Skip to comments.
This Essay Breaks the Law
NYT ^
| Published: March 19, 2006
| By MICHAEL CRICHTON
Posted on 03/20/2006 9:56:09 AM PST by Grig
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Caesar Soze
The speed of light varies depending on what medium it's moving through. I believe the writer left off three important words that are usually used, "in a vacuum."
To: E. Pluribus Unum
As I said, the original intent of intellectual property law was to encourage innovation, now it actually discourages it. Unless you have hard data to support that conclusion, it is a subjective one at best. Just because someone would have to pay for the use of intellectual property (which you put in quotes) doesn't mean that net innovation is discouraged. Rewarding the producer has a way of motivating the demonstrably productive.
42
posted on
03/20/2006 10:53:01 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Barah, yetzirah, assiyah)
To: Young Werther
I just (R)egistered the word "pattented" and intend to maintain it's (C)opyright for the next 18 years!!! Copyright now lasts far beyond your death, or most likely an infinite term since the government keeps retroactively extending it.
Wishing for the old days, 28 years plus a 28-year renewal. That's more in line with the constitutional intent.
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
In purely geometric terms, it's no more correct to say the Earth orbits the Sun than to say the Sun circles around the Earth. In terms of Newtonian mechanics, neither statement is correct: both bodies orbit their common center of mass.
The common center of mass between the earth and the sun is located within the sun, so it is more correct to say the earth orbits the sun.
44
posted on
03/20/2006 10:55:08 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Grig
I just pattented the word 'bump'. I'm going to be soooo rich! :-) You may want to patent the word "pattented" while you're at it.
45
posted on
03/20/2006 10:55:34 AM PST
by
Mogollon
To: Caesar Soze
The speed of light is still a constant, because it can be applied in a formula to determine refractive index. Now, velocity...
46
posted on
03/20/2006 11:00:47 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Grig; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones; Pyro7480; ...
"Elevated homocysteine is linked to B-12 deficiency, so doctors should test homocysteine levels to see whether the patient needs vitamins."
ACTUALLY, I can't make that last statement. A corporation has patented that fact, and demands a royalty for its use. Anyone who makes the fact public and encourages doctors to test for the condition and treat it can be sued for royalty fees. Any doctor who reads a patient's test results and even thinks of vitamin deficiency infringes the patent. A federal circuit court held that mere thinking violates the patent. Free market privatization on the march. Soon everything will be owned by some private entity including the air we breath.
See my tagline.
47
posted on
03/20/2006 11:05:12 AM PST
by
A. Pole
(Ivan Boesky: "What good is the moon, if you can't buy or sell it?")
To: Carry_Okie
48
posted on
03/20/2006 11:07:32 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: Grig
USSC will throw this patent out.
To: antiRepublicrat
Somebody already copyrighted silence. I'm not kidding. Four minutes, 33 seconds of silence to be precise. I'm safe then. I'm a high school math teacher and that tune has never been sung in my class. At least, not for that duration.
50
posted on
03/20/2006 11:08:07 AM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: Grig
I got you beat. Last week, I patented the letter "E." This thread alone has netted me enough to finish paying off my bass boat.
51
posted on
03/20/2006 11:16:35 AM PST
by
IronJack
To: ItsForTheChildren
The earth revolves around the sun and rotates on its axis. So if my revolver cylinder rotates, what revolves and what does it revolve around? Should I put a tether on it? :-)
To: Larry Lucido
"So if my revolver cylinder rotates..."
It is not a cylinder, it is a flat disk that rotates by means of a turntable device and plays music from vibrations the needle picks up following the set grooves in the disk.
Revolver was an okay album.
53
posted on
03/20/2006 11:29:34 AM PST
by
Deguello
(Wake me up early, be good to my dogs and teach my children to play.)
To: Deguello
"Revolver was an okay album."
Also doubles as a Frisbee(TM) which neither rotates nor revolves but is sometimes described as a "gyroscopically stabilized disk," so I guess it gyrates, but not like this one girl I knew but I can't get into that right now.
To: Grig
I copyrighted and petented the phriase "It's Bush's Fault" I'll get rich off of all the liberals.
55
posted on
03/20/2006 11:39:24 AM PST
by
feedback doctor
(Socialism, the opiate of liberals)
To: Grig
Correcting spelling errors I copyrighted and patented the phrase "It's Bush's Fault" I'll get rich off of all the liberals.
56
posted on
03/20/2006 11:39:55 AM PST
by
feedback doctor
(Socialism, the opiate of liberals)
To: Grig
The concept of patents was doomed the moment software patents were legitimized.
Now, any thought that occurs to you can be patented if you can afford it. It's absolutely insane and unsustainable.
57
posted on
03/20/2006 11:42:07 AM PST
by
TChris
("Wake up, America. This is serious." - Ben Stein)
To: Grig
Facts can't be copyrighted--why could a patent be issued on a "fact'?
58
posted on
03/20/2006 11:59:20 AM PST
by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: antiRepublicrat
Maybe this is just semantics, but the speed of light is constant in ANY medium. The speed of light WILL vary as it leaves one medium and enters another, but within any medium, the speed of light is constant.
To: antiRepublicrat
But his estate sued another composer who did his own minute of silence, not simply playing a recording of the previous 'work.' About the only connection was a joking reference to the original composer in the credit.
The case never went to trial - Mike Batt settled out of court. However, I fully believe that Batt could have won in court, especially if the lawyer had framed the case properly. Where Batt screwed up was in actually having made a direct attribution to Cage on his album in the first place, and that's probably the only thing that motivated them to settle.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson