you never know when the moderates are going to get religion.

They got it that day. - tom

7 posted on 03/20/2006 4:28:56 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Fred Nerks; ma bell; joan


The Balkans early 90's comes to mind as well as Kosovo long story stort.


8 posted on 03/20/2006 4:31:17 PM PST by tgambill (I would like to comment.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

"Alistair Hornes’s magnificent book Savage War of Peace"

I'll see your savage war and raise you a couple:
"The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power"
by Max Boot

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/046500721X/qid=1142901226/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-3820179-8299331?s=books&v=glance&n=283155

This book basically says the USA has either been "rattling swords" or
weilding them somewhere on the planet since 1805.
So much for all our peace activists talking about our country ever
totally being "at peace".


9 posted on 03/20/2006 4:36:38 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Right On target.


It should be added that during the Algerian War the French academics and intellectuals took the side of the terrorists.
also, the left was not just satisfied with surrender to the Islamic radicals they then opened the door for massive immigration of Islamic radicals to France.
10 posted on 03/20/2006 4:37:43 PM PST by Jonah Johansen ("Coming soon to a neighborhood near you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom

I'm sure those Islamics were simply irritated that they couldn't easily
immigrate to France and live there in a perpetually p-ssed-off mood.
(end sarcasm)


11 posted on 03/20/2006 4:41:24 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tgambill

Centrifugal Tendencies In The Algerian Civil War:

snip

Islamists in Algeria vociferously diverged, in particular, over the permissibility of targeting civilians. On one side of the debate, Islamists argued that Islam prohibits attacks against civilians. Innocent human life is spared except in the most extreme circumstances, and the mujahidin (holy warriors) must do all that is possible to avoid civilian casualties. Legitimate targets include only those directly engaged in the conflict, such as the government, police, and military. The Algerianists and a number of Salafis who believe in jihad, but not at any cost, supported this understanding.

In contrast, the more radical Salafis, as represented by the Armed Islamic Group (GIA), drew a stark distinction between supporters and opponents of the jihad. [12] Opponents included noncombatants who were deemed obstacles to the struggle, such as the press, academics, teachers, secularists, and various civil society leaders. Beginning in the mid-1990s, certain GIA factions expanded this category to include ordinary Algerians, who through their everyday activities were seen as providing tacit approval for the regime. Thus school children attending government schools, journalists providing negative coverage of Islamist actions, the leaders of civil society organizations that sponsored nonIslamist causes, and anyone not actively supporting the jihad were judged apostates and legitimate targets of violence. Even other armed Islamist groups that did not conform to this radical doctrine of engagement were not immune from attacks.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2501/is_3_23/ai_78804226

The mohammadans can always find a way to explain why they must kill people. In The Balkans they had help...from the US - and that's just soooo embarrassing some would prefer to pretend it didn't happen, it's easier to demonize Milosevic.


12 posted on 03/20/2006 5:33:56 PM PST by Fred Nerks (Read the bio THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free! Click Fred Nerks for link to my Page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I think that the last paragraph was right on target. We won't see the end of this conflict, not in our lifetimes.

And when the enemy again brings their evil to bear on Americans here in the homeland, perhaps even the dodos that inhabit our nation's pressrooms might get the message.

13 posted on 03/20/2006 5:35:24 PM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

why do people always hope that the dodos will finally wake up and see the danger...they will not


14 posted on 03/20/2006 5:49:02 PM PST by georgia2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"...the Americans are playing it smart. They are reacting calmly and professionally. The terrorists are getting desperate..."

"But...the mainstream media have not a clue as to the grand strategy the terrorists are using. They see car bombs, body parts, and chaos and assume that all is lost. They do not understand warfare; worse, they do not understand evil.

"In fact they enable evil with their foolish dispatches."

15 posted on 03/20/2006 5:51:31 PM PST by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

"One could easily argue that Al Qaeda and the worldwide jihad pansurgency have their roots in the Algerian War."

I was waiting for someone to come up with this angle. The reason being: the Algerian war apparently occurred before the Russians (Soviets) jumped in and took over the terrorist racket for themselves.

The story of terrorism in the 20th century is primarily a Soviet story. So of course, someone comes up with the theory saying it all stemmed from Algeria---the major pre-Soviet terror event.

I believe Al Qaeda works closely with the Russians, just like every other post-Algerian terrorist group, both in the 20th and the 21st centuries!


16 posted on 03/20/2006 6:16:09 PM PST by strategofr (Hillary stole 1000+ secret FBI files on DC movers & shakers, Hillary's Secret War, Poe, p. xiv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: georgia2006

You're probably right. I tend to be a optimist.


17 posted on 03/20/2006 6:53:31 PM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: SJackson

The Battle of Algiers was a well known recruiting tool for the Left during the sixties. Its dream was to repeat it across the world. Those leftists dominated the Clinton administration and left us with an appaling situation.

Those leftists also dominate the Treason Media which cannot allow the word of Victory to come from Iraq. The desparate attempt to paint this amazing achievement as Defeat has overreached all bounds. Imagine a three yr effort with loses of about two deaths a day has become a Lost Cause to the majority of dumbassed Americans if the polls are to be believed.


19 posted on 03/20/2006 8:34:39 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It appears that the Muslim community was aware of what was about to happen on August 20, 1955. A number of Muslim families even left town. But no one warned the Europeans.

A moderate Muslim is someone who is not inclined to kill non-Muslims himself, yet is also not about to oppose fellow Muslims who DO want to kill them.

A Muslim who fights against fellow Muslims on the side of the infidels, is an apostate by definition

20 posted on 03/21/2006 6:04:56 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson