Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newspapers in an Economic Storm
Washington Post ^ | March 19, 2006 | By Deborah Howell

Posted on 03/18/2006 11:02:48 PM PST by MRMEAN

Recent events in the newspaper business make it clear that newsrooms cannot escape market forces.

Stockholders forced the sale of Knight Ridder Inc., the nation's second-largest newspaper chain, with 32 papers. McClatchy Co. announced Monday it would buy Knight Ridder, but said it would sell 12 of the 32 newspapers -- the ones not making enough money and not in growth markets.

And Post editors announced March 10 that the newsroom will cut 80 of 870 newsroom positions. The New York Times, located in the world's financial center, announced on Tuesday that it will stop publishing daily stock listings.

Advertising revenue has fallen at most newspapers because of mergers of major retailers, lagging auto sales, the bankruptcies of major advertisers and a shift of classified ads to free Web sites such as Craigslist. Declining circulation and the defection of young readers to the Internet mean that newspapers can't raise their advertising rates year after year.

Newspapers are part of the civic glue that holds communities together. The turnover in newspaper ownership has been staggering to cities that wake up to find their newspaper sold and to employees who thought their jobs were safe. The Post, like most big-city dailies, has lost circulation -- a nearly 7 percent drop since 2003 -- and advertising revenue has been flat while expenses have risen, so The Post is trimming its budget sails. Newspaper journalism is labor-intensive and expensive; the two big costs are people and paper.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: deborahhowell; msm; newspapers; oldmedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: PSYCHO-FREEP

I feel for your cockateil.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


41 posted on 03/19/2006 9:44:48 AM PST by bray (Proud Bushbot for 6 years going on 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Hello,

This morning, I decided that I will call them the "DMW". That stands for "Dead Media Walking".

Glad to be here, MOgirl
42 posted on 03/19/2006 9:49:32 AM PST by MOgirl (Hillary. She's a totalitarian freak. And you know what I'm talkin' about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

If those that currently run newspapers would have rented Clark Gable's TEACHER'S PET rather then go to Journalism School, they would learn just what a newspaper is.

I will give them a hint, it is not to tie the community together.


43 posted on 03/19/2006 9:57:46 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Newspapers are part of the civic glue that holds communities together.

Humbug. Newspapers have traditionally been run by rank partisans and you could find a paper that reflected your polticial leanings no matter what they were. Only in the post war era, when the left achieved a preponderance of the outlets, did newspapers posture as nonpartisan seekers of objective truth. The fact of course is that they were just as partisan as ever.

44 posted on 03/19/2006 10:02:39 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Cleveland used to have three major newspapers; the morning Plain Dealer, the noon-ish Cleveland News, and the afternoon Cleveland Press. Many years ago the Press bought the News, and the PD finally absorbed the Press, and they both happened with some publicity, but nary a ripple, much less "staggering" of the city's operation and functioning. In each case it was all over in a few days and no one even remembered or cared six months later.
45 posted on 03/19/2006 10:09:16 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Delightful. Where did that come from?
46 posted on 03/19/2006 10:12:08 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN; Mo1; Molly Pitcher
The very last line:

If Post journalists write every story, take every photo, compose every headline and design every page with readers in mind, and the newspaper is printed well and delivered on time, The Post will be fine.

(melodically)
If you wish upon a star, makes no difference who you are...

(another melody)
All we need is a miracle....

(and straight from DU...)
I BELIEEEEEEVE...!!

fofl!

47 posted on 03/19/2006 10:37:21 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MRMEAN

Can a case be made that this would have happened quicker if it weren't for the internet and other technology?


48 posted on 03/19/2006 10:44:53 AM PST by Crawdad (So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

If they would start reporting accurate and honest stories and stop playing political games .. I'd start subscribing to the newspaper again

Till then .. I'm just wasting my money .. I could read the same stuff posted at the Daily Kos for free


49 posted on 03/19/2006 12:03:07 PM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Here's Joe Strupp's (Editor & Publisher) spin on this story -

'Wash Post' Ombud Looks at Industry's Budget Woes

By Joe Strupp

Published: March 19, 2006 7:40 PM ET

NEW YORK Ombudsman Deborah Howell of The Washington Post takes on the newspaper industry’s latest woes in her Sunday column, noting the concerns raised this week about the print medium’s future following stories ranging from the sale of Knight Ridder to her own paper’s plan to cut nearly 10% of its newsroom staff.

But, in the end, she contends the Post will “be fine” if “Post journalists write every story, take every photo, compose every headline and design every page with readers in mind, and the newspaper is printed well and delivered on time.”

Still, before reaching that hopeful conclusion, Howell’s column declares that “recent events in the newspaper business make it clear that newsrooms cannot escape market forces....

“Advertising revenue has fallen at most newspapers because of mergers of major retailers, lagging auto sales, the bankruptcies of major advertisers and a shift of classified ads to free Web sites such as Craigslist,” she continues. “Declining circulation and the defection of young readers to the Internet mean that newspapers can't raise their advertising rates year after year.”

Howell, a former reporter at one of the nation’s best-known family newspaper groups, Newhouse, goes on to declare a changing view of the daily miracle. “Newspapers are part of the civic glue that holds communities together. The turnover in newspaper ownership has been staggering to cities that wake up to find their newspaper sold and to employees who thought their jobs were safe,” she writes. “The Post, like most big-city dailies, has lost circulation -- a nearly 7 percent drop since 2003 -- and advertising revenue has been flat while expenses have risen, so The Post is trimming its budget sails. Newspaper journalism is labor-intensive and expensive; the two big costs are people and paper.”

She does declare “bright spots,” noting that Knight Ridder buyer McClatchy “has increased circulation 20 of the past 21 years, achieved a 20 percent-plus profit margin and produces good journalism. The company did it by being focused and disciplined; it did not bulk up in good times but also did not cut staff or news space in bad times.

“And daily newspapers always have more reporting boots on the ground than other media rivals,” she adds. “Reporting is the essence of journalism, and The Post abounds with talented reporters. It is also, like most newspapers, heavily into the Internet, keeping readers informed more quickly and intensely than ever before. Other new ventures include a commuter tabloid, the Express, and the planned WTWP radio station. All the newspaper gurus I've talked to think newspapers and newsrooms have to change, and journalists at The Post talk about it every day.”

She also offers telling insights from three well-known newspaper industry observers: MediaNews Group CEO and vice-chair Dean Singleton; Tom Rosenstiel of the Project for Excellence in Journalism; and John Lavine, dean of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. Each shared concerns, but also hopes that the business will prevail.

"It's not that we're a declining business, we're in a changing business. It's finally becoming real in newsrooms,” she quotes Singleton as saying. “We have a generation of newspaper people who want to write and impress our peers and sources rather than impress our readers and get them to read us, whether in print or online. The economy of the newspaper today will not allow us to do that any longer. To operate more efficiently, we will need fewer editors and fewer process people and hopefully more people on the street gathering news."

“There's one big intangible in all this: a paper's connection with its readers,” she concludes. “Readers who feel respected and who love their newspaper don't depart easily.”



Joe Strupp (jstrupp@editorandpublisher.com) is a senior editor.


50 posted on 03/19/2006 5:10:02 PM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson