Skip to comments.
Senators near compromise on immigration reform (HERE IT COMES)
REUTERS ^
| 16 March 2006
| Donna Smith
Posted on 03/16/2006 1:51:16 PM PST by VU4G10
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 441-448 next last
To: Peach
It is the fact that the Reagan Amnesty turned out so miserably (magnifying the problem exponentially) that causes us to be so opposed to trying it again.
101
posted on
03/16/2006 2:29:06 PM PST
by
Flavius Josephus
(War today is always cheaper than war tomorrow.)
To: Tulsa Ramjet
All illegals must register under some federal identity program.If you mean, after going back to their home countries first, then we might agree. They should not be in any way legalized without going back first.
102
posted on
03/16/2006 2:29:31 PM PST
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: Serenissima Venezia
The big stick is being lubed up for you know what.
And for all the bots who now love McLame, I can't wait for this one to play out. Meirs and the Port deal will look like a party after this is done.
Let the fat cats go door for the GOP. Let them get the voters to the polls, let them poll watch. I am done.
103
posted on
03/16/2006 2:29:40 PM PST
by
chris1
To: yellowdoghunter
No, no. I thought you said there must be more to the story with Reagan's amnesty. You know -- as though everything he did was gold and everything Bush does is just plain evil.
104
posted on
03/16/2006 2:29:43 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Flavius Josephus
Gee, I thought a freeper upthread posted a blurb about how Reagan's amnesty program was a GOOD thing.
105
posted on
03/16/2006 2:30:18 PM PST
by
Peach
To: BenLurkin
My prediction: We will be sold down the river.One minor correction. We WERE SOLD DOWN THE RIVER YEARS AGO!!
106
posted on
03/16/2006 2:30:37 PM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(Democrats: The communist, socialist, and Al Qaeda loving party of America.)
To: plain talk
You can't deal with the latter before the former. Otherwise... well, you know the drill.
107
posted on
03/16/2006 2:31:06 PM PST
by
Flavius Josephus
(War today is always cheaper than war tomorrow.)
To: inquest
"If you mean, after going back to their home countries first, then we might agree."
Okay.
108
posted on
03/16/2006 2:31:51 PM PST
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?")
To: Serenissima Venezia
Here going shopping is not about someone speaking English. It is about being safe. In the last month the small grocery store I shop at was robbed while open, at gunpoint, by......a hispanic male. The place where I buy gas for my car...same thing. My sister-in-laws house sits behind some low-income apartments full of bangers. They have caught the little ba*stards numerous times coming over their fence to break into their house. These are 16-17 yr old males.
The people committing these crimes are probably not illegal but they are the product of the massive illegal migration to Calif. Afterall, this has been going on for many years here.
Just saying, we live with it daily here and the SOB politicans just don't give a rat's butt.
109
posted on
03/16/2006 2:33:43 PM PST
by
sheana
To: VU4G10
Kennedy told the committee the proposal was not an amnesty. People seeking legal status would have to pay a $2,000 fine, apply for a six-year temporary status, have a job, pay taxes, learn English and show an understanding of U.S. government. who is going to step up to the plate and pay 2000 dollars? Yeah if I was an illegal my understanding is that the governemnt will let me get away with everything thanks teddy you jack@$$
110
posted on
03/16/2006 2:33:56 PM PST
by
ziggy_dlo
(freedom security:give up a little of either, you deserve neither liberalcracks)
To: VU4G10
The rino's are finally coming home to roost. These people don't have a clue about how the public thinks about this issue.
111
posted on
03/16/2006 2:34:22 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: VU4G10
Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, quipped that the requirements "probably exclude half of my family."
Graham supposedly made a comment to a group recently that we need illegals so the greens fees (at the golf courses) won't go up.
112
posted on
03/16/2006 2:35:34 PM PST
by
TomGuy
To: BenLurkin
Why is there even talk of a compromise - do we not have the house and senate??
To: American Quilter
Kennedy and McCain? I don't have to read any more--I'm against it. Ditto on both!
114
posted on
03/16/2006 2:36:15 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
To: The Worthless Miracle
"Why is there even talk of a compromise - do we not have the house and senate??"
If by "we" you mean conservatives then no, we have neither the House nor the Senate.
To: VU4G10
Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, quipped that the requirements "probably exclude half of my family."
I'd like to bust Ole Lindsey one, right across the chops!
116
posted on
03/16/2006 2:38:07 PM PST
by
SwinneySwitch
(Terroristas-beyond your expectations!)
To: All
As much as I hate amnesty or any other name for it, can anyone give the best solution for ridding 15 million illegals already here?
117
posted on
03/16/2006 2:39:24 PM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: Peach
You link to an article by CNN! LMBO
Over the years the figure reported most often is 2-3 million illegals. I took 2.5 million. But that is not the point. Bad policy back then, is still bad policy today. Besides, the debate is not what Reagan did, its what Bush wants to do. Bush`s guest worker proposal from early 2004, is nothing then a backdoor amnesty fo illegals. The McCain-Kennedy bill is a road to citizenship. The Cornyn-Kyl bill isn't much better.
Cong Tancredo's Rewarding Employers that Abide by the Law and Guaranteeing Uniform Enforcement to Stop Terrorism Act of 2005 or the REAL GUEST Act of 2005 starts to get the job done the right way.
Lets do immigration reform the right way this time.
118
posted on
03/16/2006 2:39:51 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
To: VU4G10
This is not only a kick in the teeth to all American citizens it's also kicking the legal immigrants too. They have to pay periodically to keep their status here legal. Once again the 'Illegals' get the better of the deal.
First we need to close the d**m borders with whatever it takes. Arm the NG and put them down there shoulder to shoulder to stop anyone coming in while a nationwide sweep is made and make everyone prove they're here legally. Deport all illegals immediately, no excuses excepted. Once that's completed and only then the border can be opened on a limited basis.
This is war against America and it's time the Washington idiots realized that.
119
posted on
03/16/2006 2:40:31 PM PST
by
AmeriBrit
(AMERICA's WORST ENEMIES! http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/0519RNCNo-1.wmv)
To: Wasanother
We could start by sending those that are in our prisons home and then anyone that is arrested that is an illegal alien should also be sent home. That is at least a start.
120
posted on
03/16/2006 2:40:56 PM PST
by
yellowdoghunter
(I sometimes only vote for Republicans because they are not Democrats....by Dr. Thomas Sowell)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 441-448 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson