1 posted on
03/15/2006 1:03:37 PM PST by
SuzyQ2
To: SuzyQ2
Doubt we'll be hearing this in the evening news.
2 posted on
03/15/2006 1:04:04 PM PST by
mlc9852
To: SuzyQ2
Don't tell this to George Clooney.
4 posted on
03/15/2006 1:05:18 PM PST by
GianniV
To: SuzyQ2
It's good to get as much documentation of the facts as possible, but that won't change a single liberal's mind. Facts, evidence, and logic are all irrelevant to them.
6 posted on
03/15/2006 1:06:46 PM PST by
American Quilter
(Communism is a religion, and none the less potent for being a secular one. - J.F.C. Fuller)
To: SuzyQ2
Hang on to this thread if you want to see what the underside of the rug looks like.
7 posted on
03/15/2006 1:07:08 PM PST by
Sax
To: SuzyQ2
Buried by the old media in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
9 posted on
03/15/2006 1:08:08 PM PST by
Antoninus
(The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
To: SuzyQ2
Mark to check thread later for roaches, I mean trolls.
To: American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Atigun; bannedfromdu; Beckwith; ...
MI Ping
The linked article is worth reading.
11 posted on
03/15/2006 1:15:18 PM PST by
ASA Vet
(Those who talk don't know, those who know don't talk.)
To: SuzyQ2
When will Katie have a segment on this?
14 posted on
03/15/2006 1:22:51 PM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: SuzyQ2
George Clooney seems to revel in his "traitor" image. He may think that it is irony he is enjoying, that kind of "martyr's glee" self-hating liberals that worship in the temple of the "cult of the victim" proudly wear, but if he ever wakes up, he may begin to understand just what a fool he really is. More than likely though, he will sink deeper into an almost impenetrable and opaque denial of the facts, and become ever more hostile to Conservatives, America, and reality. Norman Mailer is a good example of this kind of blatant block headed refusal to believe what is clearly coming into focus; that Saddam and his genocidal regime not only sponsored terrorism, but was clearly supportive and involved with Al Quaida.
To: SuzyQ2
"Don't hold your breath waiting for their apology."
Good advice. The libs never really need to be right, that helps, but they just need to be hysterical.
17 posted on
03/15/2006 1:36:21 PM PST by
ThirstyMan
(hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
To: SuzyQ2
To: SuzyQ2
Didn't ABC have an exclusive on this story when the first excerpts were revealed?
To: SuzyQ2
Thanks for post. As some of us have tirelessly attempted over the past few years here to bring forth, perhaps in the future more Americans via. various news sources will finally start getting a little bit of the truth. Disclamer. Sure I realize the L/MSM role the roost and will minimize stuff from going to print or word (boob tube). But books shall be written and perhaps be allowed to enter the bookshelfs of some book dealers in time. GWB will as I have said many times, be vindicted in due time.
20 posted on
03/15/2006 2:27:41 PM PST by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: SuzyQ2
No matter what evidence turns up the MSM will refuse to print it. And I am sure that the Party of NO will see that it is discredited.
21 posted on
03/15/2006 2:39:45 PM PST by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
To: SuzyQ2
I'm praying President Bush is playing Rope-A-Dopey-Democrat and will provide plenty of evidence for the war to the RNC for the 2008 elections.
Why else would he seem so uninterested in the translated documents and video?
To: SuzyQ2
It really wouldn't have mattered if we had found huge stockpiles of wmds marked by neon signs proclaiming "WMDS HERE" with huge red arrows pointing to them. Or if we had found a videotape of Hussein, Bin-Laden, and Mohammed Atta hugging each other. It wouldn't have mattered if we found that Hussein had personally mailed anthrax-laden envelopes to all American congressmen. The libs would still not believe any of it because they hate Bush (and all Republicans) so much. No amount of evidence will convince them. Even the overwhelming evidence that was found before the war and is now being confirmed by these tapes.
23 posted on
03/15/2006 3:50:42 PM PST by
driftless
( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: SuzyQ2
...pre-war links between Saddam's regime and terrorists...Two words: Salman Pak
24 posted on
03/15/2006 4:08:53 PM PST by
FReepaholic
(If ignorance ain't bliss, I don't know what is.)
To: SuzyQ2
Notice also how NONE of the Junk Media is even reporting the story?
26 posted on
03/15/2006 8:25:52 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
To: SuzyQ2
"[Osama] bin Laden himself met with a senior Iraqi intelligence officer in Khartoum in late 1994 or early 1995."From the 9/11 Commission Report, no less.
27 posted on
03/15/2006 9:23:56 PM PST by
T. Buzzard Trueblood
(left unchecked, Saddam Hussein...will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton)
To: SuzyQ2
28 posted on
03/16/2006 8:59:45 AM PST by
T. Buzzard Trueblood
(left unchecked, Saddam Hussein...will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson