I still conclude that bayourant had to have known he was speaking with Mark Levin,
###
You’re right. Read Jim Rob’s comments on that thread. He told her by FReep mail that she was talking to Mark and to knock off her libelous smears. She ignored Jim Rob and he bounced her.
(see post #631 copied below)
To: CharlesWayneCT
It's no secret that holdonnow is Mark Levin. But just in case the guy from the Bayou country didn't know this, I informed him via FReepmail that it was true. Also advised him to retract and apologize post haste. Instead of heeding my advice to back off, he continued the slander campaign. Thus he now swims with the fishes.
631 posted on 03/13/2006 1:01:09 AM CST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
I didn't know holdnow was Mark Levin. That explains his post in response to my thread berating Hannity. Hannity gave Levin his national exposure. Of course he'll defend Hannity.
###
You’re right. Read Jim Rob’s comments on that thread. He told her by FReep mail that she was talking to Mark and to knock off her libelous smears. She ignored Jim Rob and he bounced her.
I wouldn't have known because if I'm on a busy thread where I'm the one answering other people's posts, I don't go back to the main page, I hit refresh, read the new comments and spend time responding. I wouldn't have seen Jim's FReepmail until it was too late. So I don't know that bayourant was ignoring Jim.
In fact, on one of the many threads I read (I believe last week) there was a discussion wrt whether bayourant was aware of just "who" he/she was talking too (Levin). It was made clear at that time.. What we are supposed to believe is that bayourant doesn't read the entire thread he takes an active role in debating? I don't buy that.
But I can't dig deep enough to source it out.
sw