Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Top Judge Says US Risks Edging Near To Dictatorship
The Guardian (UK) ^ | 3-13-2006 | Julian Borger

Posted on 03/12/2006 6:49:12 PM PST by blam

Former top judge says US risks edging near to dictatorship

· Sandra Day O'Connor warns of rightwing attacks
· Lawyers 'must speak up' to protect judiciary

Julian Borger in Washington
Monday March 13, 2006
The Guardian (UK)

Sandra Day O'Connor, a Republican-appointed judge who retired last month after 24 years on the supreme court, has said the US is in danger of edging towards dictatorship if the party's rightwingers continue to attack the judiciary.

In a strongly worded speech at Georgetown University, reported by National Public Radio and the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Ms O'Connor took aim at Republican leaders whose repeated denunciations of the courts for alleged liberal bias could, she said, be contributing to a climate of violence against judges.

Ms O'Connor, nominated by Ronald Reagan as the first woman supreme court justice, declared: "We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary."

She pointed to autocracies in the developing world and former Communist countries as lessons on where interference with the judiciary might lead. "It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings."

In her address to an audience of corporate lawyers on Thursday, Ms O'Connor singled out a warning to the judiciary issued last year by Tom DeLay, the former Republican leader in the House of Representatives, over a court ruling in a controversial "right to die" case.

After the decision last March that ordered a brain-dead woman in Florida, Terri Schiavo, removed from life support, Mr DeLay said: "The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behaviour."

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dictatorship; edging; former; judge; near; oconnor; risks; sandradayoconnor; scotus; top; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2006 6:49:19 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Sandy spent the last 24 years pissing on the Constitution, negating the power of Congress and the States and now she wants to warn us about unbridled power in the Executive Branch?
2 posted on 03/12/2006 6:51:15 PM PST by msnimje (SAMMY for SANDY --- THAT IS WHAT I CALL A GOOD TRADE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thank God this woman decided to leave the court.


3 posted on 03/12/2006 6:51:25 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

She wasn't "Top Judge". SHe was "Associate Top Judge".


4 posted on 03/12/2006 6:51:48 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Thank you God for the act of grace that made THIS lunatic step down from the US Supreme Court! Seems she has spent WAY too much time on the DC Party circuit.
5 posted on 03/12/2006 6:51:53 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

she's a bigger idiot than I thought.......... glad shes gone before she helped destroy the whole enchalada


6 posted on 03/12/2006 6:52:22 PM PST by right right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
So much for the old bats centrist and moderate label, she was/is a flaming commie.
7 posted on 03/12/2006 6:53:04 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right right

Me,too.


8 posted on 03/12/2006 6:53:10 PM PST by MamaB (mom to an Angel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Of course. Don't you know in THEIR warped little world unbridled power should rest solely in the hands of Unelected Judges. HOW dare anyone think to impinge on their unchecked powers!


9 posted on 03/12/2006 6:53:27 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Having paranoid, delusional, irrational thinkers sitting on The United States Supreme Court is scarier.


10 posted on 03/12/2006 6:53:56 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaB

Hi Mama. I hope you are well! Good to see you


11 posted on 03/12/2006 6:54:08 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

Apparently she failed to see a half-century+ of leftist judicial activist dictatorship.


12 posted on 03/12/2006 6:54:35 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

But...but...she's a "moderate!" An enlightened moderate, centrist, middle-of-the-road wise woman!


13 posted on 03/12/2006 6:55:29 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (None genuine without my signature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Thank God this woman decided to leave the court.
-----
Yes, she was as big a problem for Constitutional America as are the other socialist/activists. Like other liberal activists on the judiciary, "attacking the judiciary", is expecting the judiciary to OBEY THE LAW, uphold and protect the Constitution, and not legislate and conduct personal political agendas from the bench.


14 posted on 03/12/2006 6:55:54 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

Dear Sandra,

STFU. We don't have to listen to you anymore.

Love, Bondjamesbond.


15 posted on 03/12/2006 6:56:14 PM PST by bondjamesbond (RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Thank God this woman decided to leave the court.
-----
Yes, she was as big a problem for Constitutional America as are the other socialist/activists. Like other liberal activists on the judiciary, "attacking the judiciary", is expecting the judiciary to OBEY THE LAW, uphold and protect the Constitution, and not legislate and conduct personal political agendas from the bench.


16 posted on 03/12/2006 6:56:18 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: right right
Looks like she comes from the same cloth as Jimma Carter comes from.
Reagan was a great President, but, this is one mistake and regret he must have thought over and over.
I just the choice to put the first woman on the bench was pressure from the women's groups.
17 posted on 03/12/2006 6:56:38 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Isn't she the lame brained judge that wanted to bring international law into our courts.
18 posted on 03/12/2006 6:56:38 PM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I thought she resigned to take care of her ailing husband.


19 posted on 03/12/2006 6:57:56 PM PST by Carolinamom (I don't believe in a government that protects us from ourselves. ---Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
Oh, it's just Sandy.(yawn)
20 posted on 03/12/2006 6:58:00 PM PST by airborne (Satan's greatest trick was convincing people he doesn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson