Skip to comments.
Bush Sets Target for Transition In Iraq
Washington Post ^
| 15 March 2006
| Peter Baker
Posted on 03/14/2006 3:33:11 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
President Bush vowed for the first time yesterday to turn over most of Iraq to newly trained Iraqi troops by the end of this year, setting a specific benchmark as he kicked off a fresh drive to reassure Americans alarmed by the recent burst of sectarian violence.
Bush, who until now has resisted concrete timelines as the Iraq war dragged on longer than he expected, outlined the target in the first of a series of speeches intended to lay out his strategy for victory. While acknowledging grim developments on the ground, Bush declared "real progress" in standing up Iraqi forces capable of defending their nation.
"As more capable Iraqi police and soldiers come on line, they will assume responsibility for more territory with the goal of having the Iraqis control more territory than the coalition by the end of 2006," he said in a speech to the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedarulesin9; georgewbush; iraq; iraqization; oif; presidentbush; timebomb; timetable; transition; vietnamization; withdrawal; withdrawlwithhonor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Light at the end of the tunnel!
To: Aussie Dasher
This is a major slap in the face to Al Qaeda.
We're saying that Iraq is becoming stable enough for us to begin our transition out.
2
posted on
03/14/2006 3:34:56 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Aussie Dasher
um...how did they extrapolate "set targets" out of what President Bush said ?
3
posted on
03/14/2006 3:41:32 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(Do you still have sex or are you already playing golf?)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Aussie Dasher
Dumpacraps and their enablers will be spinning this as the "Vietnamization" of Iraq, and praying for a rerun of Saigon.
5
posted on
03/14/2006 3:44:36 PM PST
by
Denver Ditdat
(Melting solder since 1975)
To: Aussie Dasher
Finally.
Thank you Mr. President, good job.
Troops, AWESOME JOB!
6
posted on
03/14/2006 3:46:58 PM PST
by
trubluolyguy
(The optimist sees the doughnut, the pessimist sees the hole.)
To: All
Too bad the RINO's won't allow the "white flag" ad to be run again on TV
Pass this "white flag" ad around on the internet
http://www.gop.com/Media/120905.wmv
Now is the time for all good men and women
to come to the aid of our country
and show support for our service men and women.
You do not have to be in DC to show support for the Troops.
Visit your local military base today and at least once a week.
Or a military or veteran hospital.
If you can't do that then send an e-mail or package
to our troops for morale support.
Proud Patriots -
Sending care packages,
e-mails, and snail mail
to US Military worldwide.
http://www.proudpatriots.org We need coast to coast support for the troops, now, more than ever.
To: Aussie Dasher
[...Bush, who until now has resisted concrete timelines as the Iraq war dragged on longer than he expected...]
So Bush says before the war started:
--This will be a different type of war than America has ever seen.
--This war will last years and continue past his presidency.
--This war will not have the clearly defined victories over standing armies that usually take place in war.
--Victory will be defined by the citizens gaining their freedom and establishing a stable democracy.
And after three years, the Iraqi dictator is overthrown and put on trial, his armies no longer exist, the citizens have elected their own government and new constitution, and the handful of "insurgents" can do nothing to stop this ongoing process except kill one or two innocent people at a time, guaranteeing that they will only enrage the average Iraqi citizen more and more as time goes on.
And the media can only cry "quagmire!"
What a bunch of turds.
To: Denver Ditdat; All
Actually, they are already spinning it as cutting and running.
9
posted on
03/14/2006 4:29:45 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: Aussie Dasher
>>>>Bush vowed not to retreat in the face of violence .... "I make this promise to .... all the families of the fallen heroes," he said. "We will not let your loved ones' dying be in vain. We will finish what we started in Iraq. We will complete the mission."The mission must be completed and the US elections in November better not play a factor in any troop withdrawl. Besides, long term military basis are required in both Iraq and Afghanistan. A full pullout isn't in America's best interests. The WOT is far from over.
10
posted on
03/14/2006 4:30:45 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
To: Aussie Dasher
Turning over does not necessarily equate with withdrawal.
To: Aussie Dasher
as the Iraq war dragged on longer than he expectedWhere does this come from? This is not true as far as I know. I don't ever recall Bush saying something like the war will be over by the end of 2004.
12
posted on
03/14/2006 4:54:50 PM PST
by
speedy
To: Aussie Dasher
and the RATS take another one in the...
13
posted on
03/14/2006 5:19:38 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: spinestein
Well placed statement spinestein!
You are an odd one, ONLY in your impressive memory and your savvy in conveying it! : )
How quickly most others forget.....
14
posted on
03/14/2006 5:28:15 PM PST
by
EGPWS
To: Aussie Dasher
The light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
President Bush said he was never going to give a timetable. He just did.
Now the terrorists, insurgents and civil warmongers in Iraq will just hang back for a year.
This is major league stupid on Bush's behalf.
I think he's paying too much attention to his poll numbers.
To: Loyal Buckeye
I got that out of this too. That the country is turned over to Iraqis doesn't mean a single American soldier leaves. It just means that Americans don't handle the streets, Iraqis do.
16
posted on
03/14/2006 5:30:11 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: Aussie Dasher; Travis McGee
The President is freeing up troops for the liberation of IRAN from the Ayatollahs and terrorists.
Make no mistake. That situation will be ripe in about a year and a half.
17
posted on
03/14/2006 5:48:47 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Pray for Our Troops!)
To: manwiththehands
Not at all. He did not set any table for withdrawal, all what he said that they hope that by the end of this year Iraqi troops are going to handle more territories than non Iraqi coalition troops. Stop your silly knee jerk reaction.
18
posted on
03/14/2006 5:49:44 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: manwiththehands
Not at all. He did not set any table for withdrawal, all what he said that they hope that by the end of this year Iraqi troops are going to handle more territories than non Iraqi coalition troops. Stop your silly knee jerk reaction.
19
posted on
03/14/2006 5:49:44 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: Southack
What about this civil war the MSM keeps telling us about?
20
posted on
03/14/2006 6:08:02 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson