Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black Families, Black Men
The Reality Check ^ | March 15, 2006 | Carey Roberts

Posted on 03/16/2006 11:12:22 AM PST by FreeManDC

Sounding like a born-again social conservative, president Lyndon B. Johnson stepped to the podium and made this stirring pronouncement: “When the family collapses, it is the children that are usually damaged. When it happens on a massive scale, the community itself is crippled.”

And with his usual modesty, LBJ later hailed that 1965 Howard University commencement address as his “greatest civil rights speech.”

A few months later the Moynihan Report came out. Despite its commonsense focus on strengthening the Black family, civil rights leaders raised a stink that Mr. Moynihan was trying to “blame the victim.” Floyd McKissick, director of the Congress of Racial Equality, insisted, “It’s the damn system that needs changing.”

So the architects of the Great Society not only set out to ignore the formative role of the Black family – they plotted to make things worse.

They instituted programs with men-stay-away names like “Women, Infants, and Children.” They enacted Medicaid in 1965 that imposed eligibility tests slighting non-custodial parents (read “fathers”).

Then the social do-gooders delivered the knock-out blow: the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program. AFDC had its infamous “man-out-of-the-house” rule that withheld benefits if the primary breadwinner (again, read “father”) resided in the house.

Sociologist Andrew Billingsley has traced the historical lifeline of the Black family. In 1890 the number of intact Black families with fathers and mothers at home was 80%. Over the next seven decades through 1960, that figure held remarkably constant.

But once the Great Society programs were put in place, the African-American family went into a tailspin.

When the number-crunchers tallied up the results from the 1970 decennial census, they couldn’t believe their eyes – the number of intact Black families had fallen to 64%.

For the next 20 years two-parent families continued their free-fall, reaching a rock-bottom 38% in 1990. And most of the remaining intact families were concentrated in the Black middle class. In the inner city, the traditional Black family had essentially ceased to exist.

So forced to compete with a government welfare program, poor Black men had suddenly found themselves persona non grata in their own homes. Like an unwelcome houseguest, Uncle Sam had moved in, unpacked his bags, and made himself a surrogate husband.

What two World Wars and the Great Depression were unable to do, the Great Society accomplished in only 25 years.

With the Black family now in shambles, no amount of federal money could fix the problem. In 1965, 21% of all American children under the age of 18 lived in poverty. Thirty years and billions of welfare dollars later, the number of American children living in poverty was – 21%.

Of course the Leftists refuse to admit the obvious failures of the Great Society. And is their habit, they tell the exact opposite of the truth.

Robert Hill of the Urban League once spun this whopper: “Research studies have revealed that many one-parent families are more intact or cohesive than many two-parent families.” Excuse me Mr. Hill, when millions of poor teenage girls are having out-of-wedlock births, how does that fit into your concept of “intact” and “cohesive”?

Likewise, feminist scholars celebrated the ascendancy of the female-headed household. Believing the nuclear family is the bastion of male privilege, feminist Toni Morrison lionized the “strong black woman” who was “superior in terms of [her] ability to function healthily in the world.”

But there’s a deeper reason for the Leftist cover-up.

Karl Marx argued that economic realities determine social conditions. According to that formulation, if you pump money into a community, social indicators will automatically improve. But the Great Society proved the opposite – squander money on programs that weaken social structures, and life becomes unbearably squalid.

Viewing the plight of the once-proud Black family, Kay Hymowitz recently mused in the City Journal, “The literature was so evasive, so implausible, so far removed from what was really unfolding in the ghetto, that if you didn’t know better, you might conclude that people actually wanted to keep the black family separate and unequal.” [www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_black_family.html]

When I reflect on the vestiges of the American Black family, the disenfranchisement of its men, and the despair of its children, I admit to feeling an abiding sense of betrayal – actually outrage is a better word.

They promised us the Great Society.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: black; blackchildren; blackfamily; blackmen; blackmisery; childsupport; destroytheblackman; failure; fatherlesschildren; goawayblackman; greatfailure; greatsociety; kerryvoters; misery; nofathers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: FreeManDC

The so-call "Great Society" in 1966 was designed to destroy the Black Man, before 1966 the black family was more together and united. I know their were poor, but their was FAMILY and it was more safer.
In order to collect AFDC (welfare)first remove the fathers, and the more babies you had the more $$$ you got, but no fathers in picture, or you lose all that free money,housing,food stamp,etc...medical,etc..
Step#2...In 1976 Child Support started to collect some of that welfare money, they went after those that were kicked out of family(The Fathers).
Step#3...In 1985 came the killer of all killer the Bradley Amendment 42USC,sec. 666(The Beast)

Today we have 70%+ of black childrens with NO FATHERS.
I ask you, where are they now ?
1)DEAD
2)JAIL
3)DRUGGED,Broken,enSLAVE by C/S
4) ALL OF THE ABOVE


21 posted on 03/16/2006 12:19:21 PM PST by Orlando (Do away with 42/666 ( The Bradley Amendment is a father killer))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

OH forgot, ALL THESE LAWS WERE DESIGNED AND PASSED BY THE DEMOCRATS PARTY and their radical-racist-anti-male, anti-GOD FEMINISTS.
N.O.W. also started in 1966 (Girlfriend)
Church of Satan also started in 1966 (Girlfriend)

There were black leaders that were strong supporters of GOD AND FAMILY. They were BOTH murdered to clear the way for this.
Martin Luther King Jr and Mr. M-X


22 posted on 03/16/2006 12:26:12 PM PST by Orlando (Do away with 42/666 ( The Bradley Amendment is a father killer))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

No,if you want to know what has transpired,put down all the books and spend some time in the hood.Its not the liberals fault.Its not the conservatives fault.Its not Bushes fault.Its the entire CULTURE which glorifies"playas",both male and female and allows this nonsense to continue unabated.
Frankly,if I was a young black man I would be scared to death to commit or one day marry any of these"sisters"out there who will tell you straight up-"I want a n---- with cash".I'd probably be chasing the"snow bunnies"and senoritas like many of the"brothers" are doing today.
And I sympathize with the young black women also.Many of the brothers just can't seem to get it together,in school or on the job.They are fronting like starfish trying to be this fly girl super fine type when all she really needs is to just be the hell for real!
And I must add-these young white kids today aren't much better.They curse like sailors,whore around and act like the world owes them King of the Mountain status.Frankly,I enjoy the company of the kids from the hood more than I do some priviledged kid from Menlo Park.
Rant over.Sorry but sometimes the Devil just gets a hold of me and I got to tell it like it is!


23 posted on 03/16/2006 12:28:26 PM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610
I hate how blacks always blame racism for a lack of success. It isn't the fault of racism that so many have kids young and outside of marriage. It isn't the fault of racism that so many drop out of school. It isn't the fault of racism that blacks have a higher AIDS rate in the US. It isn't the fault of racism that blacks are more likely to commit serious crimes. The Poverty Pimps who masquerade as advocates for blacks need to start preaching a message of self reliance instead of reliance on the government. America is a country with tremendous opportunity for those who are willing to work hard in school and in life and for those who are willing to make good choices. Preach that instead of victimology.
24 posted on 03/16/2006 2:00:10 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Very sad situation. Its reflected in the fact that 1. African Americans are the ONLY racial/ethnic group where female labor participation is higher than that of men 2. A disproportionate number of black Americans with middle and above incomes are single females. and 3. Black women finish college at a rate considerably higher than black males.

Of course, there are the consequences of poverty and crime that have been discussed ad nauseum. Nevertheless, to wallow in self pity while other ethnic groups who are new to this country pull ahead is not a good way to go through life.

25 posted on 03/16/2006 2:06:41 PM PST by Clemenza (Seattle: The Pesto of Cities --- George Costanza)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson