Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big KR shareholder barely breaks even in sale (Dinosaur Media Extinction Alert)
Miami Herald ^ | March 19, 2006 | CHRIS O'BRIEN AND PETE CAREY

Posted on 03/20/2006 3:56:13 AM PST by abb

Bruce Sherman, the Knight Ridder shareholder who launched the crusade to force a sale of Knight Ridder, paid an average of $65 a share for his stock; the sales price was $67.25.

SAN JOSE, Calif. - Nearly five months after Knight Ridder's largest shareholder launched a crusade to force a sale of the San Jose company, Bruce Sherman's efforts appear to have earned him mixed results.

On Monday, Sherman apparently got his wish when McClatchy announced it would buy Knight Ridder, the nation's second-largest newspaper company.

But the price -- $67.25 a share in the $4.5 billion deal -- is well below historic premiums paid for newspapers. And it means that for all his trouble, Sherman -- who paid an average of $65 a share for his stock -- will barely break even on his Knight Ridder investment.

Even that modest victory is not assured because Sherman and other shareholders will be paid with a mix of cash and McClatchy stock, which has fallen 3.8 percent since the deal was announced. In addition, Sherman has seen his sizable McClatchy holdings lose $55.6 million in value since the beginning of the year when the company emerged as a bidder for Knight Ridder.

Going forward, Sherman will become the largest shareholder in the new and substantially bigger McClatchy, with 20 percent of the publicly traded stock. But analysts project McClatchy's stock will be stuck in neutral for some time as it focuses on paying down the sizable debt it used to finance the Knight Ridder deal.

(Excerpt) Read more at miami.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kri; mcclatchy; msm; newspapers
Nobody ever went broke taking a profit....
1 posted on 03/20/2006 3:56:18 AM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb
Nobody ever went broke taking a profit....

True, but in this case, the profit's only a profit if McClatchy stock stays afloat long enough for him to sell it.

It's possible that a drowning man has latched on to an anchor.

2 posted on 03/20/2006 3:59:51 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

LOL. Could be good news all around. This definitely cools any ardor for future newspaper buyouts/bailouts. As evidenced by the stocks of all newspapers going down all last week, even as the dow went up...


3 posted on 03/20/2006 4:03:18 AM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb
I have not followed this story but, buried far down in the copy:

Henry Berghoef, research director at Harris Associates and one of the dissident shareholders that pushed for the sale of Knight Ridder, defended the result. He noted that the price is well above the $52.76 that the stock traded at before the revolt.

4 posted on 03/20/2006 4:08:30 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

If that rag they call the Philadelphia Inquirer goes bust, I will fly to Philly just to laugh at the dems that I know there.


5 posted on 03/20/2006 4:18:02 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Anybody know what the political leanings of the new owner are?


6 posted on 03/20/2006 6:05:12 AM PST by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén

.....Anybody know what the political leanings of the new owner are?.....

Neutral of course. All newspaper owners are unbiased and apolitical.



7 posted on 03/20/2006 6:08:21 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén

McClatchy's "flagship paper" (whatever that is) is the Sacramento Bee. I don't read that paper much, but I suspect it's just another liberal rag....


8 posted on 03/20/2006 6:11:02 AM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb

If it's the Sacramento Bee we can expect more of the same.


9 posted on 03/20/2006 6:12:35 AM PST by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abb

I love it when the Old Media require two reporters to write one story and then complain about layoffs.


10 posted on 03/20/2006 6:15:41 AM PST by Crawdad (So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad

check this out. More good news..

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1599537/posts


11 posted on 03/20/2006 6:19:11 AM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson