Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India-U.S. deal disturbing, says Musharraf (Clueless Dictator)
The Hindu ^

Posted on 03/19/2006 11:33:57 AM PST by indianrightwinger

India-U.S. deal disturbing, says Musharraf

B. Muralidhar Reddy

It will upset the balance of power

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf has said the civilian nuclear cooperation pact between the United States and India will upset the `balance of power' in the region.

Addressing jawans at Bhawalpur in the Punjab province on Friday, Gen. Musharraf termed the deal "disturbing to Pakistan." He maintained that Pakistan's nuclear arsenals were in safe hands and there was no need to worry about them.

Ever since New Delhi and Washington forged the nuclear deal in July last, Pakistan has been seeking a similar package on the ground that it is also a nuclear power like India and needs to boost its energy potential to take care of future needs.

Orchestrated campaign

It is for the first time that Pakistan has raised questions on the possible `ill-effects' of the India-U.S. deal on the region.

In an orchestrated campaign on Friday, Gen. Musharraf, Foreign Minister Khurshid Mehmood Kasuri and the Foreign Office raised questions on the deal. Obviously the move is intended to influence the U.S. Congress, whose approval of the deal the Bush Administration has sought.

The Financial Times quoted the Foreign Minister as saying the U.S. decision to give nuclear technology to India would encourage other nations to follow suit.

"The whole Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty will unravel. It is only a matter of time before other countries will act in the same way," Mr. Kasuri told the daily in an interview.

"Nuclear weapons are the currency of power and many countries would like to use it. Once this goes through, the NPT will be finished. It is not just Iran and North Korea. Brazil, Argentina and Pakistan will think differently," he said.

Edge for armed forces

On Saturday Gen. Musharraf said the Government was taking all possible measures to provide state-of-the-art weapons and equipment to the armed forces to maintain a qualitative edge.

Addressing Army officers at the Bhawalpur Garrison, he lauded the role of the armed forces, particularly the Army, for combating terrorism and the relief work they were carrying out in earthquake-hit areas.

He said the armed forces had proved their mettle working as peacekeepers under the U.N. banner.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; india; indous; npt; nuclear; pakistan; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2006 11:34:02 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
Addressing jawans at Bhawalpur in the Punjab province on Friday

And they took his gift back home with them.
2 posted on 03/19/2006 11:38:10 AM PST by AmishDude (Amishdude, servant of the dark lord Xenu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

heheheh...

BTW, "Jawans" in hindi/urdu means soldiers....


3 posted on 03/19/2006 11:42:44 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
"Nuclear weapons are the currency of power and many countries would like to use it. Once this goes through, the NPT will be finished. It is not just Iran and North Korea. Brazil, Argentina and Pakistan will think differently," he said.

Is this incorrect?

4 posted on 03/19/2006 11:44:51 AM PST by Decepticon (The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Decepticon

Of course, it is incorrect. Linking broader proliferation with the Indo-US deal is the silliest thing I heard as an argument.

NPT did not stop Iran and North Korea. Rouge nations need to be dealt with, but not by punishing countries like India.


5 posted on 03/19/2006 11:48:03 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

"India-U.S. deal disturbing, says Musharraf"

Yeah? And what about China-Pak nuclear deal? Chasma and Kahuta nuclear reactors?


6 posted on 03/19/2006 11:49:16 AM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

Now, now, now, President Bush said just a week or two ago that Musharraf was a force for freedom in the Arab world. Of course, the fact that Pakistan is neither free or Arab changes nothing.


7 posted on 03/19/2006 11:51:13 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

The chicoms are helping pakistan with nuke upgrades. In return, they'll get to build Gwandar Port near the straits of hormuz, hoping to push the US Navy out of the area and control oil flow.


8 posted on 03/19/2006 11:51:13 AM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
Rouge nations need to be dealt with,....

I see. Well, get on it. Start with Pakistan and then work your way over to Iran, we got your left flank....

9 posted on 03/19/2006 11:58:31 AM PST by Decepticon (The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Decepticon
"Is this incorrect?"

Absolutely incorrect.
Iran, North Korea, Brazil and Argentina are NPT signatories. India wasn't. As a result India had to pay the price. India was shunned by the international community from gaining access to civilian nuclear technology/fuel supply. So India had to indigenously develop civilian nuclear technology and had to use its own fuel reserve.

OTOH the NPT signatory countries have full access to international technology as well as fuel as long as they keep it under safeguard. Iran and NK for a long time enjoyed full access to international civilian nuclear technology/fuel (from Russia, Europe and/or China). Now that Iran and NK have the technology, they want to backtrack from the NPT treaty, want the IAEA officials to pack up and leave, use the technology and fuel to make the bomb and would want to use the Indo-US nuclear deal as an alibi for their evil intentions. How good is that?

The only buyers for the above argument are the loud mouthed Liberal hawks in Washington.
10 posted on 03/19/2006 12:13:40 PM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Decepticon; Gengis Khan

Back in '71, India was about to over-run Pakistan, and then the US forced India to back off.


11 posted on 03/19/2006 12:13:52 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

Ok Tashamud...

Musharaff has more than the usual number of problems. The military in Pakistan has always claimed its need for advanced technology and efficiency to counteract India's population advantage as its reason for both loyalty and freedom from the restrictions of Islam, compared to the opposition approach of the Hanabi/Wahabi school of Islamic fundamentalism.

Pakistan's intelligence service created the Taliban as a special operation to counter the Pakistan military "conventional approach".

To the extent that Pakistan moves toward a democratic secular government, it mimics India, their hated enemy. The Pakistan military is between Islamic Fundamentalism and Secular Democracy, offering secular efficiency in service to the goals of Islamic fundamentalism.

Sucks to be him just now. He knows it. I am not sure he knows an answer just yet. Better if India and Pakistan were a single Secular Country, but that mistake was made a while ago.


12 posted on 03/19/2006 2:01:38 PM PST by Donald Meaker (You don't drive a car looking through the rear view mirror, but you do practice politics that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Donald Meaker
You have know idea what you are talking about. Your constructs on Pakistan and Musharraf are far from reality. At best its parroting the same baloney that is (by design)dished out by the US media to make a hero/ally out of Musharraf and very much reflective of the American public's mindset to blindly accept as reality (to the point of actually desperately wanting to believe their own drivel) and regurgitate the same inanity as if indoctrinated by their own Government and media outreach/overkill.

The least we Indians can do to hedge this kind of media induced nonsensical blather put forth as argument/reasoning is to say that we know our enemies better than you.
13 posted on 03/19/2006 2:48:39 PM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Donald Meaker
Better if India and Pakistan were a single Secular Country, but that mistake was made a while ago.

please, it isnt a mistake. it was the right thing to do. do you see how 15% of muslims are creating havoc in India. imagine that with abt 50% of them, had there been no puke-stan! thank Gandhiji for this good deed of dividing the country and getting rid of atleast some of the scum which still lives in 7th century AD!

so, no thank you, we dont need the scum that puke-sthan is filled with!

14 posted on 03/19/2006 3:54:15 PM PST by An_Indian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: An_Indian

15% of muslims = 15% of indian population is muslims


15 posted on 03/19/2006 3:55:34 PM PST by An_Indian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: An_Indian

I understand that you are glad to be shut of them. I was thinking of the manifold logistics problems associated with the partition.

I was rather hoping that the holiness of the Hindu would rub off on them. East Pakistan also has a stronger Sufi tradition, and perhaps would also help dilute the Hanabi poison.

You are right, I would not wish a friend of mine to take even a drop of poison. Thanks for reminding me.


16 posted on 03/19/2006 4:21:36 PM PST by Donald Meaker (You don't drive a car looking through the rear view mirror, but you do practice politics that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: An_Indian
Speaking as a non-Indian, it was...

please, it isn't a mistake.

Partition was a mistake for the world and India. (Pakistani nukes really bother me for some reason)

Tis India's business, of course.

17 posted on 03/19/2006 5:09:09 PM PST by ARridgerunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

Tell the dictator of Pakistan that Russia is willing and able to sell weapons to it, and that Pakistan can go jump off a cliff for backstabbing us.


18 posted on 03/19/2006 6:17:10 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An_Indian

actually, you should have kicked that 15% out as well.


19 posted on 03/20/2006 3:01:42 AM PST by Cronos (Remember 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia! Ultra-Catholic: Sola Scriptura leads to solo scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Russia won't sell weapons to Pakiland because then they'll lose a far bigger customer -- India.


20 posted on 03/20/2006 3:02:45 AM PST by Cronos (Remember 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia! Ultra-Catholic: Sola Scriptura leads to solo scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson