This -- if it proves out -- should throw the environmentalists into a tizzy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: PatrickHenry
However, the most potent greenhouse gas is water, explains Shaidurov Hard to blame water vapor on Republicans, though I'm sure they'll try.
37 posted on
03/13/2006 9:44:35 AM PST by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: PatrickHenry
Shaidurov, however, suggests that the rise, which began between 1906 and 1909, could have had a very different cause, which he believes was the massive Tunguska Event, which rocked a remote part of Siberia, northwest of Lake Baikal on the 30th June 1908. From what I understand the body that triggered the event entered the atmosphere at a very shallow angle, had it not blown up I have always wondered where it would have impacted (if at all).
41 posted on
03/13/2006 10:43:31 AM PST by
Mike Darancette
(In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
To: PatrickHenry
That would make high altitude atomic explosions into climate changers. I think we've done a few of those.
43 posted on
03/13/2006 11:00:21 AM PST by
js1138
To: PatrickHenry
"This -- if it proves out -- should throw the environmentalists into a tizzy.""fraid not. They have been expert at avoiding the ample evidence to the contrary of their pet hypothesis for years and will continue to ignore this and any other evidence which won't force us to shiver in our huts with Prius' parked outside.
50 posted on
03/13/2006 1:43:24 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: PatrickHenry
...And plug all volcanoes!
52 posted on
03/13/2006 2:20:46 PM PST by
onedoug
To: PatrickHenry
However, the most potent greenhouse gas is water, explains Shaidurov and it is this compound on which his study focuses. According to Shaidurov, only small changes in the atmospheric levels of water, in the form of vapour and ice crystals can contribute to significant changes to the temperature of the earth's surface, which far outweighs the effects of carbon dioxide and other gases released by human activities. Just a rise of 1% of water vapour could raise the global average temperature of Earth's surface more then 4 degrees Celsius.It would be unwise to be too dogmatic about this. Water has a dual effect--it can raise the temperature by the greenhouse effect and the clouds formed can lower the temperature by increasing the earth's albedo and reflecting more incoming light back into space. He must have considered this in his calculations, but once again the coverage doesn't mention such an obvious detail!
53 posted on
03/13/2006 7:00:54 PM PST by
ahayes
To: PatrickHenry
But I have been assured that Karl Rove Controls The Weather.
54 posted on
03/14/2006 3:36:57 PM PST by
pogo101
To: PatrickHenry
55 posted on
03/14/2006 3:43:19 PM PST by
aculeus
To: abbi_normal_2; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; AMDG&BVMH; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
59 posted on
03/22/2006 12:03:48 AM PST by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: PatrickHenry
"This -- if it proves out -- should throw the environmentalists into a tizzy." Or it could be their greatest empowerment: an excuswe to tax and control water.
61 posted on
03/22/2006 6:24:21 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: cogitator
This is where I got the water vapor idea. Thought you might be interested. I was wrong, it's not water vapor but ice crystals that are the dirty little secret.
PING
74 posted on
04/05/2006 11:18:47 AM PDT by
westmichman
(Please pray with me for global warming. I'M a BUSHBOT!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson