Skip to comments.
Judith Miller's New Excuse: the "slanderous" bloggers destroyed her.
Slate ^
| March 16, 2006
| Jack Shafer
Posted on 03/18/2006 6:21:22 AM PST by summer
Judith Miller has a new alibi -- the blogs done her in!
Writer Marie Brenner presents Miller's latest defense in an April Vanity Fair feature story about the fallout from the Valerie Plame investigation. ...
The ones tossing the fire were those dastardlybut unnamedbloggers ...
In June, back in New York, "Miller realized that she was losing her authority" inside the Times. "None of my colleagues ever spoke to me about my reporting. But they would say, 'We don't want to work with her.'
In August, Bill Keller replaced Raines as executive editor, and according to Miller, he told her, "You are radioactive.
You can see it in the blogs."
"I'm pretty sure I never said any such thing," Keller tells Brenner. (This isn't the only recent "he said, she said" story in which Miller comes out the loser. See this sidebar.)
Miller describes to Vanity Fair the process by which the Pajama People destroyed her:
The bloggers were without editing, without a way for people to understand what was good, what was well reportedto distinguish between the straight and the slanderous. Things would get instantly picked up, magnified, and volumized.
(Sounds more like what my hairdresser does with my thinning locks. But never mind.)
In Miller's mind, the bloggers not only poisoned her relationship with the Times brass but also with her colleagues, who, she says, "believed what they read on the blogs."
...Exactly who were all these unnamed bloggers ripping Miller to pieces? ...
If nasty bloggers played such a crucial role in her downfall, why is Miller only now bringing them up? ...
A lame excuse? A case of recovered memory? Or something worse?
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; bloggers; cialeak; judithmiller; judymiller; nra; pajamahadeen; pojamapeople; secondamendment; weblogs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-109 next last
To: summer
Isn't it always someone else with this group of fetid friends?
(Pinch pulled a punch and Miller went down.)
61
posted on
03/18/2006 8:02:51 AM PST
by
OESY
To: tioga
Read further back up the thread and you'll see they have them.
62
posted on
03/18/2006 8:10:10 AM PST
by
Beagle8U
(An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
To: summer
To: msnimje
Blogs are self-editiing. If someone blogs a lie or a story incorrectly, an army of "editors" expose it ... Not necessarily.
64
posted on
03/18/2006 8:26:56 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: tet68
Miller describes to Vanity Fair the process by which the Pajama People destroyed her:
REPLY:
WHO............LIL OLE ME...........LOL
65
posted on
03/18/2006 8:30:14 AM PST
by
OKIEDOC
(There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
To: Cboldt
FR is no blog, and has no editors as such, but talk sh!t here... and 100 people who know better will set you straight in a heart beat!!!
after that, it's Kitties and Lightning...
66
posted on
03/18/2006 8:31:35 AM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I believe she's talking about the lefty blogs... not so much us. It's THEY who were pissed-off about her contacts at the CIA and other security departments.
67
posted on
03/18/2006 8:34:23 AM PST
by
johnny7
(“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
To: summer
"Honest... I ran out of gas. I, I had a flat tire. I didn't have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn't come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake. A terrible flood. Locusts. It was the evil bloggers! IT WASN'T MY FAULT, I SWEAR TO GOD!!!"
To: Chode
FR is no blog, and has no editors as such, but talk sh!t here... and 100 people who know better will set you straight in a heart beat! Not necessarily. I've seen some fairly persistent errors here.
Point being that independent "look farther" is a healthy practice. Don't believe everythng you read, from anywhere.
69
posted on
03/18/2006 8:44:27 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Mrs Zip
70
posted on
03/18/2006 8:46:21 AM PST
by
zip
((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA))))
To: summer
Convenient Memory Syndrome.
Symptoms: You only remember what you want to remember and if you don't like what you remember you make something else up that you like better.
This explains the problem with her "news" reporting.
71
posted on
03/18/2006 8:50:58 AM PST
by
Jimbaugh
(Fear the Base !!!)
To: johnny7
"I believe she's talking about the lefty blogs... not so much us. It's THEY who were pissed-off about her contacts at the CIA and other security departments."
In order for the "Bush Lied" myth to live on, the history of Iraq in the 90's and the CIA estimates about WMD must be destroyed. She's part of that history.
72
posted on
03/18/2006 8:51:11 AM PST
by
Wristpin
("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
To: gaspar
What Miller and Mapes have in common (IMHO) is a desire to blame others for their own errors in judgment.
Miller chose to go to jail in an apparent attempt to become a martyr, and she alone is responsible for that poor choice.
73
posted on
03/18/2006 9:17:45 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: RoseofTexas
Re your post #63 - LOL...
74
posted on
03/18/2006 9:31:35 AM PST
by
summer
To: summer
Shades of the Soviet Union: The Judith Miller Story Have you heard that Miss Miller's recanting?
Her excuses are less than enchanting.
"I've done readers wrong."
"Now I'm moving along."
"I hope you'll forgive my news-slanting."
Miller 'sorry' for WMD inaccuracies [Judith Miller, the US journalist has apologised to her readers], 11/30/2005, story from the BBC, thread on FR
Judith Miller, the US journalist at the heart of the CIA leak probe, has apologised to her readers because her stories about WMD and Iraq turned out to be wrong.
75
posted on
03/18/2006 9:32:51 AM PST
by
syriacus
(Would fewer Americans have died in Iraq if the French and Germans had helped depose Saddam?)
To: OESY
Re your post #61 - LOL...
76
posted on
03/18/2006 9:40:05 AM PST
by
summer
To: trebb
re your post #53 -- Scroll down
HERE to the next to the last letter, to see Judith Miller's letter to Maureen Dowd -- asking Maureen to correct seven factual errors in Dowd's column!
77
posted on
03/18/2006 9:45:39 AM PST
by
summer
To: summer
In October 2005, Miller claimed in an e-mail to the Times public editor that after a July 2003 breakfast meeting with Scooter Libby, she had suggested to Jill Abramsonthen Washington bureau chief and now Times managing editorthat the bureau pursue the tip she'd received about Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV's trip to Niger and his wife's employment at the CIA. Abramson rejected Miller's tale about the tip, telling me, "That is not so."
Is it possible that this is the fib that Fitzgerald is basing his indictment of Libby on? He did call Miller and Libby each back just before the indictment was issued. Surely he asked Jill Abramson about it, but maybe not.
78
posted on
03/18/2006 10:24:31 AM PST
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
To: tet68
Miller describes to Vanity Fair the process by which the Pajama People destroyed her.
If I didn't know there was such an organization as Pajama Media that would be a very funny line.
79
posted on
03/18/2006 10:26:47 AM PST
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: Cboldt
Not necessarily.
Actually yes. When blogs post bogus claims, other bloggers start to fact check and then posts pointing out the errors spread like wild fire through the blogosphere.
See blogs such as Michelle Malkin, Expose the Left, Power Line, Instapundit to name a very few.
80
posted on
03/18/2006 10:37:37 AM PST
by
msnimje
(SAMMY for SANDY --- THAT IS WHAT I CALL A GOOD TRADE!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson