Posted on 03/18/2006 10:24:23 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Here is the lefts attempt to discount the docs:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/3/18/153949/649
I read that also in Paul Sperry's "Infiltration".
Thanks for the link- I'll look as soon as the house settles down.
marking
And I ask it quietly, exasperatedly, with no anger or rancor.
"No weapons of mass destructions" has become the mantra of almost everybody. Just the other day I heard a female reporterette talking about some news item and she said, with no forethought, "of course we now know there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq".
I wanted to scream that WE KNOW NO SUCH THING!
Here's my question: Why, dear Lord WHY, did President Bush let all this happen? Why weren't these documents released sooner? Why did he make his work more difficult by allowing the traitors gain such a traction on this?
Well I've got a thousand more questions but I'm betting plenty of you understand my complete exasperation. Rush Limbaugh, the blogosphere, FreeRepublic, have all been carrying water for the administration, for the Iraq war, and we're all tired. What we're discovering now, we all knew it. We knew that Saddam was the baddest player on the planet and we knew he wanted America out of the way.
Why, dear Lord WHY, was that 9-11 commission allowed to pretty up the truth? Why, at first notion that Iraq was involved in all this terrorism, did the concept that secular Saddam would never associate with Islamofacists allowed to be repeated endlessly?
That "no weapons of mass destruction" phrase has become knee-jerk part of the national lexicon. Why wasn't the President defending himself? Because they've managed to drive the poll ratings down to the lamestream's great glee and us peons who fought desperately to get out the truth are just plain weary. And now all this proof dumped onto the blogosphere and this story ain't going away. Meanwhile the 9-11 commission's report is part of history and my granddaughter will learn this skewed version of history.
I'm bitter. Just bitter as hell. All this stuff should have been released while that 9-11 commission was prettying up history for Hillary's presidency.
Forgive me. I am just so tired.
Yes it's a real problem with those hired Arab translators;
Faked translation:Saddam loves the NHL.
Real translation:Saddam burried the WMD's.
Faked translation:Saddam burried a 3 pointer.
You are Joseph Shahda?
It would take a lot of work to digitize 48 thousand cases of documents.
As Rush says sometimes, you're falling into a Radical Left trap: bottom line, this Kossak is not offering an idea or a message to be debated or refuted -- the message is simply "I hate George Bush".
Please add me to the ping list.
That's gotta be tough. My handwriting is a mess, and it almost needs someone to translate it from "scribble" to English, LOL. Thank you for caring enough to do these translations. All who love the truth appreciate what you are doing. THANK YOU!!
Hmm, this IS interesting.
First, it makes me wonder if Bin Laden is actually dead, therefore there is no downside to exposing some documents that may connect him to Iraq. (Not sure what the downside would have been, except for possibly exposing a source.)
Second, I wonder if this is a Karl Rove rope-a-dope coming off the ropes. The docs will be translated just in time to contradict the far left as they swing at pro-Iraq war republicans. If so, pretty good strategery.
WMD and al Queda in Iraq...Hmmmm. Notice how the MSM has turned into turtles. Horrors, democrat horrors and nightmares, could Bush have been right all along? The Main Liners have absolutely hit a dead spot on the subject and are walking around like zombies.
Indeed the Boston Globe journalist is the one who initiated the contact with me via a "Freep Mail" and then later on he asked me for an interview as part of the article he was working regarding the pre-Iraq war documents that are being published on the web by the Pentagon. Yesterday I did a phone interview with him over the phone and he included me in his article today.
Thank you very much my fellow freeper.
Given that optical scanning of the documents has been done, to get them onto the www, it's not so difficult to screen them by keywords.
Of course, this is the Administration that was caught flat-footed by the reaction to the UAE port terminal deal.
We tend to think that everything that becomes news was known by the Bush team in advance, but that's just not physically possible.
The best than can happen is that good people are put in place within the lower levels of the Administration and that they do a good job.
It's impossible to micromanage the Executive Branch. The last idiot who tried was named Carter.
Remember that long vanity thread of yours? To think they questioned your patriotism.
Regards.
I remember but I also forgive my fellow freeper.
Oh wow. I saw the name in the Globe article and I had read your Frrep post with the translation. I was hoping that that Freep poster and the Globe guy were the same.
Thanks so much. I am much impressed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.