Posted on 03/17/2006 6:57:33 AM PST by little jeremiah
"leftists were able to introduce communist multiculturalism and political correctness into America’s culture, politics, academia, entertainment, and information dissemination venues."
This is so telling, and as true as anything I have read on the subject. No person can read the communist manifesto and not see the gains communism has made in this country, as well as the projection they use to make it appear otherwise. American needs to take back it's country, before it's too late.
AKA "the big plan",that I often refer to........and that people are coming to understand nowdays!!
October 17, 1997--Buenos Aires
There - fixed the typo.
Yep, and keep an eye on the UN and EU.
Yes, that is the next step after hedonistic anarchy - totalitarianism.
Absolutely.
*
IMO, the article is quite right in pointing out that things like drug use, free love, homosexuality, etc. have been maliciously promoted by the Left. 'Course this was not done by them through any love of hedonism or individual freedoms, but in an effort to damage the basic building block of our civilization, the American family.
Those things are in no way truly leftist values, though, they are only being used by the Left as tools. The main suckers are those who call themselves liberals. They would not likely be tolerated very long in a completely socialist society, which would be totalitarian by nature.
However, I'd like to respectfully point out that such basic things as the freedom of choice and the right to privacy from government intrusion, which were disparaged by the author, are intrinsic not only to libertarian philosophy, but to the American ideal of freedom.
The words "choice" and "privacy" are used by liberals/leftists as code words that really mean something else to them.
"Choice" means "killing unborn babies" and "privacy" means "promotion of sodomy" or even "sodomy on the street/in the park/at the beach/in the public toilet".
Real choice and privacy - within legal and philosophical limits as delineated in the Constitution - is vital. But leftists don't mean real choice or real privacy. They're just codewords to them.
It's a diversion, divide and conquer. The internet really has the powers that be spooked, because you don't have to be a billionaire to get a big following or launch a big movement. It hasn't happened yet but it's bound to when things get bad enough.
You are correct, the culprits in misusing the terms are the leftists; I must be in a dense mood tonight, of course "pro choice" means pro abortion - not much choice for the baby (whose body, through fantastic mental contortion, is considered to be a part of a woman's body) is there?
I actually have strong libertarian feelings and ideals, but also am a respecter of traditions since most exist for good reason (such as preservation of family), so I tend to have mixed feelings on some of these issues.
I'm not too sure that the Constitution delineates privacy or choice, except through its negative nature, which does not give central authority over such things to government.
If the fedgov did not overstep its actual authority, we wouldn't have much of the problems we have today.
Thanks for the reply. I agree.
Unfortunately, I think it's a lost cause, barring some kind of unforseen intervention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.